久久久无码人妻精品无码_6080YYY午夜理论片中无码_性无码专区_无码人妻品一区二区三区精99

   
 
Examining points in telecommunications for invention patent applications relating to biling systems
By Liu Shen,Yang Weiming((China IP))
Updated: 2013-09-09

The Patent Office of China has received in recent years a large number of applications for invention patent relating to telecommunications billing system due to the rapid development of the Internet and mobile communication technology. As “billing systems” are closely related to commercial activities, i.e. business methods, they have been precluded from statutorily patentable subject matters. Therefore, it is necessary that a patent examiner in the area of telecommunications remains business method aware when examining applications involving billing systems according to China’s Patent Law; on the other hand, it is also worthwhile for those engaged in this area of telecommunications to acquire more precise knowledge before filing relevant applications.

Examining points in telecommunications for invention patent applications relating to biling systems
Lin Shen

Yet, examiners have to make many subjective determinations during examination because on the one hand business methods have not been defined clearly by the Patent Law; on the other hand, erroneous examination conclusions have been reached for invention patent applications in certain areas of telecommunications involving billing systems because examiners frequently make wooden decisions and are excessively sensitive about billing system applications, for the reasons that relevant knowledge is scarce for decisional authorities to judge business method patent eligibility, resulting in individual cases of prejudicial determinations as to every “billing method.” Moreover, lack of proper knowledge on the part of an applicant might lead to tremendous loss when his application is determined to be a business method. This not only affects the quality of communication patent examination, but also hinders the development of communication technologies related to billing system.

In light of the above, this article will try, from the perspective of the decisional authorities and the characteristics of the patent applications related to billing systems in the telecommunications area, to provide some key points for the examination, in the hope of offering some insights for the telecommunications examiners and inventors.

I. Patent eligibility of business method

To determine whether a patent application for invention is a business method, it is necessary to first understand what is a business method in patent sense and the Patent Office treatment.

A business method refers to the ways to conduct all kinds of commercial activities and operations, in a broad sense, an interpretation of social and economic rules and methods, including securities, insurance, leasing, auction, advertising, services, operational management, administration, transaction arrangements etc.

By this definition, business method encompasses very wide field. Although the above illustrative examples do not specifically cite billing systems, their expansive interpretation necessarily includes billing systems given the close relationship with business.

However, not all business methods included in business categories are ineligible for patent.

In patent world, the eligibility of business methods has long been debated, from the 1908 US case of Hotel Security Checking Co. v. Lorraine Co., which established the “business method exception,” to the 1998 State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Signature Financial Group, which opened the door for business method eligibility, and then to the qualified limitations on business method in the case of InreBilski of 2006. It can be seen from these cases that US, a leading country in patent industry, has been indecisive and wavering on the patent eligibility examination of business method.

The treatment of patent eligibility of a business method has gone through two stages in China, the first being based on the “inventive contribution,” and second, being based on the 2006 and 2010 examining guidelines provisions of “the rules and methods for mental activities,” as well as Article 2 of the Patent Law (as amended in 2009) on the patentable subject matters. The current is the second.

Then, how to determine whether a patent application for invention in China is a business method at present?

Firstly, determination is made as to whether the application is the simple subject of a business method, and if yes, it is not a patentable subject matter within the meaning of Article 25.1 (2) of the Patent Law.

Secondly, if not, the examiner should proceed to determine whether the subject matter of the invention is an application of business method by employing conventional computation or network technologies, in the following three specific steps:

(1) Determining by the technical background of the written description and/or common sense that the subject matter of the invention is not a technical solution, and therefore not a patentable subject matter by simply reciting Article 2.2 of the Patent Law;

(2) Determining by the prior art search based on the technical background of the written description that the technical problem has been solved, and the subject matter, for example, a business operational mode, is a non-technical solution, and therefore, is not a patentable subject matter under Article 2.2 of the Patent Law; and

(3) Determining prior art references from the search result that may affect novelty and/or inventiveness by reciting novelty and/or inventiveness issues. In comparison with the inventive contribution theory in the first stage, the second stage focuses on the overall determination. However, due to the influence of the “inventive contribution” theory and insufficient understanding of the examining procedures, some examiners, under such influence, may still make subjective determinations when examining business methods. As a result, the same invention application may end up in different directions by different examiners, which is not conductive for the implementation of a consistency examination standard for business method applied for patent.

