久久久无码人妻精品无码_6080YYY午夜理论片中无码_性无码专区_无码人妻品一区二区三区精99

您現在的位置: Language Tips> Columnist> Zhang Xin  
   
 





 
So much for...
What does this headline – So much for Beckham as a voice for MLS (latimes.com, February 12, 2008) – mean?
[ 2008-05-30 10:53 ]


So much for...

Reader question:

What does this headline – So much for Beckham as a voice for MLS (latimes.com, February 12, 2008) – mean?

My comments:

MLS stands for Major League Soccer, the professional soccer league in America. Beckham (David Beckham, otherwise known as the hubby of Posh, one of those Spice Girls. Posh, of course, is also known as the wife of Beckham, all depending on which one of the couple is a bigger name on the occasion) is the former Manchester United and Real Madrid star who is now playing for the Galaxy, a MLS club in Los Angeles. Beckham's move across the seas is seen by many as a great move to advance Posh's singing career, etc, etc, rather than his own – he's going downhill anyway, not so much in bending a free kick but as a player in general. MLS, though, thought Beckham could give the fledgling American league publicity and profile. Yet, you see we're coming to the point, this headline, "So much for Beckham as a voice for MLS" suggests that it is not the case.

Precisely, that headline means this: Beckham is not a voice for MLS, even though people keep saying he is. He's not!

The key expression here is "so much for". Longman Dictionary says the phrase is "used to say that it was not worth using something because it had little effect, it was useless etc: So much for worrying she'd be lonely – she's having a party tonight!"

"So much for something" is often used at an end of an argument, to make an emphatic point. Generally speaking, the expression conveys a message of disappointment, especially over something that's been talked about and held as true for long. In other words, it's like saying "I've had enough" or "stop talking about it," or "that's the end of it."

At any rate, this is another piece of simple but quintessential English that contributes to effective speech and writing. Learn to use it.

But first, let's see more of it in action via media examples. In fact, I've picked three more headlines involving "so much for". Explanations (in brackets) are mine.

1. So much for Free Speech

(According to the article, free speech is no longer a guarantee. It is guaranteed by the First Amendment, and people keep saying that it is guaranteed by the First Amendment but it is not, not in actuality.)

The presidential campaign has confirmed that, under the guise of "campaign finance reform," Congress and the Supreme Court have repealed large parts of the First Amendment. They have simply discarded what were once considered constitutional rights of free speech and political association. It is not that these rights have vanished. But they are no longer constitutional guarantees. They're governed by limits and qualifications imposed by Congress, the courts, state legislatures, regulatory agencies -- and lawyers' interpretations of all of the above.

We have entered an era of constitutional censorship. Hardly anyone wants to admit this -- the legalized demolition of the First Amendment would seem shocking -- and so hardly anyone does. The evidence, though, abounds. The latest is the controversy over the anti-Kerry ads by Swift Boat Veterans for Truth and parallel anti-Bush ads by Democratic "527" groups such as MoveOn.org. Let's assume (for argument's sake) that everything in these ads is untrue. Still, the United States' political tradition is that voters judge the truthfulness and relevance of campaign arguments. We haven't wanted our political speech filtered.

Now there's another possibility. The government may screen what voters see and hear. The Kerry campaign has asked the Federal Election Commission (FEC) to ban the Swift Boat ads; the Bush campaign similarly wants the FEC to suppress the pro-Democrat 527 groups. We've arrived at this juncture because it's logically impossible both to honor the First Amendment and to regulate campaign finance effectively. We can do one or the other -- but not both. Unfortunately, Congress and the Supreme Court won't admit the choice. The result is the worst of both worlds. We gut the First Amendment and don't effectively regulate campaign finance.

The First Amendment says that Congress "shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech, or . . . the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government" (that's "political association"). The campaign finance laws, the latest being McCain-Feingold, blatantly violate these prohibitions. The Supreme Court has tried to evade the contradiction. It has allowed limits on federal campaign contributions. It justifies the limits as preventing "corruption" or "the appearance of corruption." But the court has rejected limits on overall campaign spending by candidates, parties or groups. Limiting spending, the court says, would violate free speech. Spending enables candidates to reach voters through TV and other media.

- washingtonpost.com, August 25, 2004.

2. So much for the Olympic spirit

(According to the article, the London bid is about business and politics, not about upholding the Olympic spirit. Not at all.)

