久久久无码人妻精品无码_6080YYY午夜理论片中无码_性无码专区_无码人妻品一区二区三区精99

   
 
Reanalysis of Limitations and Exceptions to the Right of Network Dissemination of Information under Local Area Network Environment
(China IP)
Updated: 2012-12-25

Ⅰ.The case for discussion

Case No.: (2011) DongMinChuZi No.04558 (first instance)

Case No.: (2011) ErZhongMinZhongZi No. 16561 (second instance)

Case brief: In this case, Beijing Forbidden City Film Co., Ltd. (Forbidden City) holds the exclusive right of network dissemination of information in three films including Be There or Be Square ; The Forestry Service Southwest Aerial Center under the State Forestry Administration (Forestry Service) offered for online viewing, without permission, said films in question in its video system of its official website; therefore Forbidden City filed the suit, alleging infringement by the Forestry Service of its lawful right to network dissemination of information. However, The Forestry Service denied the allegation, for the reason, it contended, that its website was not open to the public, and merely for non-profit purposes without commercial gains.

The determination: The court of first instance found infringement of Forbidden City’s right of network dissemination of information by the Forestry Service who, being the webhost of the offending website, offered the films in question for public viewing on its website, whereby internet users were able to view the films at a time and a computer terminal of their choice.

The court of second instance concluded further that any act of dissemination of another’s copyrighted work, so long as the act is unauthorized, would constitute infringement under the copyright law, even if the website in question was non-profit, for which the actor must be held liable for injunction and damages.

ⅡSome thoughts derived from the case

The "type" of network has never been defined, either in international conventions or in domestic laws of China, such as the Copyright Law, or the Regulation on Protection of the Right to Network Dissemination of Information (Regulation), which, according to some scholars,

Reanalysis of Limitations and Exceptions to the Right of Network Dissemination of Information under Local Area Network Environment

李鳴

 indicates that it is applicable to any network. The authors believe otherwise, for following reasons:

1.The right to network dissemination of information is developed as a result of the needs of the time. One of the most important things in our time is the emergence and rapid popularization of the Internet, which makes it very easy for any person to copy and disseminate works, which is a serious threat to the interests of the right holders. The accessibility and general popularization of the Internet have made it a hot arena between right holders and users for interests. That is to say, the right to network dissemination of information was originally designed for the regulation of the use and dissemination of works on Internet. Thus the local area network (LAN) was not necessarily targeted in the in the original category.

2.It has been especially stressed in the Advisory Opinion (I) On The Several Issues Concerning Cyberspace Copyright Cases (Provisional) issued by the Beijing Higher People’s Court that "it shall be an act of network dissemination of information to place a work, by uploading or otherwise, onto a local area network accessible to the public." Judged by the language itself, isn’t it redundant, had it been necessarily included in the definitional category of the right of dissemination of information, that the concept of local area network is redefined? Or perhaps, this provision is singled out for clarification precisely because of the uncertainty of the nature of the local area network.

3.It can be seen from the judicial practice in recent years that many courts have heard a class of cases involving commercial Internet cafes and others which were related to the distribution of works on LAN. These cases have been cited as references for discussion in this regard. However, there has been a gradually neglect of the possible important influence of the concept of LAN technology and its extensiveness on the judgment. LAN is a group of computers interconnected in a particular region. It may include hundreds or even thousands of computers for a large enterprise, or just several computers in a small office. It is obviously that there are huge differences between them in terms of the impact and consequences resulting from their dissemination of works. Thus, when identifying the nature of such distribution, it should take into account the usage, scale, number of terminals of the LAN and other factors.

III. The boundary for the right to network dissemination of information on LAN

The limitations on and exceptions of copyright are not coincidental with the emergence of the rights; nor are they static. On the contrary, they have been changed with the technological development and the time. In the opinion of the authors, there has been a gradual expansion of such limitations and exceptions in general. In terms of the right to network dissemination of information for example, the right shall be extended to the LAN where there is a regulation on the dissemination of works on LAN.

