G20英文專題 中國在線首頁
    CHINA DAILY 英文首頁
     

    New law no great help to e-commerce

    There have been enough examples of government agencies spoiling a flourishing market by trying to make it develop "in a healthier way". One common sign of such a folly is that no public hearings are held, especially serious ones, before the new regulations are enacted.

    As a result, as often is the case, the implementation of those regulations tends to be awkward, sometimes giving rise to more problems than public benefits.

    Right now, judging from some of the opinions from the hundreds and thousands of individuals running their online retail business, the newly introduced "regulations toward promotion of informationization" by the municipal authorities of Beijing may be such a nuisance.

    According to the regulations, as of August 1, all who are engaged in electronic commerce may not continue their business unless they register with the city government and have a business license, while previously, they never needed that.

    But the authorities which introduced the new regulations have not made it clear whether they are aimed at taxing the small e-commerce merchants or at rendering a better protection for the customers. For the moment, nothing is mentioned. People can only guess.

    For Wang Juntao, a figure well-known in China's e-commerce circle as one of the first individuals to start the business, the unprecedented requirement of government license is without question to pave way for future taxation. Otherwise, what is the point, he told reporters.

    While for some officials of China E-Commerce Association, who spoke more diplomatically, the step "to rationally follow" in having all merchants register for government licenses is to collect a tax from them.

    There are people who argue that it would not matter to just have a test of the new regulations. The Beijing municipal regulations would not do a major harm, they say, because they affect only small merchants, of the so-called C2C type. In total, they do not make a significant business volume.

    A small volume it may be, keeping a cluster, and indeed one of the nation's largest clusters of online merchants in Beijing is more important than what can be measured in money terms.

    With the largest cluster of universities and university students in China, Beijing used to be an ideal place for the Internet startups. But since the mid-1990s, the city has failed to dominate the national market because many companies have relocated themselves to the south, most noticeably to Shanghai and Hangzhou.

    Local governments may not be the only reason for their relocations. But at least, no one, as far as I can remember, described the government service as extraordinary.

    Internet is a fluid marketplace after all. As a result of the municipal license requirement, I am afraid, more Internet companies would withdraw their physical presence from Beijing - especially some small and colorful ones - along with the diverse job opportunities they provide.

    Not long ago, CNNIC (China Internet Network Information Center) just reported in its survey that of the Chinese Internet population, the proportion of those who have ever bought things online is much lower than South Korea and the United States. A rapid development of e-commerce would need more merchants rather than fewer.

    If the true purpose of new regulations, as some municipal officials said, is to protect customers, then there can be many ways to do so, and to do it more effectively, such as to let the small merchants form their associations and communities, to regulate the few platform (or portal) providers rather than the much larger number of retailers and barter traders, to set up complaint hotlines, and to allow netizens to view the credit standing of the most frequent traders.

    The biggest loophole in the Beijing regulations is that it only affects the online retailers based within the Chinese capital city. If its purpose is really to protect customers, it does not hold any effect on business operators from elsewhere. Nor can the regulations prevent the spontaneous transactions among netizens who meet new people and discover new resources in the virtual space on a daily basis.

    E-mail: younuo@chinadaily.com.cn

    (China Daily 08/04/2008 page4)

     
      中國日報前方記者  
    中國日報總編輯助理黎星

    中國日報總編輯顧問張曉剛

    中國日報記者付敬
    創始時間:1999年9月25日
    創設宗旨:促國際金融穩定和經濟發展
    成員組成:美英中等19個國家以及歐盟

    [ 詳細 ]
      在線調查
    中國在向國際貨幣基金組織注資上,應持何種態度?
    A.要多少給多少

    B.量力而行
    C.一點不給
    D.其他
     
    本期策劃:中國日報網中國在線  編輯:孫恬  張峰  關曉萌  霍默靜  楊潔  肖亭  設計支持:凌雷  技術支持:沙益新
    | 關于中國日報網 | 關于中國在線 | 發布廣告 | 聯系我們 | 工作機會 |
    版權保護:本網站登載的內容(包括文字、圖片、多媒體資訊等)版權屬中國日報網站獨家所有,
    未經中國日報網站事先協議授權,禁止轉載使用。
    日韩精品无码一区二区三区四区 | 国产a级理论片无码老男人| 精品久久亚洲中文无码| 熟妇人妻AV无码一区二区三区| 中文字幕乱码人妻一区二区三区| 无码AV天堂一区二区三区| 五月丁香啪啪中文字幕| 久久中文字幕人妻熟av女| 精品视频无码一区二区三区| 亚洲精品无码AV中文字幕电影网站| 久久精品无码一区二区三区免费| 亚洲av日韩av高潮潮喷无码| 日本乱偷人妻中文字幕在线| 天天爽亚洲中文字幕| av无码播放一级毛片免费野外| 亚洲AV综合色区无码另类小说| 亚洲精品无码AV中文字幕电影网站| 中文在线天堂网WWW| 无码任你躁久久久久久老妇| 国产精品无码A∨精品影院| 亚洲国产a∨无码中文777| 中文字幕视频在线免费观看| 在线中文字幕av| 日本中文字幕中出在线| 熟妇人妻VA精品中文字幕| 亚洲AV无码资源在线观看| 人妻丰满?V无码久久不卡| 国产麻豆天美果冻无码视频| 精品无码久久久久国产| 久久久久久久久无码精品亚洲日韩 | 无码国产精品一区二区免费 | 最近最好最新2019中文字幕免费| 自拍中文精品无码| 中文字幕av无码一区二区三区电影| 亚洲?V无码乱码国产精品| 乱人伦中文视频在线| 日本中文字幕在线2020| 日日摸夜夜添无码AVA片| 在线a亚洲v天堂网2019无码| 亚洲一区二区三区AV无码| 无码专区AAAAAA免费视频|