US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
    World / Asia-Pacific

    Arbitration tribunal's jurisdiction challenged

    By LUIS LIU in Hong Kong and Zhang Yunbi in Beijing (China Daily) Updated: 2016-06-18 01:51

    Arbitration tribunal's jurisdiction challenged

    Daniel R. Fung, chairman of the Hong Kong-based Asia Pacific Institute of International Law (APIIL) receives interview by Xinhua June 16, 2016. [Photo/Xinhua]

    An international group of legal experts and lawyers have signed a legal opinion document questioning an arbitration tribunal's jurisdiction in a case filed against China by the Philippines.

    They have also voiced concern over the suitability of the tribunal to handle such an issue without considering the historical and political context, according to Hong Kong barrister Daniel Fung Wah-kin.

    "We hope to protect the integrity and reputation of the tribunal and the whole international law system," Fung said.

    In 2013, the Philippines unilaterally filed compulsory arbitration under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea challenging China's sovereignty in the area.

    Beijing has refused to be part of the arbitration and says the tribunal has no jurisdiction, while Manila has showed no indication of returning to bilateral negotiations.

    Others signing the document include Tony Carty, a British scholar and professor of international law at Tsinghua University, and Natalie Klein, professor and dean of Macquarie Law School in Sydney.

    Fung said they are awaiting a reply from the tribunal and have asked for an opportunity to present the case orally.

    Although the full text of the document has not been released to the media, its main point is that the tribunal has no jurisdiction over sovereignty disputes and maritime delimitation, as the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea does not issue such judgments.

    Huang Yao, dean of the School of Law at Sun Yat-sen University in Guangzhou, Guangdong province, said the tribunal has imposed its jurisdiction but has no legitimacy.

    Fung said that as Chinese people have had links to the islands in the South China Sea for more than 2,000 years, the tribunal should carry out adequate research into the country's rights and interests before making any judgment.

    "These questions should be settled by diplomatic negotiations in treaty form," Fung said.

    Kuen-chen Fu, dean of the South China Sea Institute at Xiamen University, said the tribunal should take the document for reference, but it has no obligation to accept it.

    Contact the writers at zhangyunbi@chinadaily.com.cn

    Trudeau visits Sina Weibo
    May gets little gasp as EU extends deadline for sufficient progress in Brexit talks
    Ethiopian FM urges strengthened Ethiopia-China ties
    Yemen's ex-president Saleh, relatives killed by Houthis
    Most Popular
    Hot Topics

    ...
    无码人妻一区二区三区在线视频| 久久久久久综合一区中文字幕 | 暴力强奷在线播放无码| 国产午夜无码片免费| 精品深夜AV无码一区二区老年| 精品无码国产自产拍在线观看蜜| 国产精品无码久久久久久| 久久久久亚洲精品中文字幕| 无码丰满熟妇一区二区| 无码日韩精品一区二区免费暖暖 | 曰韩无码AV片免费播放不卡| 亚洲AV无码成人精品区蜜桃| 中文字幕一区二区三区永久| 亚洲日产无码中文字幕| 天码av无码一区二区三区四区| 无码少妇一区二区三区浪潮AV| 7国产欧美日韩综合天堂中文久久久久 | 最近中文字幕免费大全| 中文字幕无码乱人伦| 50岁人妻丰满熟妇αv无码区| 亚洲精品无码专区在线在线播放| 中文字幕一区二区三区久久网站| 亚洲.欧美.中文字幕在线观看| 国产精品亚洲αv天堂无码| 人妻少妇偷人精品无码| 亚洲中文字幕无码久久综合网| 中文字幕日韩精品有码视频| 日韩视频中文字幕精品偷拍| 中文字幕免费观看| 日韩中文字幕免费视频| 亚洲中文字幕久久精品无码喷水| 亚洲AV无码资源在线观看| 天堂无码在线观看| 亚洲精品无码专区久久同性男| 久久无码国产| 亚洲无码黄色网址| 亚洲 欧美 国产 日韩 中文字幕| 忘忧草在线社区WWW中国中文| 中文字幕7777| √天堂中文官网在线| 最好看更新中文字幕|