US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
    Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

    Right to belief needs State protection

    By Li Xiangping (China Daily) Updated: 2014-06-26 07:49

    Officials at Nanchang, Jiangxi province, didn't expect to catch the attention of the entire nation when they rolled out an ambitious urban development plan of demolishing three Buddhist temples and building a composite one - called "Nanhai Palace" - to "replace" them.

    The official website of the government of Xihu district, where the three old temples stand and the new one has been planned, says the development plan is aimed at facilitating religious and cultural activities in the district, and building a facility that would attract tourists in droves. "The temple will occupy a commanding height in Buddhism followers' hearts", the website says.

    The effect, however, has been just the opposite. Instead of winning popular support, the plan has elicited only opposition from Buddhists and the residents where the new temple has been planned. The residents oppose the plan because the site of the new temple was originally designated as public green space, not as a place for religious or other activities. Buddhists are against the plan because it will force monks and nuns to live in the same temple complex, which is against Buddhism doctrine and practice.

    Finding itself in an awkward position because of the nationwide criticism, the local government has announced that it might choose another site for the temple. But, at the same time, it has emphasized any change in land use has undergone "legal procedures" and it is "determined to implement the plan".

    The local government has indeed the authority to make its actions "legal". Journalists, however, have dug out records to show that years ago the local government had indeed promised to build a public green space on the site of the new temple, prompting many people to purchase houses there. By using the disguise of paperwork to break its promise, the local government is distancing itself from residents.

    More investigations by the media have revealed that the local officials didn't hold any consultation with either Buddhism followers or local residents. This means the aggrieved parties were not even given a chance to voice their opinions. All that the local government did was to hold some closed-door meetings and then issue a notice saying the three temples would be demolished and a new one be built in their place.

    By violating democratic procedures and residents' rights, the local government has posed a direct challenge to the concept of "people-oriented urbanization" advocated by Premier Li Keqiang.

    Besides, Buddhist tenets clearly state that male and female followers cannot live in the same temple. The local government's adamant attitude even in the face of nationwide criticism and the risk of violating Buddhists' beliefs shows how arrogant power can become against powerless individuals.

    The local officials' claims that the new temple would occupy "a commanding height" in the hearts of Buddhists. But in reality, the temple would become a symbol of "sacrilege". The Constitution clearly states that Chinese citizens shall enjoy religious freedom, which includes choosing their own faith and belief. If local governments start violating religious beliefs, believers will feel marginalized and insecure.

    In one sense, the debate on the plan in Nanchang is also a tussle between power and public opinion. The local government's determination, despite public opposition, reflects that it might go ahead with the plan. But if does so, it will lose public trust and create other long-term problems for itself.

    Since disputes over demolition of structures have become common during China's urbanization drive, local governments should be extremely careful about razing temples, churches or mosques because they are directly related with the freedom of religion. Religious places that have suffered in recent times include Ruiyun temple in Fuzhou, Fujian province, and Xingjiao temple in Xi'an, Shaanxi province.

    So we hope that higher authorities will intervene to stop the folly from being repeated in Nanchang.

    The author is a professor at and director of the Center of Religion and Society, affiliated to East China Normal University.

    Most Viewed Today's Top News
    ...
    人禽无码视频在线观看| 中文字幕av无码一区二区三区电影| 亚洲男人第一无码aⅴ网站| 在线中文字幕精品第5页| 国产激情无码一区二区三区| 无码人妻精品一区二区三区蜜桃 | 中文字幕人妻无码一夲道 | 无码专区6080yy国产电影| 国产激情无码一区二区三区 | 亚洲精品无码专区2| 亚洲va无码手机在线电影| 一本加勒比HEZYO无码人妻| 亚洲精品无码av天堂| 无码内射中文字幕岛国片| 7国产欧美日韩综合天堂中文久久久久 | 亚洲AV无码1区2区久久| 永久免费无码网站在线观看个| 最近中文字幕高清中文字幕无| 久久久噜噜噜久久中文字幕色伊伊| 亚洲ⅴ国产v天堂a无码二区| 久久精品aⅴ无码中文字字幕不卡| 亚洲人成无码网站在线观看| 最近2019年中文字幕一页| 涩涩色中文综合亚洲| 中文字幕不卡高清视频在线| 五十路熟妇高熟无码视频| 99精品一区二区三区无码吞精| 亚洲一区二区三区无码中文字幕| 中文字幕色婷婷在线视频| 亚洲gv天堂无码男同在线观看 | 日韩免费无码一区二区三区| 亚洲中文字幕无码永久在线 | 亚洲国产精品无码久久久秋霞2| 久久久无码精品亚洲日韩蜜臀浪潮| 亚洲精品高清无码视频| 中文字幕乱码免费看电影| 亚洲成A人片在线观看无码不卡| 中文字幕无码日韩专区| 精品久久久久久无码国产| 免费无码AV一区二区| 一区二区三区观看免费中文视频在线播放|