您現在的位置: Language Tips> Columnist> Zhang Xin  
     





     
    Read between the lines
    [ 2007-09-07 14:37 ]

    Scanning Salon.com, I came across a good example for explaining the idiom "read between the lines", which has been a topic I want to address for some time.

    First, definition. To read between the lines is to guess someone's real feelings and meanings from something they actually write.

    Political observers understand this perfectly. If, say, a politician is reported to have resigned because of "personal" reasons, you can often be sure that the said politician has just been removed from power, and perhaps brutally. He's the loser of the latest round of power struggle. In other words, the reasons are anything but "personal". Similarly, if someone has done the same for "health" problems, you can be certain they are NOT ill. He has no physical ailment but may develop one later – "health" problems may catch up with him soon if he can't successfully deal with the depression he suffers from being sacked.

    Likewise, when a government spokesman says that the leadership is one of "unity and harmony", you can infer pretty safely that the leaders can't stand each other.

    In diplomatic writing, we often see meetings between heads of governments described as "frank", "cordial" and so forth. Cordial means that the leaders are exchanging pleasantries only – telling each other what they want to hear. If the discussion is described as "frank", on the other hand, that means the leaders hate each other and are making sure the other person knows it. The Economist magazine, for example, routinely describes "frank discussion" as "a diplomat's word for a fallout," or fierce quarrels short of "trading blows" and "dispatching gunboats", also Economist terminologies. Next, the very "diplomat" may be expelled for involving in "activities deemed incompatible with his status", which is euphemism, usually for spying.

    That's exaggerating it, I know. But, with media increasingly owned and controlled by fewer people and fewer interest groups, isn't it better to err on the side of caution? You'd better stay aware and alert of these things so as not to be taken for a ride. The public needs a healthy cynicism regarding TV, newspapers as well as anything from cyberspace. After all, propaganda does two things, usually simultaneously – it propagates some facts and ideas while it goes out of its way to hide others.

    Anyways, the latest example I have concerns a Financial Times report about China. It is alarmingly titled "Chinese military hacked into Pentagon".

    "Sounds like the 'China threat' is very much alive!", writes Andrew Leonard in his How The World Works column. Leonard read in between the lines of the FT report on Tuesday and saw the other side of the story, as is evidenced by the way he titles his article – "U.S. military routinely hacks into Chinese networks".

    That's exactly what he read in between the lines of the FT report. Leonard says:

     How the World Works doesn't doubt that the dance between the world's preeminent superpower, the U.S., and the No. 1 contender for the throne, China, could someday turn into an ugly showdown. But the Financial Times' choice for a headline, "Chinese military hacked into Pentagon," could be accused of rhetorical alarmism, and not just because most of the information accessed during the attack appears to have been unclassified.

    Later in the same article:

    The PLA regularly probes U.S. military networks – and the Pentagon is widely assumed to scan Chinese networks – but U.S. officials said the penetration in June raised concerns to a new level because of fears that China had shown it could disrupt systems at critical times.

    Scan? Scan? What does that mean?Is it the same as "probe"? Or could one even say, "The Pentagon is widely assumed to regularly hack into Chinese networks"?

    And:

            An editorial in the Financial Times running along with its "scoop" even observes:

    Yet it is probably also right to assume that the U.S. and other western governments are busy infiltrating the computer systems of foreign governments. It is therefore disingenuous to complain too vigorously when those same foreign governments become good at doing it back.

    Infiltrating? Isn’t that the same as "hacking"? Or, to be semiotically precise, "cracking"?

    Yes, it's a fine world for the West to "infiltrate" Chinese systems because they're just "scanning". The world becomes dangerous (to the present international powers that be, that is) if countries like China begin to be "doing it back". Then the "scanning" becomes "hacking".

    The real danger is a world to be run by a single voice. And the biggest danger is if you can't read between the lines.

     

    About the author:
     

    Zhang Xin is Trainer at chinadaily.com.cn. He has been with China Daily since 1988, when he graduated from Beijing Foreign Studies University. Write him at: zhangxin@chinadaily.com.cn, or raise a question for potential use in a future column.

     
     
    相關文章 Related Stories
     
             
     
     
     
     
     
             

     

     

     
     

    48小時內最熱門

         
      吵架英語三十句
      尼日利亞議長叫停銀行“美女營銷”
      英語和漢語之間的詞匯空缺
      全國開展“無車日”活動
      五個手指怎么說

    本頻道最新推薦

         
      Hocus pocus?
      英語和漢語之間的詞匯空缺
      Greener pasture?
      “江南”怎么譯
      Climate - a problem for all nations

    論壇熱貼

         
       "電視選秀"怎么翻譯?
      how to translate "造星"
      how to translate "特供豬"?
      參加BBC在線競賽 獲免費倫敦游機會!
      how to say "代言"
      “試婚”怎么說






    中文字幕亚洲无线码a| 高清无码在线视频| 久久亚洲AV无码西西人体| 乱人伦人妻中文字幕无码| 精品无码国产污污污免费网站国产 | 中文字幕手机在线观看| 中文字幕无码不卡免费视频| 无码人妻AV免费一区二区三区| 色噜噜狠狠成人中文综合| 国产成人精品无码免费看| 国产成人麻豆亚洲综合无码精品| 中文字幕色婷婷在线视频| 18无码粉嫩小泬无套在线观看| 一夲道无码人妻精品一区二区| 中文字幕在线资源| 中文精品无码中文字幕无码专区| 久久人妻少妇嫩草AV无码蜜桃| 免费无码又爽又刺激高潮视频| 久久人妻无码中文字幕| 最近中文字幕mv免费高清视频8 | 中文字幕日韩精品无码内射| 久久精品无码一区二区app| 无码国产色欲XXXXX视频| 国产AV无码专区亚洲AV手机麻豆| 欧美麻豆久久久久久中文| 久久精品中文闷骚内射| 免费A级毛片无码A∨中文字幕下载| 亚洲色偷拍区另类无码专区| 精品人妻少妇嫩草AV无码专区 | HEYZO无码综合国产精品| 无码人妻AⅤ一区二区三区 | 人妻少妇伦在线无码专区视频| 亚洲精品无码久久千人斩| 伊人久久精品无码二区麻豆| 最近中文2019字幕第二页| 亚洲天堂2017无码中文| 无码av人妻一区二区三区四区 | 精品亚洲成在人线AV无码| 亚洲AV无码一区二区三区牛牛| 中文字幕不卡亚洲| 精品亚洲成A人无码成A在线观看|