Is Baron de Coubertin birling in his grave? The founder of the modern Olympic Games, he was a high-minded man, dedicated to instilling a sense of nobility of purpose into young people. The baron saw athletic competition as a means of encouraging participants to become the best they could be – not by winning at any cost, but from taking part.

What a pity de Coubertin's honesty and sportsmanship didn't infuse the team of politicians, former gold medallists, and marketing professionals who put together London's Olympics bid. The father of the modern Olympics was ambitious and honest in hi s intentions. The London bid was fraudulent.

Ever since the first PR foray into the Scottish Parliament was led by Lord Seb Coe, some of us, whilst wishing Seb's group no harm, have been deeply troubled by the effects of the London Olympics on Scotland, not all of which are directly related to sport. For example, MSPs were promised that Scottish companies would benefit from the wide range of contracts, service and manufacturing, that would be up for grabs.

- scotsman.com, May 21, 2008.

3. So much for no child left behind

School test scores rise as more low-scoring students drop out.

(According to the article, low-scoring students keep being forced out, this time by low scores. So they should stop talking about no child left behind.)

I thought of Eddie when I was talking with Rice professor Linda McSpadden McNeil, who has co-authored a study showing that the increase in Texas's statewide test scores directly correlates to lower graduation rates.

In fact, it contributes to them, she believes.

Scores have been rising, not because all these students have suddenly mastered the TAKS, but because low-scoring students have been forced out by administrators whose own job success depends on good student scores.

After all, who wants to carry an Eddie on his record?

- houstonpress.com, April 10, 2008.

我要看更多專欄文章

 

About the author:
 

Zhang Xin is Trainer at chinadaily.com.cn. He has been with China Daily since 1988, when he graduated from Beijing Foreign Studies University. Write him at: zhangxin@chinadaily.com.cn, or raise a question for potential use in a future column.

 
英語點津版權說明:凡注明來源為“英語點津:XXX(署名)”的原創作品,除與中國日報網簽署英語點津內容授權協議的網站外,其他任何網站或單位未經允許不得非法盜鏈、轉載和使用,違者必究。如需使用,請與010-84883631聯系;凡本網注明“來源:XXX(非英語點津)”的作品,均轉載自其它媒體,目的在于傳播更多信息,其他媒體如需轉載,請與稿件來源方聯系,如產生任何問題與本網無關;本網所發布的歌曲、電影片段,版權歸原作者所有,僅供學習與研究,如果侵權,請提供版權證明,以便盡快刪除。
相關文章 Related Story
 
 
 
本頻道最新推薦
 
Walking in the US first lady's shoes
“準確無誤”如何表達
英國新晉超女蘇珊大媽改頭換面
豬流感 swine flu
你有lottery mentality嗎
翻吧推薦
 
論壇熱貼
 
別亂扔垃圾。怎么譯這個亂字呀?
橘子,橙子用英文怎么區分?
看Gossip Girl學英語
端午節怎么翻譯?
母親,您在天堂還好嗎?

 