Examining points in telecommunications for invention patent applications relating to biling systems
Yang Weiming

II. The characteristics of patent application for invention related to communications billing system

There have been few patent applications that are pure business methods, which can be attributed to the characteristics of communications technology. Telecommunications, by definition, is to communicate information, covering in its broadest sense, anything from yelling at a space to an exchange of letters. However, modern telecommunications, in patent sense often refer to equipmentor method-based communications between people anywhere. Thus, rarely has pure business method been applied for patent in communications field, and most, if any, being related in one way or another to business method. Billing systems are precisely examples of business method related invention in the field of telecommunications.

The subject matters of telecommunications billing system generally include technical and non-technical features, the intended solution of the problems, in sum, being accounting of fees and serving the purpose of billing practices. It can be seen from these foregoing features that the examiner may, influenced by the theory of inventive contribution, easily be inclined to draw a wrong conclusion that those patentable subject matters are non-patentable business methods in the examination of telecommunications billing systems.

III. The key for the examination of patent applications for invention related to communication billing system

How to avoid the influence of inventive contribution theory and effectively implement the examination procedure of business method in the second stage to determine whether a telecommunications billing system constitutes a business method?

The most important thing is to treat the claim as a whole and place the claim in the application as a whole. The examiner should not separate charging method from the claim involving billing, otherwise it may lead to a wrong conclusion. The following is a case to illustrate the significance of the overall examination.

[Case]

Claim 1: A billing method for multimedia broadcast service being a multimedia broadcasting system including a billing center, multimedia broadcasting terminal, and billing terminal, comprising the steps of: (1) producing a first billing pulse according to said multimedia billing rate, to be transmitted through a multimedia broadcast network channel;

(2) receiving multimedia signals by said multimedia broadcasting terminal and sending said billing pulse to said billing terminal;

(3) counting said multimedia billing pulse when an end user starts to use said multimedia services corresponding to said pulse, and terminating counting when an end user stops said multimedia service corresponding to said billing pulse.

At the first impression that claim 1 is related to billing method, the examiner thinks that there may be a business method involved and then separate such method from the claim. After that, the examiner makes a patent retrieval to determine whether the technical features of such method are common sense, and finds that there has been a prior art in billing method that media gateway controller (equivalent to billing center in the claim) generates billing pulses of different frequencies and transmits such pulses to media gateway (equivalent to multimedia broadcasting terminal in the claim), which then transmits such pulse to user terminal. The examiner thinks that there is also a prior art in the field for pulses counting, and there is no technical improvement in the structure of billing apparatus even if the billing pulses can be generated according to rate in the billing process. Based on the foregoing analysis, the examiner concludes that the technical problem intended to be resolved in the claim is the way to determine the frequencies of billing pulses according to rate, and therefore, constitutes no technical issue; the method adopted in the claim is used to count the frequencies of billing pulses according to the rate and billing amount represented by each billing pulse which is all specified by human being; that such operation is based on man’s subjective will and bound by no natural laws, and therefore, constitutes no technical solution; that it aims at providing the users with a kind of billing rule instead of technical effects; and thereby, that the claim dose not satisfy the requirement of Article 2.2 of China’s Patent Law.

It can be seen from the above statement that the examiner has a preoccupation that “billing is related to business method,” and then divides the technical solution into three parts: the first is to transmit billing pulses among billing center, multimedia broadcasting terminal and billing terminal; the second is to count such pulses; and the third is to determine the frequencies of billing pulses according to rate. After such analysis, the examiner concludes that all the technical features involved in the first and second part are common sense in the field, and the third part falls outside technical categories, therefore the technical solution included in the claim is, a business method and constitutes no object for a patent.

However, is this really the case?

