久久久无码人妻精品无码_6080YYY午夜理论片中无码_性无码专区_无码人妻品一区二区三区精99

 
 
 

Trigger warning?

中國日報網 2017-12-22 11:24

 

Trigger warning?Reader question:

Please explain the term “trigger warning”.

My comments:

Content warning, in other words.

“Trigger warning” is a relatively new term, an Internet-era coinage, something largely unheard of 20 years ago.

Anyways, today, at the beginning of a story online, we often see a content warning, such as this:

Warning: This interview contains strong language (i.e. curse words which may be unsuitable for children).

Or this:

Warning: This video may contain violence and graphics that are not suitable for people with heart conditions.

In the second case, that content warning is a trigger warning.

Trigger?

Trigger, as in “pull the trigger” to fire a gunshot.

Literally, trigger warning is a warning against certain language or image that may trigger some reaction in the viewer, usually something unpleasant.

For example, people with heart conditions may not be suitable to watch a film of extreme violence, which may give them a heart attack. Hence, a warning before hand is helpful and may do a great deal of good. They may choose to stop or at least they are alerted and may get mentally prepared if they choose to go on watching.

Or someone who has a traumatic childhood may find it difficult to watch a film or view a picture of children being beaten by adults. It may cause them incontrollable pain.

Or, for another example, a guilty war veteran may not want to watch a war film that features a lot of senseless killings. Such a film may trigger remembrances of their own experiences in combat.

In all of the above cases, a content warning about possible offensive or upsetting material is called a trigger warning, because it may trigger (cause) viewer discomfort.

Discomfort is putting it mildly, of course. It may be much worse.

Alright?

All right. No more ado, let’s read a few media examples to help us see “trigger warning” or “trigger warnings” in action and understand them better – via context:

1. Under the guise of trying to protect students from speech that they may find uncomfortable or offensive, there is a growing trend of rules and policies being put into place on college campuses that stifle debate, conversation, and learning.

For example, some college professors now provide “trigger warnings,” which aim to alert students about course content that they may find traumatic. Some colleges offer “safe spaces,” where students can go if they are troubled by a particular intellectual debate or conversation that is occurring on campus. And some colleges preemptively shut down free discussion by withdrawing commencement speaking invitations from prominent figures after upset students protest those figures for having different views.

What these efforts have in common is that they allow students to avoid reading or hearing ideas they find troubling. The systematic silencing that is occurring on campus teaches the next generation of leaders that the best way to deal with ideas with which they disagree is to declare the content offensive, disengage from the discussion, ignore the ideas, and force others to do the same by shutting down the conversation.

But a growing number of people are now questioning whether college students really benefit when they are taught to avoid contentious debates like ostriches burying their heads in the sand.

Credit none other than President Barack Obama, himself a former professor, for warning about the problem of the stifling of intellectual diversity on college campuses and the coddling of liberal college students.

At an appearance in Iowa, the President criticized the trend of campuses denying conservative speakers the opportunity to be heard and acknowledged the value of engaging with different viewpoints. “[A]nybody who comes to speak to you and you disagree with, you should have an argument with them,” Obama urged. He continued, “But you shouldn’t silence them by saying, you can’t come because I’m too sensitive to hear what you have to say. That’s not the way we learn, either.”

He is right. Protecting students from ideas that they may disagree with ultimately is a disservice to the students themselves, denying them the opportunity to consider, confront, and learn from differing opinions.

- Trigger Warning: Obama Criticizes The Language Police On College Campuses, Forbes.com, October 30, 2015.

2. As educators and students suited up for the fall semester last month, University of Chicago dean of students John Ellison sent a provocative letter to incoming freshmen about all the cushioning policies they should not expect at their new school. “We do not support so-called ‘trigger warnings,’ we do not cancel invited speakers because their topics might prove controversial, and we do not condone the creation of intellectual ‘safe spaces’ where individuals can retreat from ideas and perspectives at odds with their own,” Ellison wrote.

Ellison’s pre-emptive strike against trigger warnings, or alerts that professors might stamp on coursework that could provoke a strong emotional response, was the latest salvo in a yearslong and stormy conversation on college campuses—a kind of agon between “free speech” and “safe spaces.” The University of Chicago missive seemed to plant a flag in the former camp, declaring itself a Political Correctness Avenger, its cape of First Amendment verities fluttering in the wind.