久久久无码人妻精品无码_6080YYY午夜理论片中无码_性无码专区_无码人妻品一区二区三区精99

    午夜dv内射一区二区| 粉色视频免费看| 爱情岛论坛亚洲首页入口章节| 日韩高清在线一区二区| 岛国大片在线播放| 日本精品久久久久久久久久| 波多野结衣乳巨码无在线| 日韩欧美国产片| www.av蜜桃| 在线播放av中文字幕| 欧美视频在线免费播放| 91亚洲免费视频| 免费观看国产精品视频| 涩涩网站在线看| 日韩黄色片视频| 亚洲第一综合网站| 密臀av一区二区三区| 青青青在线视频播放| 亚洲天堂伊人网| 国产成人久久777777| 国产中文字幕乱人伦在线观看| 91福利免费观看| 久久精品午夜福利| 国产一二三在线视频| 特黄特黄一级片| 日本a√在线观看| 99国产精品白浆在线观看免费| 91欧美视频在线| 久久精品免费一区二区| 日韩a级黄色片| 黄色片免费网址| 日日噜噜夜夜狠狠| 精品国产一二三四区| wwwwww欧美| 国产免费一区二区三区四在线播放 | 日本黄色的视频| 国产中文字幕免费观看| av一区二区三区免费观看| 婷婷激情5月天| 日本爱爱免费视频| 狠狠爱免费视频| 午夜精品久久久久久久无码| 国产一二三四五| 午夜大片在线观看| 免费一区二区三区在线观看| 国产一区视频免费观看| 春日野结衣av| 亚洲中文字幕无码专区| 9久久9毛片又大又硬又粗| av女优在线播放| 国产成人在线小视频| 黄色三级中文字幕| 国产视频在线观看网站| 香港三级日本三级a视频| 300部国产真实乱| 老司机午夜网站| 国产免费一区二区三区四在线播放 | 免费看一级大黄情大片| 极品粉嫩国产18尤物| 亚洲国产精品无码观看久久| 欧美日韩dvd| 996这里只有精品| 黄色特一级视频| www.国产在线播放| 欧美国产日韩激情| 一女被多男玩喷潮视频| 无码人妻丰满熟妇区毛片18| 日韩中文字幕组| 天天干天天操天天做| 一级黄色录像在线观看| www激情五月| 国产盗摄视频在线观看| 日韩成人三级视频| 黄页网站在线观看视频| 老熟妇仑乱视频一区二区| www.天天射.com| 一二三av在线| 欧美大黑帍在线播放| 久久精品视频16| 日本中文字幕一级片| a级片一区二区| 很污的网站在线观看| 欧美成人xxxxx| 免费看涩涩视频| 成年人网站av| 日韩一区二区高清视频| 国产精品无码一区二区在线| 日本爱爱免费视频| www亚洲国产| 成人性生活视频免费看| 日韩精品一区二区三区色欲av| 欧美特级aaa| 日韩国产精品毛片| 人妻久久久一区二区三区| 国产视频手机在线播放| 91视频福利网| 成人一对一视频| 精品亚洲一区二区三区四区| 看一级黄色录像| 激情六月丁香婷婷| 17c国产在线| 国产黄色片免费在线观看| 日韩在线第三页| 熟女熟妇伦久久影院毛片一区二区| 日韩视频免费播放| 激情视频免费网站| 91网站在线观看免费| 蜜臀av午夜一区二区三区 | aaa一级黄色片| 国产精品videossex国产高清 | 阿v天堂2017| 91看片破解版| 日本手机在线视频| 手机av在线免费| 国产一区二区网| 99日在线视频| 国产极品粉嫩福利姬萌白酱| 爱豆国产剧免费观看大全剧苏畅 | 久久手机在线视频| 狠狠干狠狠操视频| 日韩在线一级片| 特色特色大片在线| 亚洲综合在线网站| 日韩精品 欧美| 午夜激情影院在线观看| av免费在线播放网站| 国产成人在线小视频| 可以看污的网站| 毛片一区二区三区四区| 国产精品无码免费专区午夜| 污污的视频免费| 国产在线观看福利| 日本xxxxxxxxxx75| 干日本少妇视频| 91视频这里只有精品| 黄色片视频在线免费观看| 国产 欧美 日本| 国产精品久久久久久久99| 国产福利一区视频| 精品这里只有精品| 国产91在线亚洲| 在线观看免费黄色片| 在线看的黄色网址| 国产成人久久777777| 黄色一级视频片| 99热亚洲精品| 欧美极品少妇无套实战| 黄色一级视频播放| 亚洲网中文字幕| 8x8x成人免费视频| 天天色综合社区| 人妻丰满熟妇av无码区app| 日日摸日日碰夜夜爽无码| 免费的一级黄色片| 超级碰在线观看| 精品嫩模一区二区三区| 永久免费在线看片视频| 香蕉精品视频在线| 欧美一级免费在线观看| 成年人网站av| 一级日本黄色片| 6080国产精品| 亚洲一区二区三区四区精品| 午夜一区二区视频| 三日本三级少妇三级99| 一区二区xxx| 91极品视频在线观看| 尤物国产在线观看| 中文字幕22页| 激情文学亚洲色图| 在线免费黄色小视频| 99热都是精品| 老司机午夜网站| 人妻激情另类乱人伦人妻| 欧美黄网在线观看| 无码 制服 丝袜 国产 另类| 国产精品12345| 激情综合在线观看| 青青青在线播放| 黑人粗进入欧美aaaaa| 亚洲免费一级视频| 亚洲精品在线网址| 欧美日韩亚洲国产成人| 日本a在线天堂| 丁香花在线影院观看在线播放| 又粗又黑又大的吊av| 国产福利一区视频| 亚洲精品20p| 日本老太婆做爰视频| 精品少妇在线视频| 国产精品第12页| 五月天视频在线观看| 国产高清不卡无码视频| 成人午夜精品久久久久久久蜜臀| 国产在线青青草| 亚欧美在线观看| 最近中文字幕免费mv| 三上悠亚久久精品| 午夜在线观看av| 色乱码一区二区三区熟女|