US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
    Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

    Population policy change needs more moves

    By Stuart Basten (China Daily) Updated: 2015-01-14 08:33

    In 2012, the State Council-funded China Development Research Foundation advocated a three-step reform process: an immediate geographically selective two-child policy, a national two-child policy by 2015, and the removal of all constraints by 2020. At the moment, the reform timetable still seems achievable. But will such changes have much effect?

    Evidence seems to suggest that the family planning policy alone is no longer responsible for the dropping fertility rate; other social and economic factors are playing a major role. For a start, we need to see children as social goods and not just as future producers and consumers. In this way, we can try to develop a society which is more broadly supportive of parents and children both. This will require thinking about not just family policies as such, but much broadly about, for example, funding for education, planning and housing policy, the burden of care for older people placed upon couples and so on.

    A final thought is that we need to move the conversation on from a fear of a "demographic time bomb" of low fertility, declining population and so-called rapid aging. China's population - both younger and older people - is healthier and better educated than ever. The Chinese economy is more efficient and technologically advanced than ever. And urbanization and the technological revolution have made China an ever more connected and integrated economy.

    In this context, the raw numbers of people are arguably less important than the sum of their skills, their health, their education, their work and their families. Instead of being frightened about demographic change, we just need to set about making a better society for all through comprehensive, integrated social reform. Having said that, better support for the (rural) elderly people and ensuring inclusive economic development and innovation must be seen as immediate priorities.

    The author is an associate professor in Social Policy, Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford.

    Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

    Most Viewed Today's Top News
    ...
    日韩中文字幕在线视频| 亚洲欧美日韩另类中文字幕组 | 亚洲欧洲无码AV电影在线观看| 国产成A人亚洲精V品无码性色| 台湾佬中文娱乐中文| AAA级久久久精品无码区| 最好看的电影2019中文字幕 | 中文字幕VA一区二区三区| 精品无码一区二区三区亚洲桃色| 中文字幕视频免费| 久久亚洲AV无码西西人体| 无码精品久久久天天影视| 中文字幕在线免费看线人| 中中文字幕亚洲无线码| 99久久人妻无码精品系列| 亚洲国产精品无码久久久蜜芽| 最近中文字幕免费完整| 无码人妻精品中文字幕免费东京热 | 人妻无码αv中文字幕久久琪琪布| 五月天中文字幕mv在线女婷婷五月| 亚洲成a人在线看天堂无码| 成年免费a级毛片免费看无码| 亚洲AV人无码激艳猛片| 中文字幕无码免费久久| 天堂网www中文天堂在线| 久久久99精品成人片中文字幕| 色婷婷综合久久久久中文| 亚洲一区无码中文字幕| 婷婷五月六月激情综合色中文字幕 | 一本加勒比HEZYO无码资源网| 中文字幕一区视频| 精品久久久久久中文字幕| 色噜噜狠狠成人中文综合| 精品久久久无码人妻中文字幕豆芽 | 久久久久久久亚洲Av无码| 无码av免费一区二区三区| 无码人妻精品一区二区在线视频| 亚洲精品无码mv在线观看网站| 亚洲AV中文无码乱人伦在线观看 | 久久AV无码精品人妻糸列| 国产aⅴ激情无码久久|