Its side of the debate insists that students have embraced an ethos of personal fragility—that they are infantilizing themselves by overreacting to tiny slights. A splashy Atlantic cover story from September 2015 on the “coddling of the American mind” argued that universities were playacting at PTSD, co-opting the disorder’s hypersensitivity and hypervigilance. The other side protests administrators’ lack of awareness of marginalized groups; these students say they seek more inclusive, responsive, and enlightened spaces for learning. For them, the “tiny slights” have a name—microaggressions—and a high cost. They accumulate like a swarm of poisonous bee stings. As one outgoing college senior at American University told the Washington Post in May, “I don’t think it’s outrageous for me to want my campus to be better than the world around it. … I think that makes me a good person.”

The Atlantic piece cited Chinua Achebe’s Things Fall Apart and F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby as two classic texts that have stirred calls for trigger warnings due to their racially motivated violence and domestic abuse, respectively. Students at Rutgers in 2014 beseeched a professor to append a trigger warning to descriptions of suicidal thinking in Mrs. Dalloway; students at Columbia did the same in 2015 for scenes of sexual assault in Ovid’s Metamorphoses. In some cases, the flags are meant to shepherd students away from high-voltage material; in others, they simply advise readers to be prepared. Often derided or ironized online by concerned citizens (and especially by free speech advocates), they are a response to something real: Scientists agree that triggers can awaken dormant memories and hijack the rational control board of the cortex, drowning awareness of the present moment in eddies of panic.

As Ali Vingiano recounts for BuzzFeed, trigger warnings were born not in the ivory tower but on the lady-blogosphere, where they prefaced message-board postings about topics like self-harm, eating disorders, and sexual assault. The advisory labels swam to LiveJournal in the early aughts, then spread across Tumblr, Twitter, and Facebook. By 2012, they speckled such feminist sites as Bitch, Shakesville, and xoJane, creating protective force fields around articles that touched on everything from depression to aggressive dogs. These internet “heads up” notes allowed vulnerable readers to tread lightly through and around subjects that reignited their pain. But they also acquired a sanctimonious, performative aura. “As practiced in the real world,” Amanda Marcotte wrote in Slate last year, “the trigger warning is less about preventive mental health care and more about social signaling of liberal credentials.”

Similarly, the vaudeville toughness of Ellison’s letter felt designed more to make a cultural point than to edify students. Enacted correctly, the measures Ellison invokes are not supposed to constrict academic horizons. They are meant to secure for minority students the same freedoms to speak and explore that white male students have enjoyed for decades.

- The Trapdoor of Trigger Words, Slate.com, September 5, 2016.

3. NPR Ed sent out a survey last fall to faculty members at colleges and universities around the country. We focused specifically on the types of institutions most students attend — not the elite private universities most often linked to the “trigger warning” idea.

We received more than 800 responses, and this month as the issue once again made headlines we followed up with some of those professors.

Here are some of our key findings:

About half of professors said they've used a trigger warning in advance of introducing potentially difficult material.

Most said they did so of their own volition, not because of a student’s request or an administrative policy.

...

Let’s define terms.

The term “trigger” in this sense originates in psychology, where it pertains to people with a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder. For survivors of combat violence, sexual abuse or other trauma, certain sights, sounds, smells or other reminders can bring on intense emotional and even physical reactions, like a full-blown panic attack.

In the media and elsewhere online, language similar to trigger warnings is often used more broadly to label material that concerns sexual abuse or sexual assault, that is potentially racially or politically offensive, or graphically violent or sexual. For example, when NPR covered the fatal shooting by police of Philando Castile, an African-American resident of the Minneapolis area, we included these words: “We’ll embed the video here, with the warning that it contains images and language that viewers might find disturbing.”

But the rules are different in a college classroom than in a therapeutic setting, and both are different than when addressing a general audience. Even some of our respondents who had supplied a form of trigger warning as a “courtesy” or “heads-up” said they didn’t intend to give students a free pass to avoid uncomfortable topics.

In fact, the picture that emerges is of professors making private decisions within the four walls of the classroom. Only 3.4 percent said students had requested such a warning. Most instructors who told us they'd used trigger warnings — 64.7 percent — did so because, they said, “I thought the material needed one.”

So what are the types of material that are most likely to trigger a trigger warning?

Our respondents were most likely to say they had used trigger warnings in reference to sexual or violent material. Racially, politically, or religiously charged topics were mentioned less often.

“I have had students break down reading novels depicting sexual assault and incest in my gender studies courses,” a professor at the University of North Carolina said in a survey response.

Joanna Hunter, who teaches sociology at Radford University in Virginia, told NPR Ed last week that she has given a warning before explaining the practice of female genital mutilation, within the broader context of a discussion of cultural relativism.

