USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
    Opinion
    Home / Opinion / Opinion Line

    Forces fighting fake goods would be more effective working together

    China Daily | Updated: 2017-03-01 07:57

    Forces fighting fake goods would be more effective working together

    A view of Alibaba Group's headquarters in Hangzhou, East China's Zhejiang province, March 21, 2016. [Photo/Xinhua]

    ON MONDAY, DOMESTIC E-COMMERCE GIANT ALIBABA announced that in 2016 it had found 4,495 instances of businesses making or selling fake goods. The judiciary investigated 1,184 of them, yet only 33 people have received sentences. Beijing News comments:

    Fake goods have always been a major headache for Alibaba. Yet the number of people found guilty of making and selling fake goods is so small that people accuse the judiciary of not enforcing the law properly.

    This is not the case, as the judiciary has on several occasions vowed to strike the illegal interest chain of counterfeit goods. The true cause is Alibaba has the information while the judiciary has the power, yet the two do not work well together to tackle the issue.

    E-commerce platforms such as Alibaba have information on all the businesses they host. For instance, the IP address, physical address and ID number of anybody who sells goods on their platform is recorded, and Alibaba could easily locate a seller identified as retailer of fake goods. Yet Alibaba does not have the power to enforce law, so it cannot punish the fake goods sellers, nor is it the holder of the trademarks being violated so it cannot sue the fake goods sellers.

    The judiciary has the power but lacks the necessary evidence to prove a case, since, when it comes to e-commerce, the judiciary's evidence requirements are not up to date with modern technologies.

    The companies holding trademarks, the e-commerce platform, and the judiciary are all working to fight fake goods, but it seems they are working in different directions and they lack the necessary coordination.

    This situation must be changed. The judiciary needs to upgrade its concept of evidence and learn more about modern technologies, while the e-commerce platforms need to explain their evidence in plainer words, so that the forces fighting against fake goods can more effectively unite.

    Most Viewed in 24 Hours
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    无码人妻精品一区二| 亚洲精品无码成人片久久| 国产AV无码专区亚洲AV漫画| 狠狠躁狠狠爱免费视频无码| 无码人妻丝袜在线视频| 一本之道高清无码视频| 久久精品亚洲中文字幕无码麻豆 | 亚洲AV无码专区国产乱码电影| 涩涩色中文综合亚洲| 国产午夜鲁丝无码拍拍| 国产日韩AV免费无码一区二区| 免费人妻无码不卡中文字幕系| 久久久久亚洲精品无码网址| 无码人妻精品一区二区三区久久 | 日韩精品无码免费专区午夜| 一本大道无码日韩精品影视| 无码精品一区二区三区免费视频| 精品高潮呻吟99av无码视频| 中文字幕免费视频一| 天堂√中文最新版在线下载| 宅男在线国产精品无码| 无码不卡亚洲成?人片| 97无码免费人妻超| 国产精品三级在线观看无码| 无码精品久久久天天影视 | 视频一区二区中文字幕| 中文字幕av无码专区第一页| 中文字幕无码一区二区三区本日| 国精品无码A区一区二区| 2021国产毛片无码视频| 国产a级理论片无码老男人| 日韩精品无码一区二区中文字幕 | 777久久精品一区二区三区无码| 无码人妻精品中文字幕免费| 亚洲AV无码国产精品色午友在线| 中文字幕无码高清晰| 最新版天堂资源中文网| 欧美亚洲精品中文字幕乱码免费高清 | 亚洲av永久无码精品国产精品| 夜夜添无码一区二区三区| 国产成年无码AV片在线韩国|