US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
    Opinion / Editorials

    Accountability for information

    (China Daily) Updated: 2014-10-21 08:05

    If government transparency is a yardstick for gauging the quality of governance, very few local governments, or even many central government departments, measure up to even the lowest standard required when it comes to the disclosure of information to the public.

    A report on government transparency released by the Chinese Academy of Sciences shows that only 10 percent of the 55 central government departments meet the lowest requirement; and of the 31 governments in provinces, municipalities and autonomous regions, only seven do.

    In a typical case, a staff member of a non-governmental organization filed 320 applications for information from 31 governments at the provincial level. She merely wanted to know the number of prostitutes, whoremongers and drug addicts who had been placed in mandatory correction. But she either got no response at all or was told that such information could not be disclosed to the public.

    After the violent conflict last week between local villagers and developers in Jinning county, Yunnan province, villagers told reporters that they had never been shown any formal documents about the requisition of their land for construction purposes. That lack of information helped trigger hostilities that ended with eight people dead and 18 others injured.

    The county government turned down reporters' requests to see the documents.

    Information of the type mentioned in these cases is definitely not confidential. So why are governments unwilling to share such material with the public?

    Information about crime and punishment helps people to understand problems in society and to monitor the government's response to those problems. Villagers whose homes are about to be taken have more than enough reason to be shown a land requisition certificate and other related documents.

    Under regulations adopted by the State Council, if there is no valid reason for a government entity to withhold information, it should be given to anyone who applies for it.

    Only by letting people know what it's doing can a government reasonably be subject to the supervision of the public. Public oversight is nothing but empty talk without transparency.

    Of course, anyone who cannot get information can sue to get it, and in fact the NGO member seeking the prostitution and drug data has filed an administrative lawsuit.

    Governments should not arbitrarily block information. They need to develop an awareness of the importance of disclosure and should provide applicants with the information they request unless it is prohibited by law.

    This is fundamental to the rule of law, which is the central theme of the ongoing Fourth Plenum of the 18th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China.

    Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

    Most Viewed Today's Top News
    ...
    亚洲国产AV无码专区亚洲AV| 最新中文字幕AV无码不卡| 色吊丝中文字幕| 人禽无码视频在线观看 | 亚洲AV无码码潮喷在线观看| 少妇人妻综合久久中文字幕| 色综合久久久久无码专区| 少妇中文无码高清| 中文文字幕文字幕亚洲色| 精品人妻系列无码天堂| 成人无码AV一区二区| а天堂中文在线官网| 亚洲AV无码一区二区三区国产| 无码中文字幕乱在线观看| 日韩成人无码中文字幕| 国产日韩精品中文字无码| 亚洲人成国产精品无码| 国产精品无码专区| 日韩精品无码一区二区中文字幕| 中文无码成人免费视频在线观看| 最近新中文字幕大全高清| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕| 熟妇人妻中文av无码| 四虎成人精品国产永久免费无码| 精品无码国产一区二区三区51安 | 日韩精品无码免费专区网站| 日本欧美亚洲中文| 精品久久久久中文字| 日韩中文字幕在线| 亚洲欧美日韩在线中文字幕 | 青娱乐在线国产中文字幕免費資訊| 亚洲中文字幕无码永久在线| 忘忧草在线社区WWW中国中文| 人妻少妇精品无码专区动漫| 黑人无码精品又粗又大又长 | 中文字幕在线播放| 高清无码中文字幕在线观看视频| 精品中文高清欧美| 最近免费字幕中文大全| 国产成人无码区免费内射一片色欲 | 无码专区—VA亚洲V天堂|