US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
    Opinion / Blog

    The best solution for honest capitalism

    By KIyer (blog.chinadaily.com.cn) Updated: 2015-05-07 15:08

    At the outset I must stress that I believe a combination of socialist and capitalist policies is best for society to thrive and prosper. 

    In the capitalist area of society, I want to outline my idea of an ideal and fair tax system. 

    Firstly, I would like to address the capitalist portion as it relates to the socialist portion. 

    One necessity for addressing some of the socialist portions of a good society would be for the State to provide facilities and resources to all citizens, with variations depending upon individual needs, but by and large, spread over a population; it is possible to calculate average costs per individual, plan and budget for these. The social responsibility for individuals would cover areas such as security (policing), infrastructure (roads, water, electricity and these days Internet), defense and health (medical facilities).

    As one would expect, profit from capitalist ventures is taxed and funds a portion of socialist policies. But it does not need to be entirely so. There can be common owned assets that function in a capitalist manner to provide employment and benefits.

    Now I want you to consider the following questions. I am asking them to provoke thought and for us to question the meanings of terms normally associate with them. I find that things are not straightforward as we like to think they are.

    1) Would we agree that the socialist portion tries to address the varying and common needs of people not able to fend for themselves in society, those that are not productive citizens - such as children, the disabled, sick and elderly? 

    2) Would you agree that the responsibility to support and pay for them should be equal upon the rest of the population?

    3) When it comes to social services such as policing, water, roads, defense etc that society provides, do you agree we all should get the same irrespective of income?

    I mean, you don't surely agree to a person paying more taxes getting better police protection, more access to public roads, more public facilities than others, do you? When we see some “rich people” or “celebrities” or people with influence being showered with government funded resources, it makes us mad. Why? Did any or many of them pay a lot more in taxes? Would it not be fair then, if they got back more?

    4) Do you also agree that people that work harder or contribute more are more enterprising, should rightly keep their earned wealth? 

    Then why do we tax the wealthy more? Even if it is a percentage of their earnings of profit, governments use the specious logic - they made that much under the system and that their fair share of tax should be higher! No, people should make their wealth through their own efforts government should only provide a level playing field and same laws for everyone. Ideally, everyone would pay equal taxes - an equal, fixed amount, not even a fixed rate or percentage of their earnings. Why is a harder working, honest richer person more liable to pay for others? Yes, that is the law now, but let us mentally question why that is fair? If it is not, let us acknowledge at least, even if we cannot change it.

    Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

    Most Viewed Today's Top News
    ...
    最新中文字幕av无码专区| 波多野结衣在线中文| 无码av免费毛片一区二区| 无码国内精品人妻少妇蜜桃视频| 精品无码国产污污污免费网站 | 久久无码人妻一区二区三区| 久久国产精品无码网站| 无码人妻丰满熟妇啪啪网站| 综合无码一区二区三区| 亚洲AV日韩AV永久无码久久| 中文字幕VA一区二区三区| 国产50部艳色禁片无码| 亚洲欧洲自拍拍偷午夜色无码| 日韩中文字幕一区| 亚洲精品无码久久不卡| 亚洲AV区无码字幕中文色| 亚欧成人中文字幕一区| 亚洲无码黄色网址| 97免费人妻无码视频| 无码人妻久久一区二区三区免费 | 无套内射在线无码播放| 亚洲七七久久精品中文国产| 中文字幕 qvod| 日韩乱码人妻无码中文视频| 日韩久久久久中文字幕人妻| 亚洲av无码av制服另类专区| 中文无码一区二区不卡αv| 中文字幕在线最新在线不卡| 色综合久久精品中文字幕首页| 中文字幕av高清片| 中文字幕乱码人在线视频1区| 亚洲AV无码之日韩精品| 日韩视频无码日韩视频又2021| 成在线人免费无码高潮喷水| 精品久久久久久久无码| 久久精品无码专区免费东京热| 精品一区二区三区无码免费视频| 无码H肉动漫在线观看| 无码137片内射在线影院| 日韩一区二区三区无码影院| 久久久久亚洲AV无码麻豆|