According to the description, the application intends to state a billing charging method for multimedia broadcast which is featured by realtime billing without interactive channel configuration. To that end, the invention applied for patent adopts a technical solution included in the claim to transmit the billing pulses corresponding to the rate of specific service from billing center and multimedia broadcasting terminal to billing terminal, which counts the pulses when the users enjoys specific service, and therefore, real-time billing can be achieved without interactive channel configuration. The examiner is right in that there is a prior art for the transmission of billing pulses among billing center, multimedia broadcasting terminal and billing terminal, but wrong in his or her failure to examine the technical solution as a whole. Therefore, the examiner fails to realize that all prior arts need interactive channel configuration to transmit billing pulses for realtime billing, whereas the broadcast service without interactive channel can not be real-timely charged because broadcast network can not monitor the consumption due to the lack of interaction between consumer’s action and such network, and therefore prepaid system was inevitably introduced. In conclusion, the examiner fails to realize that the technical solution as a whole can resolve the technical problem which can not be resolved by any prior art because of his or her separate examination of the application.

It can be seen from the above case that, when judging whether the technical solution in a claim is a business method or not, the examiner should: (a) discard the prejudice that “charging is related to business method” and, (b) not divide the claim into separate parts and determine, according to such division, whether the technical solution for the problem is a technical issue or not, adopts technical method or not, and results in technical effect or not. Where there is a solution in the claim to be examined for its being a business method or not, the examiner should not only take the claim as a whole, but also put the claim into the application and examine them as a whole, in order to make a conclusion whether such problem intended to be resolved is a technical issue or not.

IV. Summary

In retrospection to the origin of business method and making an analysis of the characteristics of telecommunications billing systems, the essay puts forward that, in such examination, the examiner should not divide the claim into several parts. Instead, he or she should put the claim into the application as a whole, and examine them as a whole too. The examiner should focus on the point whether the business method adopts technical means and results in corresponding technical effect.

The author hopes that this essay may help scientific and technical personnel, agencies and examiners related to billing technologies in communication to have a better understanding of the relation between billing and business method for a good application and examination as well.

(Translated by Yuan Renhui)



The J-Innovation

Steve Jobs died the month that the latest Nobel Prize winners were announced. The coincidence lends itself to speculation about inevitability.