1.The outer boundary of copyright in digital environment

The earliest limitations and exceptions were recognized under the Berne Convention (Convention). The rule of exception was introduced to match the concept of the generalized exclusive right to reproduction in the formulation of Stockholm text of the Convention. Later on, the content of the Convention was included in TRIPs. It has not only served as the minimum standards of copyright protection to be abided by all contracting parties, but also broadens the scope of the right of reproduction of which the three-step test applies only, extending the limitations and exceptions to the exclusive rights enjoyed by the copyright owner.

The WIPO Copyright Treaty and the WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty are the most representative international convention for the protection of copyright in the era of digital technology or the Internet. In addition to the basic protection under the Convention, the two conventions clearly stipulate that the limitations and exceptions shall be maintained in the era of digital technology. As far as the digital network is concerned, the Internet treaties leave it for contracting parties to make provisions, a larger room to have more and new limitations and exceptions in comparison with the Convention and TRIPs.

Reanalysis of Limitations and Exceptions to the Right of Network Dissemination of Information under Local Area Network Environment

馬云鵬

2.The right to network dissemination of information on LAN

China’s Copyright Law introduced the right to network dissemination of information in 2001 amendment. However, it has no corresponding limitations and exceptions. Though there are 12 kinds of exceptions to copyright and neighboring right according to Article 22 under China’s Copyright Law, there is no special stipulation concerning the limitations on and exceptions of the right involving network, and leaves it to be specified in the Regulation. Several problems have resulted from the practice.

aArticle 6 and 7 of the Regulation provide for fair use in network environment. If Article 22 of Copyright Law was transformed into Article 6 of the Regulation and extended to cover information network, then Article 7 of the Regulation related to the LAN of digital library cannot be traced to the Copyright Law.

b. Article 6 of the Regulation enumerates 8 kinds of limitations on and exceptions of the right to network dissemination of information. However, they are enumerated without a generalization despite that they followed the suit with the Copyright Law. The closed legislative method will not only limit the court’s interpretation of rational use, but also run contrary to development of copyright Law.

3.The application of the three-step test

Under the LAN, we should not rigidly adhere to the existing framework, but make explanation to suit the times in the face of the increasingly complex environment of digital technology development. As far as judicial practice is concerned, it is in these authors’ opinion that the classic criteria— three-step test should be the most important basis to judge the rational use when indentifying the nature of dissemination of works on LAN.

a.The application of three-step test

Article 21 of Implementing Regulations of the Copyright Law of the People's Republic of China stipulates that "the use of published works with no need permission from copyright owner by provisions concerned of the Copyright Law shall not harm the normal exploitation of the work concerned and shall not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the copyright owner."

b.The meaning of "certain special circumstances"

We think that the act of disseminating works on LAN may fall within the fair use under "certain special circumstances" in judicial practice. Some scholars argue that this step has no significance, that it is unnecessary to spend too much time on specifying its meaning, and that the three-step test has two steps in essence.

According to this logic, it is the two latter criteria of the three-step test that have a substantial role to play in the determination of whether an act constitutes rational use or not. Where a certain act satisfies the two latter criteria, it shall be under "certain special circumstances" and there is no need to take into account a separate provision for special circumstances. When it comes to LAN cases, we may not focus on the environment of dissemination, namely, the type of network. We should reach a conclusion that such act does not fall within rational use where the dissemination of work on LAN is contrary to the legal use, and irrationally impair the legal interest of the obligee. Otherwise, there should be no infringement.

Firstly, there is a discussion about whether the right to network dissemination of information can be extended to the LAN. The main dispute is that the different understanding of the place and time the individual choose to have access to the work. The dominant position is that the place and time the public choose to have access to the work can not be explained that the individual may freely choose any corner at any time. As long as he can choose a time and place at his will, the act of network dissemination of information should be ascertained.

LAN is different from Internet in its closeness and limitation and controllability of the number of its terminal users and coverage. Therefore, the same network dissemination of information has different consequence on LAN and internet and so does their nature. The different type of LANs has different influence on the nature of such dissemination. The top factors should be the nature of the unit, the number of terminal computers of the LAN involved, the nature of the film, and other factors. It should be born in mind that there should be no indiscriminative exclusion of all types of LANs to the rational use of works in practice.

