USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
    World
    Home / World / Asia-Pacific

    US scholar: India should remember the history

    By CHEN WEIHUA in Washington | chinadaily.com.cn | Updated: 2017-08-03 13:27

    US experts have urged Indian troops to withdraw from the intruded Chinese territory and also called the two countries to resolve the issue diplomatically.

    Indian troops illegally crossed into the Sikkim section of the border between the two countries to Doklam, Chinese territory, in June, in an attempt to stop China's road construction going on there. The action drew strong protests from China.

    New Delhi has described China's road construction as a "significant change of the status quo with serious security implications for India", citing its geographic proximity to its vulnerable "Chicken's Neck" — the narrow stretch of territory connecting the majority of India to its more remote northeast areas.

    Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi told reporters in Bangkok on July 24 that it is very clear who is right and who is wrong in the standoff in Doklam, and that even senior Indian officials have publicly said that Chinese troops have not intruded into Indian territory.

    "In other words, India admitted that it has entered Chinese territory. The solution to this issue is simple, which is that they behave themselves and withdraw," Wang said, as quoted in a Chinese foreign ministry's statement.

    Jon Taylor, a professor of political science at the University of St Thomas in Houston, said the Indian military breached both international law and treaty convention by entering Chinese territory shortly after their Prime Minister Narendra Modi visited the US.

    "The incursion can be viewed as part of a greater strategic competition between China and India, one that is influenced by Trump's push for a closer partnership with India," he said.

    Taylor said that despite India's actions, China has remained restrained and tolerant. "I believe that this is because China wishes to preserve friendly China-India relations," he said, adding the need for a swift resolution of the issue is clear.

    But he said India does not understand the breadth of China's established presence on the Donglang(Doklam) Pass, nor its resolve to maintain its presence in the Donglangregion since it is indisputably a part of China's territory and under its effective jurisdiction.

    "India would do well to remember China's response and resolve during the 1962 border war. Continued provocations could lead to a much wider, and uglier, conflict that would inevitably result in a Chinese victory, again".

    Ryan Hass, a foreign policy fellow at the Brookings Institution, said although the timing and final contours for resolving the dispute remain as yet unknown, there is cause for cautious optimism that the two countries have the wisdom to peacefully resolve the dispute.

    "Chinese and Indian leaders are among the most talented and creative diplomats in the world," he said.

    "Beijing and New Delhi would benefit by focusing their energies now on creating a conducive environment for peaceful solutions to emerge," said Hass, who served as director for the Chinese mainland, Taiwan and Mongolia at the National Security Council in the Obama administration.

    Ted Carpenter, a senior fellow of defense and foreign policy studies at the Cato Institute, said the dispute should be addressed through patient, creative diplomacy by Beijing and New Delhi. "Both governments need to make resolving this troubling issue a very high priority," he said.

    Hass said the US could use the dispute as an opportunity to clarify privately for both China and India its strategic interest in stable and productive relations between the two Asian powers.

    "Beyond that, the United States should avoid involving itself in the dispute, either privately or publicly, as any such involvement likely will not help to calm tensions, but could have the unintended effect of hardening each side's position as well as souring US relations with one or both of the disputants," he said.

    The US has not taken a side so far. State Department spokeswoman Heather Nauertsaid on July 18 that the US is concerned about the ongoing situation there, saying both sides should work together to try to come up with some better sort of arrangement for peace.

    Most Viewed in 24 Hours
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    无码精品A∨在线观看中文| 国产成人AV片无码免费| 99久久精品无码一区二区毛片| 无码内射中文字幕岛国片| 无码国内精品久久人妻| 亚洲AV中文无码乱人伦在线视色| 国产99久久九九精品无码| 精品久久久无码人妻中文字幕| 天堂在线资源中文在线8| 久久国产精品无码HDAV| 韩国19禁无遮挡啪啪无码网站| 久久精品aⅴ无码中文字字幕不卡 久久精品aⅴ无码中文字字幕重口 | 911国产免费无码专区| 在线亚洲欧美中文精品| 亚洲成av人片在线观看天堂无码| 中文字幕AV中文字无码亚| 中文国产成人精品久久亚洲精品AⅤ无码精品 | 91久久九九无码成人网站| 中文字幕无码精品亚洲资源网久久| 日本阿v网站在线观看中文 | 欧美激情中文字幕| 亚洲精品97久久中文字幕无码| 久久亚洲AV成人无码国产| 中文字幕乱妇无码AV在线| 天堂Aⅴ无码一区二区三区| 国产乱码精品一区二区三区中文| 亚洲熟妇少妇任你躁在线观看无码 | 人看的www视频中文字幕| 亚洲Av无码国产情品久久 | www无码乱伦| 国产亚洲精久久久久久无码| 免费无码又爽又刺激高潮视频| 亚洲AV综合色区无码一区| 亚洲中文字幕无码久久综合网| 精品深夜AV无码一区二区老年| 中文无码人妻有码人妻中文字幕 | 无码精品A∨在线观看免费| 中文字幕亚洲综合久久菠萝蜜| 日韩人妻无码一区二区三区久久99 | 欧美麻豆久久久久久中文| 日本中文字幕免费看|