中文
     
    Home> Local
    Controversy surrounds publicizing offenders' personal info
    By Guo Rui ( China Daily )
    Updated: 2010-07-19

    Public notices revealing names in prostitution case stir debate

    WUHAN - A public notice disclosing the personal information of people involved in a prostitution case in Hubei's provincial capital has aroused national controversy over privacy issues.

    The Hongshan police sub-bureau pasted a special public notice about a June 26 raid of a local massage parlor along the streets in the Chenjiawan community on July 7.

    The notice said the sex worker and patron were both sentenced to one year of detention education. The establishment's owner had been put in administrative detention for 15 days before being transferred to a criminal detention facility on July 6 on charges of "sheltering prostitution". The parlor's hostess, who fled the scene, has been put on a law enforcement wanted list.

    The notice revealed the offenders' personal information, including their names and ages.

    Many community residents, who had long been concerned about the their neighborhood's increasingly negative reputation, applauded the move.

    "Shame on the prostitution!" Changjiang Commercial Daily quoted a local resident surnamed Liu as saying.

    "Their names should be publicized, and people should loathe and despise them."

    However, most believe publicizing the offenders' real names is a violation of their privacy.

    The news story became one of the most commented upon online. A survey on sina.com, the country's largest news portal, found 60.3 percent of the 101,758 netizens polled by 6 pm on Sunday believed that publicly revealing offenders' real names is a violation of privacy.

    Only 36.2 percent of those surveyed supported the move, saying it will help deter illegal activities, such as prostitution.

    Changjiang Commercial Daily quoted a lawyer surnamed Gu as saying the police acted in accordance with law.

    "Because the offense was proven, there was no invasion of privacy," Gu said.

    But another lawyer, Zhang Wanying, believed the move was inappropriate.

    "Even criminals have the right to privacy," Zhang said.

    Henan Provincial Party School professor Zhang Tingyin told China Daily the issue should be viewed from two perspectives - that of the individual and that of society.

    "On the level of the individual, the offenders' privacy has been violated and it may have negative impacts on their future lives," he explained.

    "On the level of society, labeling them as criminals involved in prostitution subjects them to social discrimination."

    In a similar case, the publication of two sex workers' and two patrons' photographs by media in Dongguan, Guangdong province, aroused online controversy over the weekend.

    A radio and television station in Dongguan's Qingxi township included three photographs of offenders in a report on a July 5 raid. When the photographs were posted online, a thread at Mop.com questioning their release sparked heated controversy, with most Web users opposed to publicizing the photos.

    China Daily

    (China Daily 07/19/2010 page4)

     
    Video
    Specials



     
     
    无码专区永久免费AV网站| 久久久91人妻无码精品蜜桃HD| 精品无码国产一区二区三区AV| 中文字幕无码高清晰| 中文一国产一无码一日韩| 国产精品99无码一区二区 | 国产精品无码a∨精品| 最近免费字幕中文大全视频| 国产成人精品无码一区二区| 中文国产成人精品久久亚洲精品AⅤ无码精品 | 亚洲Av综合色区无码专区桃色| 色婷婷综合久久久久中文 | 精品久久久久久无码中文字幕| 中文字幕视频在线免费观看| 99久久无码一区人妻a黑| 中文字幕无码无码专区| av区无码字幕中文色| 国产亚洲精品无码专区| 无码精品人妻一区二区三区免费看| 日韩欧美中文亚洲高清在线| 日韩精品无码一区二区三区| 人妻无码αv中文字幕久久琪琪布| 狠狠躁夜夜躁无码中文字幕 | 中国少妇无码专区| 精品无码人妻一区二区三区品| 开心久久婷婷综合中文字幕| 色婷婷综合久久久中文字幕| 亚洲一级特黄无码片| 人妻无码一区二区三区AV| 69堂人成无码免费视频果冻传媒 | 亚洲色成人中文字幕网站| 911国产免费无码专区| 人妻丰满熟妇av无码区不卡| 亚洲VA中文字幕无码一二三区 | 久久受www免费人成_看片中文| 办公室丝袜激情无码播放| 亚洲AV无码国产精品色午友在线| 少妇无码太爽了不卡在线观看 | 亚洲色无码专区在线观看| 中文字幕一区二区免费| 亚洲欧洲中文日韩久久AV乱码|