Lauren Griffith, a professor of ethnology at Texas Tech University, said that she gave warnings when teaching Native American students whose religious beliefs required that they undergo a form of ritual purification upon viewing images of death. However, she says, outside of such specific situations, she doesn't believe that trigger warnings best serve the cause of liberal education: “I think that trigger warnings can and should be used in a limited number of situations, but overusing them can create a situation in which students opt out of learning experiences simply because they don’t want to confront their own assumptions about the world.”

- Half Of Professors In NPR Ed Survey Have Used ‘Trigger Warnings’, NPR.org, September 7, 2016.

本文僅代表作者本人觀點,與本網立場無關。歡迎大家討論學術問題,尊重他人,禁止人身攻擊和發布一切違反國家現行法律法規的內容。

About the author:

Zhang Xin is Trainer at chinadaily.com.cn. He has been with China Daily since 1988, when he graduated from Beijing Foreign Studies University. Write him at: zhangxin@chinadaily.com.cn, or raise a question for potential use in a future column.

(作者:張欣 編輯:丹妮)

上一篇 : Slap in the face
下一篇 : Identity politics

 
中國日報網英語點津版權說明:凡注明來源為“中國日報網英語點津:XXX(署名)”的原創作品,除與中國日報網簽署英語點津內容授權協議的網站外,其他任何網站或單位未經允許不得非法盜鏈、轉載和使用,違者必究。如需使用,請與010-84883561聯系;凡本網注明“來源:XXX(非英語點津)”的作品,均轉載自其它媒體,目的在于傳播更多信息,其他媒體如需轉載,請與稿件來源方聯系,如產生任何問題與本網無關;本網所發布的歌曲、電影片段,版權歸原作者所有,僅供學習與研究,如果侵權,請提供版權證明,以便盡快刪除。

中國日報網雙語新聞

掃描左側二維碼

添加Chinadaily_Mobile
你想看的我們這兒都有!

中國日報雙語手機報

點擊左側圖標查看訂閱方式

中國首份雙語手機報
學英語看資訊一個都不能少!

關注和訂閱

本文相關閱讀
人氣排行
熱搜詞
 
精華欄目
 

閱讀

詞匯

視聽

翻譯

口語

合作

 

關于我們 | 聯系方式 | 招聘信息

Copyright by chinadaily.com.cn. All rights reserved. None of this material may be used for any commercial or public use. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. 版權聲明:本網站所刊登的中國日報網英語點津內容,版權屬中國日報網所有,未經協議授權,禁止下載使用。 歡迎愿意與本網站合作的單位或個人與我們聯系。

