USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
    Opinion
    Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

    The not-so-dire future of work in the age of technology

    By Zia Qureshi | China Daily | Updated: 2017-10-31 07:33

    The not-so-dire future of work in the age of technology

    A staff member interacts with Xiaofa, a robot that provides simple legal advice and guidance for litigants, at Beijing No 1 Intermediate People's Court on Oct 12. [Zou Hong/China Daily]

    The future of work is a hot topic nowadays. It has inspired a seemingly endless train of analyses, commentaries and conferences, and it featured prominently in recent annual meetings of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. For good reason: new technologies-digitization, robotics and artificial intelligence-have far-reaching implications for employment. But, contrary to how the story is often framed, a happy ending is possible.

    The debate often skews toward the melodramatic, foretelling a future in which machines drive humans out of work. According to some bleak estimates, 47 percent of jobs are at risk in the United States; 57 percent in the OECD countries; two-thirds in developing economies; and half of all jobs globally (about 2 billion).

    Similar dire predictions of large-scale job destruction and high tech-driven structural unemployment accompanied previous major episodes of automation, including by renowned economists. But technological change acted as a powerful driver of productivity and employment growth.

    One key reason is that the technological innovations that destroy some existing jobs also create new ones. While new technologies reduce demand for low-to middle-skill workers in routine jobs, such as clerical work and repetitive production, they also raise demand for higher-skill workers in technical, creative and managerial fields. A recent analysis estimates that new tasks and job titles explain about half of the recent employment growth in the US.

    Given this, the evolution of work should be viewed as a process of dynamic adjustment, not as a fundamentally destructive process that we should seek to slow. To erect barriers to innovation, such as taxes on robots, which some have proposed as a way to ease the pressure on workers, would be counterproductive. Instead, measures should focus on equipping workers with the higher-level skills that a changing labor market demands, and supporting workers during the adjustment process.

    So far, education and training have been losing the race with technology. Shortages of the technical and higher-level skills demanded by new technologies are partly responsible for the paradox of booming technology and slowing productivity growth in advanced economies: the shortage of skills has constrained the diffusion of innovations. Imbalances between supply and demand have also fueled income inequality, by increasing the wage premiums that those with the right skills can command.

    To address these shortcomings, education and training programs must be revamped and expanded. As the old career path of "learn, work, retire" gives way to one of continuous learning-a process reinforced by the aging of many economies' workforces-options for re-skilling and lifelong education must be scaled up.

    This will demand innovations in the content, delivery, and financing of training, as well as new models for public-private partnerships. At the same time, countries must facilitate workers' ability to change jobs through reforms to their labor markets and social safety nets. This means shifting the focus from backward-looking labor-market policies, which seek to protect workers in existing jobs, to future-oriented measures, such as innovative insurance mechanisms and active labor-market policies.

    Moreover, social contracts based on formal long-term employer-employee relationships will need to be overhauled, with benefits such as retirement and health care made more portable and adapted to evolving work arrangements, including the expanding "gig" economy.

    On both of these fronts, France is setting a positive example. Early this year, the country launched a portable "personal activity account", which enables workers to accrue rights to training across multiple jobs, rather than accumulating such rights only within a specific position or company.

    Technological change will continue to pose momentous challenges to labor markets across economies, just as it has in the past. But, with smart, forward-looking policies, we can meet those challenges head-on-and ensure that the future of work is a better job.

    The author, a former director of development economics at the World Bank, is a non-resident senior fellow at the Brookings Institution.

    Project Syndicate

    Most Viewed in 24 Hours
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    亚洲午夜无码片在线观看影院猛| 亚洲一日韩欧美中文字幕欧美日韩在线精品一区二 | 人妻无码一区二区三区免费| 中文国产成人精品久久亚洲精品AⅤ无码精品| 最近中文字幕在线| 无码人妻精品一区二区蜜桃AV| 亚洲日产无码中文字幕| 最近高清中文在线国语字幕5| 一本大道无码日韩精品影视| 日木av无码专区亚洲av毛片| 亚洲日韩AV一区二区三区中文| 中日精品无码一本二本三本| 成人免费无码H在线观看不卡| 亚洲不卡中文字幕无码| 高清无码午夜福利在线观看| 中文无码制服丝袜人妻av| 国产成人精品无码片区在线观看 | 久久精品中文字幕一区| 亚洲免费无码在线| 91久久九九无码成人网站| 亚洲AV无码久久精品色欲| 亚洲日本va午夜中文字幕久久| 无码中文av有码中文a| 日本妇人成熟免费中文字幕| 免费无码专区毛片高潮喷水| 国产成A人亚洲精V品无码性色| 亚洲精品~无码抽插| 无码粉嫩小泬无套在线观看| 精品人妻无码专区中文字幕| 99re热这里只有精品视频中文字幕| 亚洲国产精品成人AV无码久久综合影院| 精品久久久久久无码专区| 日韩精品中文字幕无码一区| 色噜噜综合亚洲av中文无码| 亚洲成A人片在线观看无码不卡| 亚洲国产精品无码久久久蜜芽| 婷婷四虎东京热无码群交双飞视频 | 亚洲国产精品无码专区影院 | 精品无码国产一区二区三区AV| 蜜桃成人无码区免费视频网站| 人妻无码αv中文字幕久久琪琪布 人妻无码第一区二区三区 |