US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
    Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

    Legal perspective of Great Wall death

    By Xie Caifeng (China Daily) Updated: 2015-04-13 07:47

    Legal perspective of Great Wall death

    A section of the Great Wall at Badaling in the suburbs of Beijing was one of the most crowded scenic spots in China during the National Day holiday. [Photo/China Daily]

    Last week, a 70-year-old Chinese woman from Heilongjiang province died on the Great Wall after she was knocked down by a tourist from Canada, who reportedly was running quickly down some steps.

    Does this constitute a crime? The answer varies. The district police governing the place where the incident happened concluded it was a pure "accident" after their investigation. Therefore, the police did not launch a criminal investigation but guided the woman's family and the Canadian woman into civil mediation.

    However, many Chinese netizens suspect the police providing favorable treatment to the tourist because of her nationality. Frankly, it is a common mindset among some Chinese because the government offered favorable treatment to foreign enterprises and citizens during the early years of opening-up.

    And several legal experts have argued that running down the steps constitutes negligent homicide according to Chinese criminal law, as it is an action that puts others at risk.

    The crime of negligent homicide in China consists of four aspects, namely an action results in death, the act itself, the causal relationship between the action and the death, the action was committed because of gross negligence. The last element usually is the most decisive one. It assumes a person has a duty not to engage in an action that may foreseeable be of danger to others.

    It is hard to give a firm conclusion based on the reported facts and details. But the reasonable assumption is that a running person may bump into others and hurt them, but not kill them.

    There are two common ways to settle a civil dispute, amicable mediation or court judgment. In either case, the Canadian woman should provide monetary compensation to the injured party either in the spirit of equitable liability principle or fault liability principle according to Chinese law. The total sum is usually hundreds of thousands of yuan subject to the merits of each case. If two parties cannot reach a consensus on compensation, the injured party may file a case with a court.

    Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

    Most Viewed Today's Top News
    ...
    中文字幕在线看视频一区二区三区| 日韩人妻无码精品久久久不卡| 亚洲VA中文字幕无码一二三区| 中文字幕亚洲精品无码| 亚洲av无码精品网站| 国产中文欧美日韩在线| 久久亚洲精品无码播放| 亚洲日产无码中文字幕| 中文字幕精品一区二区日本| 无码人妻精品一区二| 日韩精品无码一本二本三本| 无码精品A∨在线观看十八禁| 中文在线资源天堂WWW| 人妻少妇精品无码专区动漫 | 中文无码人妻有码人妻中文字幕| 亚洲Av永久无码精品三区在线| 日本久久中文字幕| 亚洲中文字幕久久精品无码APP| 国产∨亚洲V天堂无码久久久| 亚洲国产精品无码久久一线| 狠狠精品久久久无码中文字幕 | 亚洲午夜无码片在线观看影院猛| 四虎成人精品无码| 亚洲精品午夜无码专区| 国产啪亚洲国产精品无码| 乱人伦中文视频高清视频| 一区二区三区观看免费中文视频在线播放 | 无码久久精品国产亚洲Av影片| 中文字幕51日韩视频| 中文字幕在线免费观看| 中文字幕精品一区影音先锋| 亚洲欧美日韩一区高清中文字幕 | 色综合久久中文色婷婷| 天堂中文在线最新版| а√天堂中文官网8| 亚洲中文字幕在线观看| 日韩中文字幕欧美另类视频| 久久伊人中文无码| 东京热人妻无码一区二区av| 亚洲国产精品无码久久久不卡| 亚洲av无码片在线播放|