USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
    China
    Home / China / View

    Lotte may harm itself by yielding to THAAD

    By Zhang Zhouxiang | China Daily | Updated: 2017-03-04 13:17

    "No THAAD! Lotte out of China!" This is what was written on the banner held by a group of protesters in front of a Lotte-invested supermarket in the city of Qidong, East China's Jiangsu province, on Thursday.

    Such protests were organized after the Republic of Korea conglomerate Lotte Group accepted a plot of land in exchange for its Skyhill Golf Course in Seongju where the US' Terminal High Altitude Area Defense anti-missile system will be deployed, a move which China is strongly opposed to because it will destabilize the strategic balance in East Asia in favor of the United States.

    Does this remind you of a similar protest last year? In July, after an arbitration tribunal passed a biased verdict in support of the Philippines and against China in a South China Sea dispute case, groups of angry people in North China's Hebei province blocked the doors to some KFC outlets shouting slogans such as "Foreign brand out of China!"

    Lotte may harm itself by yielding to THAAD

    Yet the two demonstrations have evoked different reactions. While many media outlets called the demonstrations against KFC "foolish", quite a few people support the protests against Lotte.

    So what is the difference between the two protests?

    KFC has seldom shown interest in international relations; it didn't say anything about the South China Sea maritime disputes and had no relationship with the arbitration tribunal. Therefore, those people protesting against KFC had little knowledge about the real world and were demanding that foreign brands be boycotted at random.

    But Lotte's case is different. Intentionally or otherwise, it has become part of a military arrangement that poses a potential threat to China and its people. The Chinese government, which follows the rule of law and market economy, won't take any discriminatory action against Lotte, but the Chinese people have the right to vote with their feet and put pressure on a company that helps threaten their security.

    Moreover, the tactics adopted by the anti-KFC and anti-Lotte protesters are different. Those protesting against KFC not only blocked the outlets' doors, but also asked the diners to leave their food and walk out of the restaurants, which is a violation of individual rights. However, there are no reports suggesting the anti-Lotte protesters have used such tactics. Instead, many of the protesters have gone online to say they respect other people's choice to continue buying Lotte's goods and services.

    Some people, though, have defended Lotte, saying the company faced immense pressure in the ROK and it would have suffered heavy losses in the country had it rejected the ROK government's swap deal. But such defense is untenable, as THAAD remains a controversial issue even for ROK citizens.

    On Monday, for instance, a large group of people gathered before the Lotte headquarters in Seoul and appealed to the company's executives to not accept the ROK government offer. Many people in the ROK know that THAAD does not guarantee as much security to their country as good relations with neighbors do. So had Lotte rejected the ROK government's swap deal, it might not have suffered huge losses in the domestic market.

    And even if some consumers in the ROK boycotted Lotte goods and services, the Chinese market could have covered the resulting losses. Lotte has more than 120 shopping complexes in China, and their total revenue has increased sevenfold in seven years, reaching 3.2 trillion ROK won ($2.8 billion). In the first quarter of 2016, Chinese consumers spent 942 billion won in Lotte's outlets, which accounted for 70.8 percent of the Lotte's revenue worldwide, more than three times that from the ROK.

    Lotte's final decision shows it does not care enough about the Chinese market, and may harm itself for that.

    The author is a writer with China Daily. zhangzhouxiang@chinadaily.com.cn

    Editor's picks
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    天堂在/线中文在线资源官网| 极品粉嫩嫩模大尺度无码视频| 亚洲永久无码3D动漫一区| 中文字幕亚洲欧美日韩2019 | 一区二区三区无码高清| 亚洲国产成人片在线观看无码| 精品久久久久中文字幕日本| 国产精品无码免费专区午夜| 无码人妻一区二区三区在线| 中文精品99久久国产| 香蕉伊蕉伊中文视频在线| 亚洲国产精品成人AV无码久久综合影院 | 欧美人妻aⅴ中文字幕| 办公室丝袜激情无码播放| 中文字幕在线看日本大片| 日本乱中文字幕系列观看| 黄桃AV无码免费一区二区三区 | 东京热人妻无码一区二区av| 天堂а√中文在线| 99久久中文字幕| а天堂中文最新版在线| 无码中文字幕av免费放dvd| 亚洲精品97久久中文字幕无码 | 日韩av片无码一区二区三区不卡| 十八禁无码免费网站| 亚洲AV永久无码精品一百度影院 | 特级做A爰片毛片免费看无码| 色综合久久中文综合网| 日本一区二区三区精品中文字幕| 中文字幕亚洲欧美日韩在线不卡| 在线综合亚洲中文精品| 中文国产成人精品久久不卡| 久久精品中文闷骚内射| 亚洲AV无码久久精品狠狠爱浪潮 | 惠民福利中文字幕人妻无码乱精品| 久久久久久人妻无码| 国产日韩精品中文字无码| 日韩精品久久无码人妻中文字幕 | AV色欲无码人妻中文字幕| 日本按摩高潮a级中文片| 精品人妻va出轨中文字幕|