電話:8610-84883645

傳真:8610-84883500

Email: languagetips@chinadaily.com.cn

久久久无码人妻精品无码_6080YYY午夜理论片中无码_性无码专区_无码人妻品一区二区三区精99

    无码aⅴ精品一区二区三区浪潮| 色网站在线视频| 午夜免费视频网站| 成年人网站免费视频| 182午夜在线观看| 国产精品333| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久动漫| 91专区在线观看| 最新av免费在线观看| 国产1区2区在线| 成人在线免费高清视频| 精品综合久久久久| 国产日产欧美视频| youjizz.com在线观看| www.久久久久久久久久久| 成人免费观看视频在线观看| 久久av高潮av| xxx中文字幕| 中文字幕视频三区| 丰满少妇被猛烈进入高清播放| 粉嫩av一区二区三区天美传媒 | 99草草国产熟女视频在线| 欧美中文字幕在线观看视频| 91视频这里只有精品| 国产亚洲精品网站| 精品少妇一区二区三区在线| www.国产二区| 日韩video| 91社在线播放| 日韩av福利在线观看| 不卡的av中文字幕| 精品久久久久久中文字幕2017| 99精品人妻少妇一区二区| 免费网站在线观看视频| 第九区2中文字幕| 99中文字幕在线观看| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃| 国产精品视频中文字幕| 一区二区三区国产免费| 中文字幕乱码人妻综合二区三区| 日韩a∨精品日韩在线观看| 欧美一区二区激情| www.日本在线播放| 成品人视频ww入口| 日韩xxxx视频| 欧美三级在线观看视频| 国产日韩av网站| 日韩在线综合网| 欧美激情成人网| 久久久久狠狠高潮亚洲精品| 日韩在线xxx| 韩国中文字幕av| 亚洲最大天堂网| 在线观看中文av| 黄色一级视频播放| 国产一级大片免费看| 欧美一区二区三区综合| 成人精品视频在线播放| 激情综合在线观看| 黄色一级二级三级| 天堂在线中文在线| 成年人视频大全| 亚洲国产成人精品无码区99| 北条麻妃69av| 在线观看av日韩| www.51色.com| 老司机激情视频| 欧美 丝袜 自拍 制服 另类| 久久人妻精品白浆国产| 日本不卡一区二区在线观看| 精品国产乱码久久久久久1区二区| avove在线观看| 日韩中文字幕在线视频观看 | 在线观看av免费观看| 日本丰满大乳奶| av女优在线播放| 欧洲av无码放荡人妇网站| 在线观看的毛片| 欧洲美女和动交zoz0z| 99热久久这里只有精品| 欧美精品无码一区二区三区| 五月天开心婷婷| 欧美日韩中文字幕在线播放 | 欧美精品色视频| 一卡二卡三卡视频| 天堂社区在线视频| 黄色录像特级片| 久久久久久久久久久久久国产精品| 三上悠亚在线一区| 99久热在线精品视频| 1024av视频| 五月花丁香婷婷| 波多野结衣综合网| 国产一级免费大片| 欧美,日韩,国产在线| 男人的天堂最新网址| 国产av人人夜夜澡人人爽麻豆| 少妇人妻互换不带套| 国产一二三四五| 午夜视频在线瓜伦| www.亚洲成人网| 色婷婷一区二区三区av免费看| 日本wwwcom| 8x8x成人免费视频| 国产乱子伦农村叉叉叉| 亚洲一区二区图片| 国产女女做受ⅹxx高潮| 国产精品igao激情视频| 中文字幕天天干| 少妇人妻大乳在线视频| 亚洲欧美天堂在线| www.国产区| 男人天堂av片| 天天色天天干天天色| 国产精品少妇在线视频| av网站大全免费| 中文字幕超清在线免费观看| 国产嫩草在线观看| 凹凸国产熟女精品视频| 四虎精品欧美一区二区免费| 亚洲77777| 三级4级全黄60分钟| 欧美午夜性视频| 91精品一区二区三区四区| 加勒比av中文字幕| 国产免费视频传媒| 国产精品裸体瑜伽视频| 真人做人试看60分钟免费| 潘金莲激情呻吟欲求不满视频| 亚洲国产精品久久久久爰色欲| 996这里只有精品| 一道本在线观看视频| 亚洲欧洲日本精品| 日韩一级免费在线观看| 国产精品裸体瑜伽视频| 欧美黑人在线观看| 亚洲av综合色区| 欧美日韩亚洲国产成人| 伊人免费视频二| 亚洲妇熟xx妇色黄蜜桃| 男操女免费网站| 日本熟妇人妻中出| 免费黄色特级片| 成熟老妇女视频| 国产精品wwwww| 黑森林福利视频导航| 久久精品免费一区二区| 无码播放一区二区三区| 黄页网站大全在线观看| 五月丁香综合缴情六月小说| 成人在线国产视频| 性一交一乱一伧国产女士spa| 国产在线视频在线| 福利视频免费在线观看| 国产一级做a爰片久久毛片男| 水蜜桃在线免费观看| 黄色小视频大全| 欧美交换配乱吟粗大25p| 日韩精品免费一区| 国产欧美久久久久| 国产二区视频在线| 国产视频一视频二| 免费在线观看的毛片| 久久久久久久少妇| 无尽裸体动漫2d在线观看| 视频二区在线播放| 涩多多在线观看| 青青在线免费视频| 无码人妻少妇伦在线电影| 成人网站免费观看入口| 国产成人黄色片| 老司机午夜av| 日本高清一区二区视频| 日本女人高潮视频| 99色这里只有精品| 日韩精品一区二区三区色欲av| 蜜臀视频一区二区三区| 亚洲色图偷拍视频| 激情五月五月婷婷| 日日摸日日碰夜夜爽无码| 国产a视频免费观看| 182午夜在线观看| 性生活免费观看视频| 很污的网站在线观看| 日本新janpanese乱熟| 亚洲在线观看网站| 国产美女在线一区| 9久久婷婷国产综合精品性色| 久久精品久久99| 国产情侣第一页| 免费日韩中文字幕| 黄色a级三级三级三级| 黄色一级片在线看| 国产熟人av一二三区| 成人性做爰片免费视频| 国产在线青青草| 肉色超薄丝袜脚交| 国产视频九色蝌蚪| 成人不卡免费视频| 2019日韩中文字幕mv|