Fate of a musical in the crowd's hands

    Updated: 2013-07-07 08:34

    By Patrick Healy(The New York Times)

      Print Mail Large Medium  Small

     Fate of a musical in the crowd's hands

    Dial testing, common in politics, television and music, has now arrived in the theater. In Portland, Oregon, audience members register their opinions. Leah Nash for The New York Times

    Fate of a musical in the crowd's hands

    PORTLAND, Oregon - Seven minutes into his new musical, "Somewhere in Time," the Broadway producer Ken Davenport leapt off his stool and began pointing. Not at the stage, but at a nearby laptop that showed - in a fever-chart line - the reactions of 60 audience members as they turned hand-held dials among three choices: "Love this part," "Neutral about this part" and "Hate this part."

    The dials seemed to pinpoint a problem with the song "Tick Tick Tick": the fever line slid as the main character, Richard, lamenting the rush of life, was interrupted by dry dialogue from his brother.

    "The dials matched my instincts," Mr. Davenport said during intermission at Portland Center Stage here, where he was trying this system for the first time for the musical's world premiere. "By the time we get the show to New York, I bet we'll drop that dialogue."

    Thus dial testing, common in politics, television and movies, has now arrived in the theater. The very idea of it is raising questions in the industry about what makes good theater.

    "Did Beethoven ask, 'Was the second movement too dull?' This is scary. Do we want to test-market Broadway until it becomes a theme park?" said Emanuel Azenberg, a producer for 45 years.

    Focus groups and audience surveys are increasingly part of theater already, to the distress of some producers like Mr. Azenberg, who see them as crutches that lead to simplistic shows. Several producers said dials were the enemy of groundbreaking work.

    Others, like Sue Frost, who used focus groups on her show "Memphis" - which won the best musical Tony in 2010 - were intrigued but skeptical that dials would catch on among Broadway producers because the technology might make audiences "so hypercritical that you get more data and opinions than are useful."

    "I also believe that I can tell a lot by standing in the back every night and listening to the audience," she added. "You know when they're bored, when a song is going too long."

    This old-school approach - relying on eyes and ears - evokes the era of auteur-producers like David Merrick and Harold Prince, who began new musicals out of town and compiled fix-it lists based on their aesthetic sensibilities, the body language of audiences and feedback from friends and critics. The reality of Broadway today is that 75 percent of shows lose money.

    "Why not use dials and every other tool possible to create more musicals that please audiences and turn a profit?" said Damian Bazadona of Situation Interactive, a marketing company that works on Broadway shows.

    Frank Luntz, a Republican consultant who pioneered dial-testing in political messaging and also has done dial-testing for TV shows, said the feedback did not guarantee success "but oftentimes can prevent failure."

    "I'm a little surprised Broadway is doing this, to be honest," he added. "Producers have a vision in their head, and they don't want the masses affecting or impacting that vision."

    Mr. Davenport said the dials were guidance, not a veto, for his judgment about "Somewhere in Time," based on a 1980 film about a playwright who travels back through the years to pursue a romance with an actress. The movie, which starred Christopher Reeve, had bad reviews but earned fans, particularly among women - leading Mr. Davenport to view "Somewhere in Time" as a pretested brand that might appeal on Broadway, since two-thirds of audiences there are female.

    Over three performances of dial-testing, no single song bombed, but parts of songs and scenes caused consistent dips in the fever line. One musical number that received the show's highest dial score - 80 out of a possible 100 - was "A Trip to the Grand," which delivered ballroom choreography and lavish period costumes, the sort of big production number that musical traditionalists love.

    "This Portland production cost $1 million, and our Broadway production will cost $10 million, but that score of 80 tells me that maybe ours should cost $11 million," Mr. Davenport said. "Maybe another $1 million could get us to 90 in that number."

    The New York Times

    (China Daily 07/07/2013 page12)

    中文字幕无码一区二区免费 | 最近免费最新高清中文字幕韩国| 国产丰满乱子伦无码专区| AV色欲无码人妻中文字幕| 无码专区—VA亚洲V天堂| 波多野结衣中文在线播放| 国产精品成人无码久久久久久| 免费无码一区二区三区蜜桃| 亚洲VA中文字幕无码一二三区| 日韩丰满少妇无码内射| 国精品无码一区二区三区在线蜜臀| 中文字幕AV中文字无码亚| 黑人无码精品又粗又大又长| 无码国内精品人妻少妇 | 亚洲中文久久精品无码ww16| 亚洲成人中文字幕| 日韩亚洲不卡在线视频中文字幕在线观看| 日韩av无码中文字幕| 亚洲av无码一区二区三区在线播放| 中文字幕亚洲一区二区va在线| 人妻无码αv中文字幕久久琪琪布 人妻无码中文久久久久专区 | 一级中文字幕免费乱码专区| 亚洲中文字幕日产乱码高清app| 狠狠精品干练久久久无码中文字幕| 久久青青草原亚洲av无码app| 亚洲国产精品无码久久| 97无码人妻福利免费公开在线视频| 中文字幕日韩第十页在线观看| 日韩中文字幕在线播放| 精品人妻中文字幕有码在线| 天堂а√在线中文在线最新版| 日韩一本之道一区中文字幕| 中文字幕亚洲码在线| 最近的中文字幕在线看视频| 久久人妻AV中文字幕| 国产中文字幕在线观看| 国产中文字幕乱人伦在线观看| 精品久久久久久无码中文字幕| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线观看| 中文字幕一区二区免费| 中文字幕无码AV波多野吉衣|