Volunteer team bails out busy court

Government supports unique intellectual property fund

IP service providers showcase products

Experts call for standardization of IP services

久久久无码人妻精品无码_6080YYY午夜理论片中无码_性无码专区_无码人妻品一区二区三区精99

    欧美黄色一级片视频| 隔壁人妻偷人bd中字| 黄色小视频大全| 国产xxxxx视频| 日本福利视频在线观看| 日本特黄a级片| 精品视频在线观看一区| 亚洲18在线看污www麻豆| 九色自拍视频在线观看| 亚洲天堂网站在线| 热久久精品免费视频| 免费特级黄色片| 天天av天天操| 欧美日韩在线成人| 岛国大片在线播放| 北条麻妃亚洲一区| 激情综合网俺也去| 免费无遮挡无码永久视频| 日本一区二区免费高清视频| 99视频在线视频| 91九色在线观看视频| 路边理发店露脸熟妇泻火| 91网址在线播放| 欧美牲交a欧美牲交| 久久久久久av无码免费网站下载| 污污动漫在线观看| 无遮挡又爽又刺激的视频| 青青在线免费观看| 久久最新免费视频| 亚洲色图偷拍视频| 爱爱爱爱免费视频| 黄色免费网址大全| 久久久精品在线视频| 蜜臀av无码一区二区三区| 先锋影音男人资源| 国产高清精品软男同| 中文字幕亚洲欧洲| 自拍偷拍一区二区三区四区 | 在线观看17c| 日本成人xxx| 三级性生活视频| 免费精品99久久国产综合精品应用| 成人免费在线小视频| www.av毛片| av网站大全免费| 久久亚洲国产成人精品无码区| 看一级黄色录像| 国产高清不卡无码视频| 欧美性猛交内射兽交老熟妇| 欧美一级黄色录像片| 玖玖精品在线视频| 蜜桃视频一区二区在线观看| 欧美极品少妇无套实战| 日本黄大片在线观看| 成人性生活视频免费看| 人妻久久久一区二区三区| 农民人伦一区二区三区| 日韩av新片网| 99热自拍偷拍| 麻豆传传媒久久久爱| 超碰av在线免费观看| 五月天婷婷亚洲| 久久精品亚洲天堂| 色哟哟免费网站| 黄色一级视频在线播放| 男人揉女人奶房视频60分| 国产淫片av片久久久久久| 亚洲色欲综合一区二区三区| 激情五月亚洲色图| 欧美激情第3页| 艳母动漫在线观看| 日本男女交配视频| 无码人妻丰满熟妇区96| 麻豆传传媒久久久爱| 亚洲视频一二三四| 日本xxx免费| 毛片在线播放视频| 日韩av一二三四| 国产亚洲视频一区| 国产制服91一区二区三区制服| 国产精品入口芒果| av不卡在线免费观看| 亚洲精品国产suv一区88| 免费一级特黄特色毛片久久看| 免费激情视频在线观看| 国产精欧美一区二区三区白种人| 黄色一级视频播放| 国产a级一级片| 一女二男3p波多野结衣| 肉大捧一出免费观看网站在线播放 | 五月天中文字幕在线| 成人国产在线看| 北条麻妃在线一区| 日韩精品第1页| 久热免费在线观看| 国产成人精品免费看在线播放| av日韩一区二区三区| 91香蕉视频污版| 日韩在线视频在线| 日韩视频免费在线播放| 美国av在线播放| 欧美成人免费高清视频| a级黄色片网站| 国产a级片免费观看| 国产精品av免费观看| 国产成人av影视| 国产精品三级一区二区| the porn av| 欧美一级免费播放| 国内自拍第二页| 手机看片福利盒子久久| 毛片在线视频观看| 国产一级片自拍| 欧美亚洲一二三区| 黑人巨茎大战欧美白妇| 黄色永久免费网站| 国产精品自拍片| 中文字幕精品在线播放| 国产三级三级看三级| 亚洲熟妇无码另类久久久| 男人的天堂成人| 久热精品在线播放| 激情五月开心婷婷| 黄色三级中文字幕| 99视频在线观看视频| 日本888xxxx| 69堂免费视频| 日本免费a视频| 亚洲小视频在线播放| 黄色一级片免费的| 午夜视频在线瓜伦| 香港三级韩国三级日本三级| 大地资源网在线观看免费官网| 亚洲国产日韩欧美在线观看| 红桃av在线播放| 自拍日韩亚洲一区在线| 五月天激情图片| 中文字幕免费高| 中文字幕永久有效| 日韩爱爱小视频| 久久精品网站视频| 欧美 激情 在线| 人妻精品无码一区二区三区| www.夜夜爱| 成人小视频在线观看免费| 三级网在线观看| 在线观看免费视频污| 成人av毛片在线观看| 在线能看的av网站| 色悠悠久久综合网| 午夜久久久精品| 天天干天天干天天干天天干天天干| 少妇高潮喷水久久久久久久久久| 亚洲熟妇无码一区二区三区| www.av毛片| 国产深夜男女无套内射| 欧美深夜福利视频| 精品国产一区三区| 亚欧无线一线二线三线区别| 欧美三级在线观看视频| 日韩国产一级片| 天天夜碰日日摸日日澡性色av| 福利视频免费在线观看| 东北少妇不带套对白| 国产日韩av网站| 国产人妻777人伦精品hd| 国产白丝袜美女久久久久| 国产免费观看高清视频| 99爱视频在线| 亚洲一区二区三区四区五区xx| 毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片 | 免费看的黄色大片| 日韩黄色片视频| 午夜欧美福利视频| 亚洲美女性囗交| 国产又大又长又粗又黄| av在线免费观看国产| 欧美爱爱视频免费看| 国产成人无码av在线播放dvd| av免费网站观看| 三级性生活视频| 91传媒免费视频| koreanbj精品视频一区| 国产精品入口免费软件| 中文字幕视频三区| 日本一道在线观看| a√天堂在线观看| 色片在线免费观看| 国产一二三四区在线观看| 日本丰满少妇xxxx| av网站在线不卡| 日韩人妻一区二区三区蜜桃视频| 久操网在线观看| 91最新在线观看| 四虎免费在线观看视频| www黄色日本| 亚欧激情乱码久久久久久久久| 熟妇熟女乱妇乱女网站| 日本欧美视频在线观看| 亚洲国产精品三区|