USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
    Opinion
    Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

    Presidential poll a test for US democracy

    By Zhao Mei | China Daily | Updated: 2016-11-07 08:08

    Presidential poll a test for US democracy

    SONG CHEN

    The United States will go to the polls to elect a new president on Tuesday. But whether Democrat Hillary Clinton or Republican Donald Trump wins the election, one thing is certain-that the presidential election campaign has widened the rift in American society.

    Public discontent has become more obvious, and some commentators believe the election is not about the Democratic Party versus the Republican Party, but about the grassroots versus the elite. Trump and Bernie Sanders (who lost the Democratic race to Clinton) were in the headlines because Sanders belongs to the left and Trump to the right. Neither represents the mainstream American society, though.

    Saunders advocated reforming the Wall Street-controlled financial system, raising the minimum wage, raising taxes for the rich, making college education free, promoting universal healthcare and opposing the consortium's use of money power to intervene in elections. And he was supported by young American voters.

    On the other hand, Trump's supporters are mostly white blue-collar workers who are not protected under affirmative action. Since the global financial crisis the social status of such workers has deteriorated, and studies show the decline of white Americans has accelerated over the past 15 years.

    Money politics is another issue in this election. After the Watergate scandal, the US imposed a number of restrictions on political contributions to limit the spread of black money, fixing the ceiling at $123,200.

    But on April 2, 2014, the US Supreme Court ruled there would be no ceiling on political campaign contributions. After the limit was removed, American democracy tilted toward money power.

    So even if any US citizen can run for presidency in principle, only the rich or the politicians supported by large monetary contributions can be nominated.

    Another issue exposed by this election campaign is the resurgence of racial conflict. Barack Obama is the first black president of the US, but during his term racial conflicts have actually increased, with police being accused of inflicting violence on blacks. Besides, the poverty rate among blacks is now almost double that among whites, according to research by Brookings Institution. So it would not be an exaggeration to say the US is experiencing the most serious racial crisis since the civil rights movement of the 1960s.

    Immigration and its impact on mainstream American culture is another major issue thrown up by this election campaign. Trump has been tough on the immigration issue, and his racist rhetoric has violated the bottom line of religious tolerance and cultural diversity of the US. But some Americans are indeed worried about the influx of illegal immigrants into the US and the social problems they could create.

    Manipulations in elections are contrary to the spirit of democracy, but this election has exposed some political conspiracies. For one, the tens of thousands of emails from the Democratic National Committee released by WikiLeaks during the primaries exposed top Democrats' efforts to "sideline" Sanders and manipulate the election.

    Moreover, "Oath Keepers", a militia group of heavily armed white men, has asked its members to patrol outside polling stations on election day to prevent voter fraud, The Washington Post said on Oct 28, 2016. The Oath Keepers comprises mostly retired police officers, veterans and retired military personnel. And although they claim to be non-partisan, they are mostly Trump supporters. This is shocking in a mature democracy.

    Worse, Trump's supporters have warned that "if Trump is defeated, it will lead to a revolution". This has prompted elites to analyze the US democratic system and researchers to discuss the rise and fall of the US.

    The real message of this election, therefore, is that American democracy has finally begun to respond to the widening wealth gap.

    The old topic of "class" has returned to the center of American politics, so the new US president has to face the reality of repairing the problem of democracy in the country.

    The author is a senior fellow at the Institute of American Studies, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, and the managing editor of the Chinese Journal of American Studies.

    Most Viewed in 24 Hours
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    无码日韩精品一区二区人妻| 狠狠躁夜夜躁无码中文字幕 | 亚洲综合无码精品一区二区三区| heyzo高无码国产精品| 最新版天堂中文在线| 成 人无码在线视频高清不卡| 成人麻豆日韩在无码视频| 中文字幕在线无码一区| 少妇无码AV无码专区线| 中文字幕久久精品| 亚洲VA中文字幕无码一二三区| 国产办公室秘书无码精品99| 自拍中文精品无码| 成人精品一区二区三区中文字幕| 国产爆乳无码视频在线观看| 无码人妻一区二区三区免费看| 国产中文在线亚洲精品官网| 中文字幕乱码人妻一区二区三区 | 国产日韩AV免费无码一区二区| 中文字幕人妻无码一夲道| 国产成人无码A区在线观看视频 | 中文字幕一区二区三区久久网站| 小泽玛丽无码视频一区| 精品无码国产一区二区三区AV | 久久久久成人精品无码中文字幕| 久久久久亚洲?V成人无码| 国产乱人无码伦av在线a| 亚洲av无码专区国产乱码在线观看| 中文无码熟妇人妻AV在线| 精品久久久久久中文字幕| 中文字幕av高清片| 亚洲精品无码专区在线播放| 久久久久亚洲精品无码网址| 狠狠躁狠狠爱免费视频无码| 97无码免费人妻超| 91无码人妻精品一区二区三区L | 国产在线观看无码免费视频 | 日韩免费人妻AV无码专区蜜桃| 亚洲熟妇无码乱子AV电影| 免费无码午夜福利片69| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在线观看 |