US OK'd troop terror hunts in Pakistan

    (AP)
    Updated: 2007-08-24 17:08

    Newly uncovered "rules of engagement" show the US military gave elite units broad authority more than three years ago to pursue suspected terrorists into Pakistan, with no mention of telling the Pakistanis in advance.

    The documents show what Army Rangers and other terrorist-hunting units were authorized to do earlier in the war on terror. Some of those same guidelines have remained in place, such as the right to "hot pursuit" across the border.

    Washington repeated assurances it would consult before any such incursions.

    But summaries of the rules of engagement on the Afghanistan-Pakistan border in April 2004 say chasing al-Qaida leaders across the frontier was fair game.

    One summary states that "Entry into PAK authorized for" the following reasons:

    -"Hot pursuit" of al-Qaida, Taliban and terrorist command-and-control targets "from AFG into Pakistan (must be continuous and uninterrupted)."

    -If the head of US Central Command, which oversees American forces in the Middle East and Central Asia, approved direct action "against The Big 3," listed as Osama bin Laden; his deputy, Ayman al-Zawahri; and Taliban supreme leader Mullah Omar. The three are still believed to be hiding in the border region.

    -If the Defense secretary approved such an incursion.

    Other grounds for incursions into Pakistan, according to this summary, were "personnel recovery," including rescuing troops after the downing of aircraft; and troops "in contact with" the enemy, meaning under fire.

    As for "geographic limits," the memo states: "General rule: penetrate no deeper than 10 km," or 6.2 miles.

    Told of the guidelines, Pakistani military spokesman Maj. Gen. Waheed Arshad said, "This is all nonsense. Pakistan never allowed the coalition forces to enter into our territory while chasing militants. There was no such agreement, there was no such understanding."

    Pentagon spokesman Lt. Col. Todd Vician said this week he could not comment. "As a policy we don't talk about rules of engagement, certainly not about current rules in place for any operations in Afghanistan, Iraq or any other operation," he said.

    The 2004 documents were included among 1,100 pages of investigative documents generated by the Army's probe into the death of NFL player-turned-Ranger Pat Tillman, whose platoon was operating in the region at the time.

    E-mail exchanges between Ranger officers in the documents make no mention of a requirement to inform Pakistan in advance of strikes into that country.

    However, one summary mentions a chain of required notifications, which resulted in Pakistan being apprised - apparently after the fact. One rule says "joint task force commander must inform CENTCOM immediately" and ensure the "Mil Liaison team" in Islamabad was notified.

    Operations officers had a hot line to that liaison office, which would in turn inform Pakistani officials, according to a US officer who served in the region and is knowledgable about operations within Afghanistan during that mid-2004 period. On some occasions, the officer said, Pakistanis would detect ground or air incursions and request explanations from the Americans, who would open inquiries.

    Interviews with officers in the field, and the public statements of top US commanders, indicate similar guidelines remain in place today.

    At a hearing of the Senate Armed Services Committee in March, Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., asked Army Lt. Gen. Douglas Lute, "Do we have to have the approval of the Pakistani government in hot pursuit across the border?"

    No, Lute replied. If US forces spot so much as a "hostile intent" against them and chase the threat toward the border, "then we have all the authorities we need to pursue, either with fires or on the ground, across the border," he said.

    Even a surveillance report of enemy fighters setting up a rocket and pointing it west into Afghanistan is enough to trigger a unilateral military response, said Lute, then the chief operations officer for the Joint Chiefs of Staff and now President Bush's deputy national security adviser - the "war czar" on Iraq and Afghanistan.

    Lt. Col. David Accetta, spokesman for US troops in Afghanistan, said last week he could not talk about rules of engagement along the Pakistan border. He did say, after an AP reporter informed him of Horrigan's comments, that the rules haven't changed since January, when Horrigan spoke.

    A high-ranking Ranger officer who has served in Afghanistan and is familiar with the current rules of engagement said that if he found himself "in contact" with the enemy at the border, he would feel authorized to chase them into Pakistan. He spoke on condition of anonymity because of the high sensitivity of the U.S.-Pakistan relationship.

    A tribal leader, Momin Khan, said the Americans took away five tribesmen. The Muslim cleric whose home was attacked was not there, but an explosion had killed eight people and wounded nine.

    The US military denied involvement, and Pakistan's chief Army spokesman said he couldn't confirm the raid.

    A week later, the CIA purportedly sent a Predator drone from Afghanistan into Pakistan, unsuccessfully firing missiles at al-Zawahri. The attack missed bin Laden's deputy but reportedly killed four other al-Qaida leaders - although that information was never verified - and 13 villagers. Pakistan officially condemned the attack and said it had no advance notice.

    In recent weeks, top Bush administration officials have staked out sometimes varying positions on the matter of penetrating Pakistani's borders.

    On August 5, Defense Secretary Robert Gates was cautious in describing how US officials would handle an incursion. "I think we would not act without telling (Pakistani President Gen. Pervez Musharraf) what we were planning to do," he said on NBC's "Meet the Press."

    That was far more tentative than what White House homeland security adviser Frances Townsend said last month when asked on Fox News why the US wasn't sending special operations forces and drones into Pakistan.

    "Well, just because we don't speak about things publicly doesn't mean we're not doing many of the things you're talking about," Townsend said. She didn't elaborate.

    On August 5 at Camp David with Afghan President Hamid Karzai, Bush wouldn't say whether he would consult with Pakistan before ordering US forces to act inside that country. "With real actionable intelligence, we will get the job done," Bush said, without elaborating.



    Top World News  
    Today's Top News  
    Most Commented/Read Stories in 48 Hours
    а中文在线天堂| 国产精品99久久久精品无码| 2014AV天堂无码一区| 无码av不卡一区二区三区| 国产成人亚洲综合无码| 无码人妻黑人中文字幕| 精品无码无人网站免费视频 | 国产成人无码一区二区三区| 日韩精品无码一区二区三区AV| 亚洲国产综合精品中文第一 | 国产精品无码无需播放器| 在线亚洲欧美中文精品| 色婷婷久久综合中文久久蜜桃av| 蜜桃成人无码区免费视频网站| 婷婷五月六月激情综合色中文字幕| 永久无码精品三区在线4| 国产在线无码一区二区三区视频 | 东京热人妻无码一区二区av| 中文字幕亚洲精品资源网| 中文资源在线官网| 亚洲乱亚洲乱少妇无码| 日韩视频无码日韩视频又2021| 久久亚洲精品无码AV红樱桃| 亚洲av永久无码精品国产精品| 中文字幕日韩第十页在线观看| 日本一区二区三区精品中文字幕| 中文字幕亚洲男人的天堂网络| 97人妻无码一区二区精品免费| 日韩精品少妇无码受不了| 亚洲AV综合色区无码一区| 岛国无码av不卡一区二区| 亚洲日韩精品A∨片无码| 精品欧洲AV无码一区二区男男| 中文字幕精品无码一区二区| 无码国产精品一区二区免费式直播| 亚洲JIZZJIZZ中国少妇中文| 狠狠精品久久久无码中文字幕 | 久久人妻少妇嫩草AV无码专区| 中文字幕国产91| 中文字幕丰满乱子无码视频| 超清无码无卡中文字幕|