Kasite trademark sours for French vintner Castel
    By Zhang Zhao(China Daily)
    Updated: 2013-08-07

    Kasite trademark sours for French vintner Castel

    Ordered to pay almost 34m yuan in infringement

    After a four-year battle, a Chinese company recently prevailed over a noted French vintner to win the largest trademark lawsuit in the wine industry to date.

    The Higher People's Court in Zhejiang ruled that Castel Freres SAS must pay 33.73 million yuan ($5.5 million) to distributor Panati Wine (Shanghai) Co for using its Chinese trademark without authorization.

    In addition, it is also required to issue a public apology in the newspaper China Industry & Commerce News.

    The saga dates back to when Wenzhou-born Spanish-Chinese entrepreneur Li Daozhi started Panati Wine in 1997 to bring Spanish wines to the Chinese market as one of the nation's first wine importers.

    The company applied for the trademark Cavesmaitre in 1998 for its imported wine, which was approved in 2000. The corresponding Chinese name is Kasite.

    Panati then founded a subsidiary called Cavesmaitre Wine Co in 2008, also in Shanghai, mainly importing French wines.

    Cavesmaitre was granted the status of well-known trademark in China last year, the fifth liquor-related brand to receive the title following Chivas, Remy Martin, Martell and Hennessey, according to a report on the website of the 21st Century Business Herald.

    The company also has purchased three chateaus in France, all in Bordeaux.

    For its part, Castel started bottling wine in China in 1999. There have been many versions of its name translated into Chinese, with Kasite among the most popular.

    In 2005, Castel filed an application with the national trademark administration to revoke Panati's Kasite trademark, claiming that it had not been used for three years.

    The Chinese company failed to receive the notice from the administration because it moved to a new location, so the cancellation succeeded. But Panati won the trademark back just a few months later.

    Li filed lawsuit against Castel in 2009 asking for 40 million yuan in compensation. The Intermediate People's Court in Wenzhou ruled in his favor, asking Castel to pay 33.73 million yuan. But both the plaintiff and the defendant filed appeals.

    On July 16, the higher court upheld the Wenzhou court's verdict.

    Although Castel has decided to abandon the Kasite name and launch the new Chinese trademark Kasidaile, its president for the Chinese market Yin Kai said the French winemaker was wronged.

    He told Guangzhou's Yangcheng Evening News that his company "actually never used Kasite as an official trademark", saying that it only appeared as part of the Chinese translation of the company name.

    He also questioned the amount of compensation, noting that Cavesmaitre "has seldom used the Kasite trademark" but the court attributed all of Castel's profit to infringement.

    Beijing Business Today quoted Li as saying "Cavesmaitre will continue employing legal methods to fight overseas infringement while cooperating with domestic law enforcement to clear up the market and retailers".

    Wang Hua, dean of the College of Enology at Northwest A&F University, said "Castel will have to pay a high price for a mistake it made when it entered the Chinese market".

    "It is a historical regret for Castel to not obtain the Kasite trademark," he said.

    But a report in the Yangcheng Evening News noted that Castel actually once had a chance.

    It said that Li was willing to transfer the trademark to Castel in 2003 for 1 million yuan. But the two sides failed to reach an agreement because the price was raised to 1 million euros ($1.3 million) in later negotiations.

    zhangzhao@chinadaily.com.cn

    (China Daily 08/07/2013 page17)



    The J-Innovation

    Steve Jobs died the month that the latest Nobel Prize winners were announced. The coincidence lends itself to speculation about inevitability.

    Volunteer team bails out busy court

    Government supports unique intellectual property fund

    IP service providers showcase products

    Experts call for standardization of IP services

    精品久久久久久无码免费| 区三区激情福利综合中文字幕在线一区亚洲视频1 | 亚洲va无码专区国产乱码| 久久中文字幕人妻丝袜| 免费无码作爱视频| 中文字幕免费不卡二区| 久久无码人妻一区二区三区| 中文字幕人妻在线视频不卡乱码| 精品久久久无码中文字幕| 未满小14洗澡无码视频网站| 中文精品久久久久人妻| 亚洲国产精品无码中文字 | 国产成人无码A区在线观看视频| 中文字幕精品无码久久久久久3D日动漫| 亚洲av无码天堂一区二区三区 | 亚洲午夜国产精品无码老牛影视| 无码中文字幕av免费放dvd| 日韩av片无码一区二区三区不卡| 无码精品A∨在线观看| 国产成人麻豆亚洲综合无码精品| 最近更新中文字幕在线| 中文字幕人妻丝袜乱一区三区| a级毛片无码兔费真人久久| 毛片无码免费无码播放| 无码人妻熟妇AV又粗又大| 国产成人无码AV一区二区在线观看| 性无码专区一色吊丝中文字幕| 波多野结衣中文字幕久久| 中文精品无码中文字幕无码专区 | 日韩亚洲欧美中文在线| 无码任你躁久久久久久| 日韩精品无码永久免费网站| 高h纯肉无码视频在线观看| 无码精品久久久久久人妻中字 | 国产成人无码18禁午夜福利p | 久久无码av三级| 国产无码一区二区在线| 天堂无码在线观看| 中文字幕久久波多野结衣av| 日韩精品久久无码人妻中文字幕| 久久久久中文字幕|