中文
     
    Home> Local
    Controversy surrounds publicizing offenders' personal info
    By Guo Rui ( China Daily )
    Updated: 2010-07-19

    Public notices revealing names in prostitution case stir debate

    WUHAN - A public notice disclosing the personal information of people involved in a prostitution case in Hubei's provincial capital has aroused national controversy over privacy issues.

    The Hongshan police sub-bureau pasted a special public notice about a June 26 raid of a local massage parlor along the streets in the Chenjiawan community on July 7.

    The notice said the sex worker and patron were both sentenced to one year of detention education. The establishment's owner had been put in administrative detention for 15 days before being transferred to a criminal detention facility on July 6 on charges of "sheltering prostitution". The parlor's hostess, who fled the scene, has been put on a law enforcement wanted list.

    The notice revealed the offenders' personal information, including their names and ages.

    Many community residents, who had long been concerned about the their neighborhood's increasingly negative reputation, applauded the move.

    "Shame on the prostitution!" Changjiang Commercial Daily quoted a local resident surnamed Liu as saying.

    "Their names should be publicized, and people should loathe and despise them."

    However, most believe publicizing the offenders' real names is a violation of their privacy.

    The news story became one of the most commented upon online. A survey on sina.com, the country's largest news portal, found 60.3 percent of the 101,758 netizens polled by 6 pm on Sunday believed that publicly revealing offenders' real names is a violation of privacy.

    Only 36.2 percent of those surveyed supported the move, saying it will help deter illegal activities, such as prostitution.

    Changjiang Commercial Daily quoted a lawyer surnamed Gu as saying the police acted in accordance with law.

    "Because the offense was proven, there was no invasion of privacy," Gu said.

    But another lawyer, Zhang Wanying, believed the move was inappropriate.

    "Even criminals have the right to privacy," Zhang said.

    Henan Provincial Party School professor Zhang Tingyin told China Daily the issue should be viewed from two perspectives - that of the individual and that of society.

    "On the level of the individual, the offenders' privacy has been violated and it may have negative impacts on their future lives," he explained.

    "On the level of society, labeling them as criminals involved in prostitution subjects them to social discrimination."

    In a similar case, the publication of two sex workers' and two patrons' photographs by media in Dongguan, Guangdong province, aroused online controversy over the weekend.

    A radio and television station in Dongguan's Qingxi township included three photographs of offenders in a report on a July 5 raid. When the photographs were posted online, a thread at Mop.com questioning their release sparked heated controversy, with most Web users opposed to publicizing the photos.

    China Daily

    (China Daily 07/19/2010 page4)

     
    Video
    Specials



     
     
    无码精品国产一区二区三区免费| 久久99中文字幕久久| 无码人妻少妇久久中文字幕蜜桃| 亚洲中文字幕无码日韩| 欧美精品中文字幕亚洲专区| 熟妇人妻无码中文字幕| 亚洲中文字幕伊人久久无码| 亚洲av无码国产精品色在线看不卡| 亚洲av永久无码精品国产精品| 中文www新版资源在线| 精品久久亚洲中文无码| 99久久人妻无码精品系列| 亚洲AV中文无码字幕色三| 久久精品亚洲乱码伦伦中文| 亚洲中文字幕日本无线码| 成在人线AV无码免观看麻豆| 无码人妻久久一区二区三区免费丨| 亚洲欧美日韩另类中文字幕组| 亚洲精品无码永久中文字幕 | 一级片无码中文字幕乱伦 | 精品久久久久中文字幕日本| 日韩精品无码免费视频| 好硬~好爽~别进去~动态图, 69式真人无码视频免 | 亚洲中文字幕第一页在线| 亚洲av麻豆aⅴ无码电影| 久久精品无码专区免费| av大片在线无码免费| 国产成人无码精品一区在线观看| 国产精品无码日韩欧| 国产v亚洲v天堂无码网站| 本道天堂成在人线av无码免费| 无码精品A∨在线观看| 少妇人妻无码精品视频app| 亚洲av无码国产精品色午夜字幕 | 乱人伦中文无码视频在线观看| 制服中文字幕一区二区| 中文自拍日本综合| 久久精品亚洲AV久久久无码| 中文字幕有码无码AV| 亚洲av无码一区二区三区不卡| 亚洲AV无码成人精品区蜜桃|