Research accepted, along with a check

    Updated: 2013-04-21 07:50

    By Gina Kolata(The New York Times)

      Print Mail Large Medium  Small

     Research accepted, along with a check

    Jeffrey Beall, a research librarian at the University of Colorado at Denver, has developed a blacklist of "predatory open-access" journals. Kevin Moloney for The New York Times

    The scientists who were recruited to appear at a conference called Entomology-2013 thought they had been selected to make a presentation to the leading professional association of scientists who study insects.

    But they found out they were wrong. The prestigious, academically sanctioned conference they had in mind has a slightly different name: Entomology 2013 (without the hyphen). The one they had signed up for featured speakers who were recruited by e-mail, not vetted by leading academics. Those who agreed to appear were later charged a hefty fee for the privilege, and almost anyone who paid got a spot on the podium that could be used to exaggerate a resume.

    "I think we were duped," one of the scientists wrote to the Entomological Society.

    Those scientists had stumbled into a parallel world of pseudo-academia, complete with prestigiously titled conferences and journals that sponsor them. Many of the journals and meetings have names that are nearly identical to those of established, well-known publications and events.

    Steven Goodman, a dean and professor of medicine at Stanford University in California and the editor of the journal Clinical Trials, which has its own imitators, called this phenomenon "the dark side of open access," the movement to make scholarly publications freely available.

    The number of these journals and conferences has exploded in recent years as scientific publishing has shifted from a traditional business model for professional societies and organizations built almost entirely on subscription revenues to open access, which relies on authors or their backers to pay for the publication of papers online, where anyone can read them.

    Some researchers are now raising the alarm about what they see as the proliferation of online journals that will print seemingly anything for a fee. They warn that nonexperts doing online research will have trouble distinguishing credible research from junk.

    "They will not know from a journal's title if it is for real or not," Dr. Goodman said.

    Researchers also say that universities are facing new challenges in assessing the resumes of academics. Are the publications they list in highly competitive journals or ones masquerading as such?

    And some academics say they have found it difficult to disentangle themselves from these journals once they mistakenly agree to serve on their editorial boards.

    Research accepted, along with a check

    Jeffrey Beall, a research librarian at the University of Colorado in Denver, has developed a blacklist of what he calls "predatory open-access journals." There were 20 publishers on his list in 2010, and now there are more than 300. He estimates that there are as many as 4,000 predatory journals today.

    "This is easy money, very little work, a low barrier start-up," he said.

    Journals on what has become known as "Beall's list" generally do not post the fees they charge on their Web sites and may not even inform authors of them until after an article is submitted. They barrage academics with e-mail invitations to submit articles and to be on editorial boards.

    One of the most prolific publishers on Beall's list, Srinubabu Gedela, the director of the Omics Group, has about 250 journals and charges authors as much as $2,700 per paper. Dr. Gedela, who lists a Ph.D. from Andhra University in India, says on his Web site that he "learnt to devise wonders in biotechnology."

    Open-access publishers say that the papers they publish are reviewed and that their businesses are legitimate and ethical.

    "There is no compromise on quality review policy," Dr. Gedela wrote in an e-mail.

    Paulino Martinez, a doctor in Celaya, Mexico, said he was gullible enough to send two articles in response to an e-mail invitation he received last year from The Journal of Clinical Case Reports. They were accepted. Then came a bill saying he owed $2,900. He was shocked, having had no idea there was a fee for publishing. He asked to withdraw the papers, but they were published anyway.

    The journal offered to reduce his bill to $2,600. Finally, after a year and many e-mails and a phone call, the journal forgave the money it claimed he owed.

    Dr. Martinez said: "I am a doctor in a hospital in the province of Mexico, and I don't have the amount they requested."

    The New York Times

    (China Daily 04/21/2013 page11)

    中文字幕亚洲综合久久菠萝蜜| 国产精品热久久无码av| 亚洲人成人无码网www国产| 久久午夜福利无码1000合集| 亚洲无码视频在线| 国产av永久无码天堂影院| 中文字幕永久一区二区三区在线观看| 无码精品久久一区二区三区| 日韩精品无码久久久久久| 中文字幕无码第1页| 无码国产精品一区二区免费式影视 | 国产精品VA在线观看无码不卡| 日韩免费在线中文字幕| 中文无码伦av中文字幕| 九九久久精品无码专区| 精品日韩亚洲AV无码| 日韩AV无码久久一区二区| 久久久久精品国产亚洲AV无码| 亚洲中文字幕无码专区| 国产成人无码区免费内射一片色欲| 台湾佬中文娱乐网22| 日韩欧美一区二区不卡中文| 色综合久久无码中文字幕| 久久中文字幕人妻丝袜| 一区二区三区无码高清视频| 日韩久久无码免费毛片软件| 久久亚洲AV成人无码国产| 狠狠躁狠狠躁东京热无码专区 | 成 人无码在线视频高清不卡| 无码精品国产VA在线观看| 色欲A∨无码蜜臀AV免费播| 无码国产69精品久久久久网站| 无码人妻精品中文字幕免费| 无码无遮挡又大又爽又黄的视频 | 亚洲爆乳无码专区| 亚洲AV无码久久精品狠狠爱浪潮| 无套中出丰满人妻无码| 精品一区二区三区无码免费视频| 国产亚洲情侣一区二区无码AV| 亚洲爆乳无码精品AAA片蜜桃| 在线精品自拍无码|