English 中文網 漫畫網 愛新聞iNews 翻譯論壇
    中國網站品牌欄目(頻道)
    當前位置: Language Tips > 每日播報

    Crucial Snowden questions loom large over Pulitzers

    [ 2014-04-14 15:15] 來源:中國日報網     字號 [] [] []  
    免費訂閱30天China Daily雙語新聞手機報:移動用戶編輯短信CD至106580009009

    Download

    Hero or traitor? The United States is still polarized over Edward Snowden and whether the newspapers that exposed the extent of the National Security Agency's vast global spying network should be lauded or condemned.

    Ten months on, the question on journalists' lips is whether the most prestigious journalism prize in the US, the Pulitzers, will honor them when the annual awards are announced on Monday.

    For most journalists, there is no debate.

    In arguably the most influential story for a decade, The Guardian and The Washington Post broke sensational new ground by exposing how the US government monitors the data of millions.

    But the leaks embarrassed Washington, strained relations with allies angered that the US had been tapping into the private phone calls of leaders, and sparked a debate within the US on the merits and morality of mass surveillance.

    Public opinion is at worst divided. Many believe that US citizens have a right to know what the government is doing. Others say Snowden is a traitor and a criminal who should be prosecuted.

    In January, US Director of National Intelligence James Clapper suggested that journalists reporting on the leaks had acted as Snowden's "accomplices."

    Glenn Greenwald and Laura Poitras, US journalists who interviewed Snowden in Hong Kong, returned to the US on Friday for the first time after breaking the story.

    They told reporters after receiving a George Polk Award for their coverage with Ewen MacAskill of The Guardian and the Post's Barton Gellman that they fear arrest and being subpoenaed.

    Media experts say there is no evidence that any of the reporting endangered national security, and Greenwald, Poitras and MacAskill have emphasized how carefully they treated the material.

    Their supporters say it would be damaging for the credibility of the Pultizer Board, which has a reputation for being conservative, not to honor the biggest scoop in a decade.

    "They would have surrendered to the right wing or the culturally conservative on security questions in American politics," said Christopher Simpson, communications professor at American University in Washington.

    The US media is considered more conservative on questions of US national security than foreign publications.

    (中國日報網英語點津 Helen 編輯)

    Crucial Snowden questions loom large over Pulitzers

    About the broadcaster:

    Crucial Snowden questions loom large over Pulitzers

    Anne Ruisi is an editor at China Daily online with more than 30 years of experience as a newspaper editor and reporter. She has worked at newspapers in the U.S., including The Birmingham News in Alabama and City Newspaper of Rochester, N.Y.

     
    中國日報網英語點津版權說明:凡注明來源為“中國日報網英語點津:XXX(署名)”的原創作品,除與中國日報網簽署英語點津內容授權協議的網站外,其他任何網站或單位未經允許不得非法盜鏈、轉載和使用,違者必究。如需使用,請與010-84883631聯系;凡本網注明“來源:XXX(非英語點津)”的作品,均轉載自其它媒體,目的在于傳播更多信息,其他媒體如需轉載,請與稿件來源方聯系,如產生任何問題與本網無關;本網所發布的歌曲、電影片段,版權歸原作者所有,僅供學習與研究,如果侵權,請提供版權證明,以便盡快刪除。
     

    關注和訂閱

    人氣排行

    翻譯服務

    中國日報網翻譯工作室

    我們提供:媒體、文化、財經法律等專業領域的中英互譯服務
    電話:010-84883468
    郵件:translate@chinadaily.com.cn
     
     
    亚洲VA中文字幕无码一二三区| 久久精品中文无码资源站| 国产精品无码久久综合| 最近完整中文字幕2019电影| 变态SM天堂无码专区| 中文字幕丰满伦子无码| 国产成人三级经典中文| 国产无码一区二区在线| 无码囯产精品一区二区免费| 精品久久久久久无码中文字幕| 亚洲精品无码永久在线观看| 久久精品无码专区免费东京热| 无码播放一区二区三区| 日本免费在线中文字幕| 精品无码国产自产拍在线观看蜜| 无码人妻丰满熟妇区免费| 日本乱人伦中文字幕网站| 人妻少妇精品中文字幕AV| 日韩少妇无码喷潮系列一二三| 免费看又黄又无码的网站| 亚洲动漫精品无码av天堂| 国产精品99久久久精品无码| 中文字幕在线免费| а天堂8中文最新版在线官网| 中文字幕精品无码一区二区| 97碰碰碰人妻视频无码| 精品无码一区二区三区亚洲桃色| 无码专区中文字幕无码| 亚洲中文字幕无码一久久区| 自慰无码一区二区三区| 中文字幕无码日韩专区免费| 中文字幕乱码人妻综合二区三区| 久久亚洲中文字幕精品一区| 久久精品99无色码中文字幕 | 无码区国产区在线播放| 中文无码制服丝袜人妻av| 熟妇人妻VA精品中文字幕| 亚洲中文字幕无码一区二区三区| 亚洲午夜无码久久久久小说| 永久无码精品三区在线4| 日韩av无码中文无码电影|