Secondly is the introduction of the De Minis Doctrine. De Minis is a Latin proverb which means "of minimum importance" or "trifling." Essentially, it refers to something or a difference that is so little, small, minuscule, or tiny that the law does not refer to it and will not consider it. There is no clear stipulation under China’s laws. However, it is in conformity with China’s laws and regulations in legislative purposes.

In fact, it is easier to have a right included in the law than to safeguard it according to law. The right holders shall benefit more from pretty rights and shy limits than users and consumers. An example was cited by a scholar in this regard. It shall be undoubtedly an unfair system design where a poor and weak sale of sugar-coated haws shall pay for his play of music work for peddling. Similarly, a non-governmental organization (NGO) sets up a LAN at a poor village in a small mountain and upload literary works and films for villagers to learn through several terminals provided by the NGO for free charge. If such act can not be exempted from the law for rational use, it shall obviously be contrary to the purpose of copyright’s dissemination of social and cultural wealth. Therefore, where the legislation lags behind the development and need of times, our judges should take full advantage of an instructive and flexible tool, and hold meaningful trial.

ⅣConclusion

We have enjoyed much convenience from the rapid progress of digital technology, which has influenced our copyright law system. It has added more fluctuation to the originally fragile and sensitive balance of interest between obligee and the public under copyright law. All these factors and the lag of legislation in have forced the courts to be cautious and focus more on the balance of interest between parties. In judicial practice, court have made some judgments that the act of disseminating of work on LAN may be ascertained as network dissemination of information and that there should be rational limitations and exceptions where the right to network dissemination of information be extended to LAN.

(Translated by Yuan Renhui)



The J-Innovation

Steve Jobs died the month that the latest Nobel Prize winners were announced. The coincidence lends itself to speculation about inevitability.

