US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
    Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

    Beggar-thy-neighbor taxation policy hurts all

    By Wolfgang Schauble (China Daily) Updated: 2014-11-05 07:54

    Thanks to technical advances in the digital economy, companies can serve markets without having to be physically present in them. At the same time, sources of income have become more mobile: There is an increasing focus on intangible assets and mobile investment income that can easily be "optimized" from a tax point of view and transferred abroad.

    Tax legislation has not kept pace with these developments. Most of the tax-allocation principles that apply today date back to a time when doing business internationally primarily meant transporting goods across a border to a neighboring country. But rules that were devised for this in the 1920s and 1930s are no longer suitable for today's international integration of economic processes and corporate structures. They need to be adapted to the economic reality of digital services.

    In the absence of workable rules, states are losing revenue that they urgently need in order to fulfill their responsibilities. At the same time, the issue of fair taxation is becoming more and more pressing, because the number of taxpayers who make an adequate contribution to financing public goods and services is decreasing.

    The resulting tensions between national fiscal sovereignty and the borderless scope of today's business activities can be resolved only through international dialogue and uniform global standards. Within the European Union, permitting groups of states to forge ahead with joint solutions to issues that can be addressed only multilaterally has worked well in the past. If such measures prove successful, other states would follow.

    This approach can also serve as a global governance model for resolving international problems. In today's world, even large states cannot establish and enforce international frameworks on their own. Groups of countries still can. This has been demonstrated in the context of financial market regulation; it is starting to become clear with regard to the regulatory framework for the digital economy, and it is now being confirmed in the area of taxation.

    Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

    Most Viewed Today's Top News
    ...
    亚洲中文字幕丝袜制服一区| 天堂AV无码AV一区二区三区| 亚洲精品无码专区久久同性男| 玖玖资源站中文字幕在线| 久久久久成人精品无码| 亚洲精品中文字幕无码蜜桃| 国产乱码精品一区二区三区中文 | 99re热这里只有精品视频中文字幕 | 亚洲AV无码一区二区乱子伦| 六月婷婷中文字幕| 无码精品人妻一区二区三区免费| 中文无码伦av中文字幕| 亚洲日本va午夜中文字幕一区| 97无码免费人妻超| 色AV永久无码影院AV| 精品亚洲成在人线AV无码| 无码精品A∨在线观看中文| 播放亚洲男人永久无码天堂 | 日韩人妻无码精品无码中文字幕| 亚洲AV无码乱码国产麻豆穿越| 亚洲伊人久久综合中文成人网 | 久久久久无码中| 精品人无码一区二区三区| 最新高清无码专区| 中文精品人人永久免费| 欧美日韩中文字幕| 中文字幕有码无码AV| 无码人妻丰满熟妇区五十路| 久久久久久人妻无码| 少妇人妻偷人精品无码视频新浪 | 亚洲人成网亚洲欧洲无码久久| 中文字幕性| 玖玖资源站中文字幕在线| 久久精品?ⅴ无码中文字幕 | 激情欧美一区二区三区中文字幕| 中文字幕无码毛片免费看| 无码日韩精品一区二区人妻| 亚洲精品无码专区2| 色综合中文综合网| 中文字幕亚洲精品| 久久精品一区二区三区中文字幕|