Senate Dems fail to cut off war funds

    (AP)
    Updated: 2007-05-17 08:36

    WASHINGTON - Anti-war Democrats in the Senate failed in an attempt to cut off funds for the Iraq war on Wednesday, a lopsided bipartisan vote that masked growing impatience within both political parties over President Bush's handling of the four-year conflict.


    Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nev., left, Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., center, and Sen. Richard Durbin, D-Ill., wait for the start of their Iraq news conference, Wednesday, May 16, 2007, on Capitol Hill in Washington. [AP]

    The 67-29 vote against the measure left it far short of the 60 needed to advance. More than half the Senate's Democrats supported the move, exposing divisions within the party but also marking a growth in anti-war sentiment from last summer, when only a dozen members of the rank and file backed a troop withdrawal deadline.

    "It was considered absolute heresy four months ago" to stop the war, said Sen. Russell Feingold of Wisconsin, author of the measure to cut off funds for most military operations after March 31, 2008.

    Ironically, the vote also cleared the way for the Democratic-controlled Congress to bow to Bush's wishes and approve a war funding bill next week stripped of the type of restrictions that drew his veto earlier this spring.

    Democrats vowed in January to force an end to the war, and nowhere is the shift in sentiment more evident than among the party's presidential contenders in the Senate.

    For the first time, Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York, Barack Obama of Illinois and Joe Biden of Delaware joined Sen. Chris Dodd in lending support to the notion of setting a date to end US participation in the war.

    Clinton, the Democrats' presidential front-runner in most early polls, has adamantly opposed setting a date for a troop withdrawal, and she gave conflicting answers during the day when asked whether her vote signified support for a cutoff in funds.

    "I'm not going to speculate on what I'll be voting on in the future," she said at midday. But a few hours later she said: "I support the ... bill. That's what this vote ... was all about."

    Other Democrats were unmistakably clear.

    "How many more soldiers do we have to bury? How many more do we have to bring into our military and veterans hospitals? How many more thousands of innocent Iraqis have to die before we finally accept our responsibility to bring this war to an end?" asked Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois.

    Republicans voted unanimously against the measure, and several judged it harshly. Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the GOP leader, said it fixed a "surrender date" for the United States.

    There were 28 Democrats in favor of advancing the bill, and 19 opposed.

    "An arbitrary cutoff date would take away an important negotiating tool," said Sen. Jim Webb, of Virginia, a Democratic critic of the war elected to his first term last November. He noted that the administration had recently taken steps to engage Iran in diplomacy in hopes of easing the sectarian violence in neighboring Iraq.

    The vote occurred as Congress pursued multiple objectives in connection with a war that has claimed the lives of more than 3,400 US troops.

    Congressional leaders hope to send Bush legislation by the end of next week providing more than $90 billion to pay for the war through Sept. 30, the end of the fiscal year, and at least part of the reason for the day's events was to give lawmakers an outlet for their unhappiness.

    Several Republicans, led by Sen. John Warner of Virginia, proposed legislation that threatened a reduction in reconstruction funds if the Iraqi government fails to make progress toward a series of military and political goals, and provides for outside experts to report to lawmakers on the subject.

    "The Iraqi government, it strikes me, needs to understand that they're running out of time to get their part of the job done," said McConnell.

    But the same proposal would have given Bush authority to waive the requirement for Iraqi progress, and it drew objections from Democrats as a result.

    "It's is really very tepid, very weak," said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid .
    12  


    Top World News  
    Today's Top News  
    Most Commented/Read Stories in 48 Hours
    亚洲成AV人片天堂网无码| 亚洲精品无码成人片在线观看| 久久精品无码一区二区三区日韩| 亚洲一区二区中文| 免费a级毛片无码免费视频| 精品日韩亚洲AV无码一区二区三区| 无码AⅤ精品一区二区三区| 亚洲午夜福利AV一区二区无码| 中文字幕乱偷无码AV先锋| 久久AV高清无码| 一本加勒比HEZYO无码资源网| 色综合久久精品中文字幕首页| 久久久久亚洲AV无码专区网站| 西西午夜无码大胆啪啪国模| 亚洲欧美精品一区久久中文字幕| 久别的草原在线影院电影观看中文| 久久午夜无码鲁丝片| 亚洲精品无码午夜福利中文字幕| 久久五月精品中文字幕| 亚洲中文字幕一二三四区苍井空| 国产成人午夜无码电影在线观看 | 中文无码熟妇人妻AV在线| 国产AV无码专区亚汌A√| 日韩av无码一区二区三区| 亚洲AV无码专区在线播放中文| 无码人妻精品中文字幕免费东京热 | 亚洲人成无码网站久久99热国产| 久久精品无码专区免费东京热| 亚洲AV永久无码精品水牛影视 | 亚洲VA中文字幕无码一二三区| 无码毛片AAA在线| 日韩精品无码一区二区三区AV | 亚洲中文字幕无码专区| 最近中文国语字幕在线播放视频 | 最近中文字幕精彩视频| 日本中文字幕在线2020| 一本大道香蕉中文在线高清| 乱人伦中文视频高清视频| 人妻少妇看A偷人无码电影| 亚洲中文字幕不卡无码| 无码人妻精品一区二区三区久久 |