Volunteer team bails out busy court

Government supports unique intellectual property fund

IP service providers showcase products

Experts call for standardization of IP services

久久久无码人妻精品无码_6080YYY午夜理论片中无码_性无码专区_无码人妻品一区二区三区精99

    能在线观看的av| 今天免费高清在线观看国语| 日本美女高潮视频| 99re在线视频免费观看| 国内外成人激情视频| 国内自拍第二页| 无码人妻aⅴ一区二区三区日本| 在线免费av播放| 亚欧美在线观看| 欧美激情成人网| 成人精品视频一区二区| 欧美丝袜在线观看| 婷婷免费在线观看| 免费看污污视频| 91猫先生在线| 97在线播放视频| 五月天国产视频| 人人爽人人爽av| 青青艹视频在线| 99视频精品全部免费看| 日本a级片免费观看| 潘金莲一级淫片aaaaa免费看| 国产精品亚洲a| 国产成人免费高清视频| 一区二区免费av| 久久久精品高清| 999热精品视频| 国产高清av片| 色哟哟精品视频| 红桃av在线播放| 天天干天天玩天天操| 青青草免费在线视频观看| 欧美精品自拍视频| 国产一级不卡毛片| 天天干天天操天天干天天操| 香蕉视频色在线观看| 少妇高潮毛片色欲ava片| 久久久久久久9| 在线视频日韩欧美| 分分操这里只有精品| 999在线观看视频| 欧洲美女亚洲激情| 一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 婷婷五月综合缴情在线视频| 在线观看免费av网址| 一级全黄肉体裸体全过程| 国产极品尤物在线| 97av中文字幕| 国产又大又黄又猛| 久艹视频在线免费观看| 亚洲天堂第一区| 青青在线免费视频| 小泽玛利亚av在线| 潘金莲一级淫片aaaaaa播放1| 交换做爰国语对白| 日韩在线一区视频| 网站在线你懂的| 亚洲综合20p| 欧美一级特黄aaa| 日韩av影视大全| 国产美女视频免费看| 高潮一区二区三区| 天天综合成人网| 国产传媒免费观看| 亚洲成人动漫在线| 国产精品免费看久久久无码| 青春草国产视频| 日本中文字幕网址| 国产欧美精品一二三| 污视频在线观看免费网站| www.激情网| 中文字幕线观看| 天天操天天爽天天射| 北条麻妃在线一区| 国产一级片黄色| 九色91popny| 污污动漫在线观看| 欧美丝袜在线观看| a级片一区二区| 毛片在线视频播放| 亚洲色精品三区二区一区| 色综合天天色综合| 黄色三级视频在线播放| 国产一区二区视频播放| 日韩国产欧美亚洲| 日本精品www| 国产精品一区二区小说| 波多野结衣激情| 激情五月宗合网| 天堂网在线免费观看| 99久re热视频精品98| 欧美精品一区二区三区三州| 日韩一级在线免费观看| 一级黄色高清视频| 97中文字幕在线| 欧美精品第三页| 亚洲免费视频播放| 少妇无码av无码专区在线观看 | 91高清国产视频| 国产精品波多野结衣| 国产二级片在线观看| 色戒在线免费观看| 999久久欧美人妻一区二区| 黄色片视频在线| 天堂av手机在线| 成人在线观看你懂的| 91插插插插插插插插| 国产91视频一区| 成年网站在线免费观看| 国产精品99久久久久久大便| 日韩精品一区二区三区久久| 亚洲欧美日韩一二三区| jizzjizz国产精品喷水| 麻豆一区二区三区视频| 日本a在线免费观看| 波多野结衣在线免费观看| 欧美在线观看www| 午夜久久久久久久久久久| 欧美伦理视频在线观看| av动漫在线免费观看| www.久久91| 男女高潮又爽又黄又无遮挡| 香蕉视频在线网址| 欧美日韩一区二区在线免费观看| 18视频在线观看娇喘| 手机看片福利日韩| www.夜夜爱| 午夜久久福利视频| 能在线观看的av网站| av高清在线免费观看| 8x8x华人在线| 成人亚洲免费视频| 草草草在线视频| 日本www在线视频| 777久久精品一区二区三区无码| 日本精品www| 黄色一级视频片| 精品一区二区三区无码视频| www.偷拍.com| 999久久久精品视频| 亚洲一区二区三区四区五区xx| 妞干网在线视频观看| www.欧美黄色| 亚洲天堂第一区| 日本特级黄色大片| 特黄视频免费观看| 国内外成人免费在线视频| 九色porny91| 老头吃奶性行交视频| 免费看国产曰批40分钟| 污色网站在线观看| 苍井空浴缸大战猛男120分钟| 国产超级av在线| 日韩精品视频在线观看视频| 日韩视频一二三| 手机在线视频你懂的| 天堂av免费看| 国产永久免费网站| 亚洲欧洲日本精品| 成人性生交免费看| 在线黄色免费观看| 精品人妻一区二区三区四区在线 | www一区二区www免费| 精品视频在线观看一区| 免费高清一区二区三区| 日韩久久久久久久久久久久| 在线观看成人免费| 欧美这里只有精品| 欧美精品自拍视频| 欧美日韩亚洲一| 日韩欧美精品在线观看视频| 国内外成人激情视频| www.欧美日本| 成人性生交免费看| 日日躁夜夜躁aaaabbbb| 91欧美一区二区三区| 天天在线免费视频| 久操网在线观看| 国产免费成人在线| 日本xxxx黄色| 黄色免费高清视频| 日韩精品一区二区在线视频| 少妇人妻无码专区视频| 不卡影院一区二区| 一级黄色香蕉视频| 老司机午夜av| 亚洲色图欧美自拍| 日本黄色片一级片| www.国产区| 国产传媒免费观看| 欧美中日韩在线| 日日碰狠狠躁久久躁婷婷| 岛国av免费在线| 91视频 - 88av| 国产综合免费视频| 国产精品久久久久久久99| 青草视频在线观看视频| 欧美 日本 亚洲| 国产精品视频黄色| 美国av在线播放|