USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
    China
    Home / China / Across America

    US experts call for India border withdrawal

    By Chen Weihua in Washington | China Daily USA | Updated: 2017-08-03 10:59

    Road construction given as reason for June incursion into Chinese territory

    US experts have urged Indian troops to withdraw from intruded Chinese territory and also called on the two countries to resolve the issue diplomatically.

    Indian troops illegally crossed into the Sikkim section of the border between the two countries to Doklam, Chinese territory, in June, in an attempt to stop China's road construction going on there. The action drew strong protests from China.

    New Delhi has described China's road construction as a "significant change of the status quo with serious security implications for India", citing its geographic proximity to its vulnerable "Chicken's Neck" - the narrow stretch of territory connecting the majority of India to its more remote northeast areas.

    Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi told reporters in Bangkok on July 24 that it is very clear who is right and who is wrong in the standoff in Doklam, and that even senior Indian officials have publicly said that Chinese troops have not intruded into Indian territory.

    "In other words, India admitted that it has entered Chinese territory. The solution to this issue is simple, which is that they behave themselves and withdraw," Wang said, as quoted in a Chinese Foreign Ministry statement.

    Jon Taylor, a professor of political science at the University of St Thomas in Houston, said the Indian military breached both international law and treaty convention by entering Chinese territory shortly after Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi visited the US.

    "The incursion can be viewed as part of a greater strategic competition between China and India, one that is influenced by Trump's push for a closer partnership with India," he said.

    Taylor said that despite India's actions, China has remained restrained and tolerant. "I believe that this is because China wishes to preserve friendly China-India relations," he said, adding the need for a swift resolution of the issue is clear.

    But he said India does not understand the breadth of China's established presence on the Donglang (Doklam) Pass, nor its resolve to maintain its presence in the Donglang region since it is indisputably a part of China's territory and under its effective jurisdiction.

    "India would do well to remember China's response and resolve during the 1962 border war. Continued provocations could lead to a much wider, and uglier, conflict that would inevitably result in a Chinese victory, again".

    Ryan Hass, a foreign policy fellow at the Brookings Institution, said although the timing and final contours for resolving the dispute remain as yet unknown, there is cause for cautious optimism that the two countries have the wisdom to peacefully resolve the dispute.

    "Chinese and Indian leaders are among the most talented and creative diplomats in the world," he said.

    "Beijing and New Delhi would benefit by focusing their energies now on creating a conducive environment for peaceful solutions to emerge," said Hass, who served as director for the Chinese mainland, Taiwan and Mongolia at the National Security Council in the Obama administration.

    Ted Carpenter, a senior fellow of defense and foreign policy studies at the Cato Institute, said the dispute should be addressed through patient, creative diplomacy by Beijing and New Delhi. "Both governments need to make resolving this troubling issue a very high priority," he said.

    Hass said the US could use the dispute as an opportunity to clarify privately for both China and India its strategic interest in stable and productive relations between the two Asian powers.

    "Beyond that, the United States should avoid involving itself in the dispute, either privately or publicly, as any such involvement likely will not help to calm tensions, but could have the unintended effect of hardening each side's position as well as souring US relations with one or both of the disputants," he wrote in an article on the Brookings website.

    The US has not taken a side so far. State Department spokeswoman Heather Nauert said on July 18 that the US is concerned about the ongoing situation there, saying both sides should work together to try to come up with some better sort of arrangement for peace.

    chenweihua@chinadailyusa.com

    Polar icebreaker Snow Dragon arrives in Antarctic
    Xi's vision on shared future for humanity
    Air Force units explore new airspace
    Premier Li urges information integration to serve the public
    Dialogue links global political parties
    Editor's picks
    Beijing limits signs attached to top of buildings across city
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    亚洲国产成人片在线观看无码| 精品久久久久久中文字幕大豆网| av无码国产在线看免费网站| 国产亚洲美日韩AV中文字幕无码成人 | 亚洲AV无码一区二区乱子伦 | 日韩AV无码精品人妻系列| 色婷婷综合久久久久中文一区二区| 午夜无码A级毛片免费视频| 亚洲成人中文字幕| 免费A级毛片无码无遮挡| 小SAO货水好多真紧H无码视频| 最近中文字幕完整在线看一| 亚洲人成影院在线无码观看| 无码精品视频一区二区三区| 精品久久久久久中文字幕大豆网 | 无码爆乳护士让我爽| 日韩av无码中文字幕| 国产精品无码国模私拍视频| 午夜无码伦费影视在线观看| 国产亚洲大尺度无码无码专线| 国产欧美日韩中文字幕| 无码超乳爆乳中文字幕久久| 亚洲人成无码网站久久99热国产| 97免费人妻无码视频| 日韩人妻无码精品一专区 | 高清无码中文字幕在线观看视频| 中文字幕人妻无码专区| 久久激情亚洲精品无码?V | 91精品无码久久久久久五月天| 亚洲av无码av制服另类专区| 精品亚洲AV无码一区二区三区| 久久精品?ⅴ无码中文字幕| 无码中文字幕av免费放dvd| 中文字幕久精品免费视频| 全球中文成人在线| 无码人妻精品中文字幕免费| 天天爽亚洲中文字幕| 欧美在线中文字幕| 日本免费中文视频| 在线播放中文字幕| 久久亚洲中文字幕精品一区四|