您現在的位置: Language Tips> Columnist> Zhang Xin  
     





     
    Propaganda and... Iraq (2)
    [ 2007-06-29 15:06 ]

    Continuing from our discussion from Tuesday, here's Greenwald (hit this link for story in full, http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2007/06/23/al_qaeda/index.htmlbeginning his story (Everyone we fight in Iraq is now 'al-Qaida') with a quote of an observant reader:

    Josh Marshall (www.talkingpointsmemo.com - Xin) publishes an e-mail from a reader who identifies what is one of the most astonishing instances of mindless, pro-government "reporting" yet:

    It's a curious thing that, over the past 10 - 12 days, the news from Iraq refers to the combatants there as 'al-Qaida' fighters. When did that happen?

    Until a few days ago, the combatants in Iraq were 'insurgents' or they were referred to as 'Sunni' or 'Shia'a' fighters in the Iraq Civil War. Suddenly, without evidence, without proof, without any semblance of fact, the US military command is referring to these combatants as 'al-Qaida'.

    Welcome to the latest in Iraq propaganda.
    ……

    This reader, who identified himself as SM, is the hope of democracy in America. I mean, you can't ask politicians to always be telling the truth, can you?

    Nor can you trust the media. Even those who claim to be "free" and "independent" are only independent to a degree - independent to major news networks, that is. They are not "independent" from presenting (their own equally) subjective views and are certainly not "free" from making errors, typo, editorial or judgmental.

    Nor can you trust anyone (you and me) for that matter - we lie through our teeth whenever we think the circumstance calls for it - though this last point is not up for debate here.

    We just can't trust politicians and the media to a T.

    Disclaimer: The purpose of this column is not to question governments and bureaucrats for not doing their job - I fully trust they are doing their job. Nor do I ask the public not to listen to the mainstream media. No, that is too unrealistic and impractical an advice to suggest because mainstream media are probably the only ones most people are exposed to anyway, such is the rate of concentration of media ownership in America and elsewhere. Instead, the purpose of this column is to encourage readers to take everything they read with a pinch of salt.

    And a big pinch of it in the case of Iraq. You recall, I am sure, that when the Bush Administration first ventured to prepare for war against the Saddam Hussein, they were fighting for discovering and eliminating "WMDs" (weapons of mass destruction). When no trace of WMDs was found months into the invasion, they began to say they were fighting for "freedom" (don't let it be lost on you that hundreds of thousands of Iraqis and thousands of American soldiers are now permanently free from the so-called "freedom"). Then they fought against "insurgents" who are vying for power in a "civil war" (don't let it be lost on you either that America remains the principle party in this so-called "civil war"). Apparently things continue to get out of hand and now the administration comes up with this latest propaganda gimmick: to identify all resistance fighters as "al-Qaida" - the very terrorist group responsible for flying airplanes into the Twin Towers on 9/11.

    As Greenwald points out, who could argue with that? It's the same logic Bush used from Day One: We're fighting terrorism and you're either with us or against us.

    Again, this is not to say that governments or the media they control (or fail to control) are wrong to do what they are doing. They are not wrong. Society is divided into many various interest groups and it will be quite unreasonable to ask governments or the media to represent your interests ahead of the interests of other people all the time, not to say that it is impossible of accomplishment.

    It's especially tough to ask much from the media, whose working classes (journalists) are getting paid to say what the employer wants be said or get lost. Asked to give a toast before the New York Press Club in 1880, John Swinton, formerly Chief of Staff at the New York Times, put it bluntly:

    There is no such thing, at this date of the world's history, as an independent press. You know it and I know it. There is not one of you who dares to write your honest opinions, and if you did, you know beforehand that it would never appear in print. I am paid weekly for keeping my honest opinions out of the paper I am connected with. Others of you are paid similar salaries for similar things, and any of you who would be so foolish as to write honest opinions would be out on the streets looking for another job.

    If I allowed my honest opinions to appear in one issue of my paper, before twenty-four hours my occupation would be gone. The business of the journalist is to destroy the truth; to lie outright; to pervert; to vilify; to fawn at the feet of Mammon, and to sell the country for his daily bread. You know it and I know it and what folly is this toasting an independent press. We are the tools and vassals of the rich men behind the scenes. We are the jumping jacks, they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our possibilities and our lives are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes.

    Well, actually, things are not so grim. There's always been a counterbalance and that is a questioning readership, such as SM and readers like him. Whenever politicians understand that the public know what they are up to, they stop doing something bad. Or at least they stop doing it so wantonly, brazenly and blatantly.

    So then, the lesson from Iraq?

    Order a large quantity of salt, figuratively speaking. Have a large measure of it in reserve any time you open a broadsheet.

     

    About the author:
     

    Zhang Xin is Trainer at chinadaily.com.cn. He has been with China Daily since 1988, when he graduated from Beijing Foreign Studies University. Write him at: zhangxin@chinadaily.com.cn, or raise a question for potential use in a future column.

     
     
    相關文章 Related Stories
     
             
     
     
     
     
     
             

     

     

     
     

    48小時內最熱門

         
      吵架英語三十句
      尼日利亞議長叫停銀行“美女營銷”
      英語和漢語之間的詞匯空缺
      全國開展“無車日”活動
      五個手指怎么說

    本頻道最新推薦

         
      Hocus pocus?
      英語和漢語之間的詞匯空缺
      Greener pasture?
      “江南”怎么譯
      Climate - a problem for all nations

    論壇熱貼

         
       "電視選秀"怎么翻譯?
      how to translate "造星"
      how to translate "特供豬"?
      參加BBC在線競賽 獲免費倫敦游機會!
      how to say "代言"
      “試婚”怎么說






    日韩av无码免费播放| 亚洲一区二区无码偷拍| 人妻少妇久久中文字幕一区二区 | 亚洲AV无码一区二区二三区入口| 中文字幕无码av激情不卡久久| 无码少妇一区二区性色AV | 寂寞少妇做spa按摩无码| 欧美日韩中文字幕久久伊人| 国产精品一级毛片无码视频| 亚洲中文字幕无码一区二区三区| 亚洲AV中文无码乱人伦在线视色| 亚洲无av在线中文字幕| 亚洲va中文字幕无码| 国产综合无码一区二区三区| 无码人妻久久一区二区三区免费丨| 国产中文在线亚洲精品官网| 日韩av无码中文无码电影| 日韩电影无码A不卡| 国产成人精品无码免费看| 亚洲AV无码一区东京热| 亚洲成a人片在线观看无码专区| 中文无码人妻有码人妻中文字幕| 中文精品久久久久国产网址| 日韩成人无码中文字幕| 中文毛片无遮挡高潮免费| a中文字幕1区| 亚洲人成中文字幕在线观看| 中文字字幕在线中文乱码不卡| 免费无码专区毛片高潮喷水| 国产成人无码久久久精品一| 99精品一区二区三区无码吞精| 日韩亚洲AV无码一区二区不卡| 无码精品黑人一区二区三区| 无码AV波多野结衣久久| 无码一区二区三区老色鬼| 人妻中文字幕无码专区| 国产成人无码综合亚洲日韩| 免费 无码 国产在线观看观| 久久精品中文字幕大胸| 精品久久人妻av中文字幕| 久久久久综合中文字幕|