Peking University recently rejected the demand of some students, who had performed excellently in the national college entrance exam, for scholarships as bonus for getting admitted to the university to raise its profile. By using their high scores as a bargaining chip for getting scholarship, these students have become victims of their own doing, says an article on gmw.cn. Excerpts:

Peking University was justified in rejecting the demand of the top students. After all, they have excelled in only one of the many important exams in their life and do not need to be rewarded before proving themselves capable in the others.

But these toppers alone are not to blame for the prevailing state of affairs in the echelons of higher education. To a certain degree, prestigious universities that compete with each other to attract students who have scored high marks in the national college entrance exam are also to blame for the situation. Apart from being offered alluring bonuses by such universities eager to enhance their reputation, high-quality students are also given huge cash awards by local governments to add to their political achievements.

There is nothing wrong in universities offering incentives to attract top students, but the incentives should be highly qualified teachers and best quality education. There is also nothing wrong in society lauding the achievements of top students, but people should be able to differentiate between right and wrong and not give undue importance to their scores in the national college entrance exam.

The fact that Peking University rejected the money-oriented demand of the top students, however, shows that some universities have realized what education should be all about. Their realization also tells us that it is high time universities focused on offering high-quality and practical education.

But it remains to be seen whether Peking University's action will serve as a wake-up call for other universities and society as a whole.