USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
    Opinion
    Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

    Trump's China policy to harm US consumers

    By Stephen S. Roach | China Daily | Updated: 2017-02-08 07:41

    Trump's China policy to harm US consumers

    US President Donald Trump returns a salute as he steps from Marine One upon his return to the White House in Washington February 6, 2017. [Photo/Agencies]

    US President Donald Trump is making a major miscalculation by going after China. The Trump administration appears to be contemplating a wide range of economic and political sanctions-from imposing punitive tariffs and designating China as a "currency manipulator" to embracing Taiwan and casting aside some 40 years of diplomacy framed around the one-China policy.

    This strategy will backfire. It is based on the mistaken belief that a newly muscular United States has all the leverage in dealing with its presumed adversary, and that any Chinese response is hardly worth considering. Nothing could be further from the truth.

    Yes, the US is one of China's largest export markets-and thus a central pillar of its spectacular 35-year development trajectory. Closing off the US market would certainly crimp Chinese economic growth.

    But the US has also become heavily dependent on China, which is now America's third-largest and fastest-growing export market. And, as the owner of more than $1.25 trillion in Treasuries and other dollar-based assets, China has played a vital role in funding the US' chronic budget deficits-in effect, lending much of its surplus savings to a US that has been woefully derelict in saving enough to support its own economy.

    This two-way dependency-the economic equivalent of what psychologists call codependency-has deep roots. Back in the early 1980s, China was desperate for a new source of economic growth. Coming out of a destructive bout of stagflation in the late 1970s and early 1980s, the US also needed a new economic recipe. The hard-pressed American consumer solved both problems, by becoming a powerful source of external support for Chinese growth and by benefiting from the lower prices of products made in China.

    The two countries thus entered into an awkward marriage of convenience that served each other's needs. China built an increasingly powerful economy as the "Ultimate Producer" while the US embraced the ethos of "Ultimate Consumer".

    Interactions between the two economies became increasingly comfortable and ultimately addictive-so much so that these codependents were keen to enable each other's economic identities. The US opened the door to China's accession to the World Trade Organization in 2001-a milestone in China's ascendancy as the "Ultimate Producer". And China's voracious appetite for Treasuries in the early 2000s helped keep US interest rates low, sustaining the froth in asset markets that allowed the "Ultimate Consumer" to live well beyond its means-until the music stopped in 2008.

    As in the case of humans, economic codependency is ultimately a very destructive relationship. Blinded by the gratification phase of codependency, both the US and China lost their way. Each became so caught up in its role of serving the other that both effectively repressed their economic sense of self. Therein lies the ultimate twist of codependency: one partner invariably looks inward and turns on the other, in order to recapture that missing piece of its identity.

    That's where Trump enters the equation, by targeting China as the villain that purportedly prevents the US from being great. Trump has assembled a team of like-minded senior trade advisers to plan the attack. From Peter Navarro as director of the National Trade Council, to Wilbur Ross as commerce secretary, Robert Lighthizer as US trade representative, and Rex Tillerson as secretary of state, the new US administration's anti-China biases are without modern precedent.

    Yet their battle plan overlooks a critical risk: codependency is a highly reactive relationship. When one partner changes the terms of engagement, the other, feeling scorned, usually responds in kind. In the aftermath of the provocative Dec 2 phone call between Trump and Taiwan leader Tsai Ing-wen, stunned Chinese mainland officials said little at first.

    But as Trump's China-bashing strategy started to crystallize around the advisers he appointed and the issues he raised, the mainland official media finally warned that "big sticks" would be used in defense, if need be.

    This is very much in keeping with what could be expected from the reactive phase of a destabilized codependency. The scorned partner, China, is threatening to hit back. And now the US will have to face the consequences.

    Smugly confident that the US has nothing to fear, the Trump administration could quickly feel the full wrath of Chinese retaliation. If it follows through with its threats, expect China to reciprocate with sanctions on US companies operating there, and ultimately with tariffs on US imports-hardly trivial considerations for a growth-starved US economy. Also expect China to be far less interested in buying Treasury debt-a potentially serious problem, given the expanded federal budget deficits that are likely under "Trumponomics".

    But the greatest tragedy for the US may well be the toll all of this takes on the American consumer. "America first"-whether it comes at the expense of China or via the so-called border-tax equalization that appears to be a central feature of proposed corporate tax reforms-will unwind many of the efficiencies of global supply chains that hold down consumer goods prices in the US (think Wal-Mart).

    With their incomes and jobs under long and sustained pressure, American consumers count on low prices for their economic survival. If Trump's China policy causes those prices to rise, the middle class will be the biggest loser of all.

    Sino-American codependency poses a formidable challenge to Trump's strategy of China bashing. It frames the ominous prospect of a rupture in the world's most important economic relationship, with potentially devastating spillovers on the rest of the world.

    The author is a faculty member at Yale University and former chairman of Morgan Stanley Asia, and the author of Unbalanced: The Codependency of America and China.

    Most Viewed in 24 Hours
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    国产精品亚洲αv天堂无码| 日韩乱码人妻无码中文字幕| 在线欧美中文字幕农村电影| 亚洲欧洲美洲无码精品VA | 亚洲中文字幕无码一区| 影院无码人妻精品一区二区| 无码毛片视频一区二区本码 | 亚洲AV永久无码精品一区二区国产 | 本道天堂成在人线av无码免费| 中文字幕手机在线观看| 中文亚洲AV片在线观看不卡| 日韩欧国产精品一区综合无码| 亚洲爆乳精品无码一区二区三区 | 日本高清免费中文在线看| 中文字幕专区高清在线观看| 国产成人精品无码播放| 亚洲2022国产成人精品无码区| 日韩精品无码免费专区午夜| 狠狠综合久久综合中文88| 中文字幕亚洲欧美日韩在线不卡| 乱人伦人妻中文字幕无码| 国产激情无码一区二区app| 人妻丰满av无码中文字幕| 亚洲AV无码久久精品色欲| 中文字幕无码乱人伦| 熟妇人妻中文av无码| 无码av人妻一区二区三区四区| 日本中文字幕在线电影| 亚洲精品97久久中文字幕无码 | 国产中文字幕在线| 日本阿v网站在线观看中文| 亚洲中文字幕无码久久精品1 | 日本乱中文字幕系列| а天堂8中文最新版在线官网| 免费无码中文字幕A级毛片| 亚洲午夜福利精品无码| 超清中文乱码字幕在线观看| 亚洲AV区无码字幕中文色| 欧美日韩中文字幕久久伊人| 最新中文字幕在线| A级毛片无码久久精品免费|