G20英文專題 中國在線首頁
    CHINA DAILY 英文首頁
     

    Olympics lesson for city planners

    Who, other than young athletes-to-be in the world, would feel the greatest urge when watching the Olympic Games in Beijing? They must be the Chinese mayors and their city planning lieutenants.

    For the last couple of weeks, they were staring hungrily at, instead of the game floors and record bulletins, the Bird's Nest and Water Cube - two multi-billion-yuan main Olympic venues, and Beijing's all other new public facilities, roads and subways, and its shopping and restaurant streets, if not its blue sky. Many of them would be asking themselves questions about how to build their cities.

    Small wonder that Han Zheng, mayor of Shanghai, restated once again on August 19 the city's ambition to be China's international financial center to host as many types of financial markets as possible. The mayor pledged better integrated services in Lujiazui, the financial district in Pudong area, meaning greater convenience for the business community in the already glittering business center of Shanghai.

    Shanghai won't let Beijing steal the show. Nor will other cities let just Beijing and Shanghai be the only cities to keep changing their skylines by adding impressive new buildings every several months. On a less imaginative level, development is a game to keep up with the jones, and local officials all know how to do it.

    So at least in Chengdu and Suzhou, two southern cities, China has had two local-level look-alikes of the Bird's Nest. The one in Chengdu, estimated by the Chinese press to have cost around 1.2 billion yuan, has become a laughing stock for participants in Internet forums, as it was originally meant to be the municipal government's office, and for fear of mounting condemnation for its conspicuous waste of public funds, the municipal government attempted to sell it by auction, but only to find there were no bidding interests.

    Things become truly ugly when compared with the makeshift houses, just a short distance from the city, for the massive number of victims of the killer earthquake that recently struck Sichuan, a province of which Chengdu is the capital.

    The "Bird's Nest" in Suzhou, a commercial building as part of the convention and exhibition center of its new industrial area, does not seem to have caused any problem, although the project appears as much costly.

    Now that the 2008 Olympics has drawn to its close, local officials must have made up their minds as to how to realize the inspirations they had gained from Beijing. Are they going to build for themselves expensive copies of the Olympic architectures? Or, are they going to spend more on public facilities, as Han, the Shanghai mayor, has promised?

    We have no way to tell in which way the local officials are heading. It is going to be a test for both central government and the local lawmakers whether they can effectively curb officials' wasteful ambitions, as seen in the fake "Bird's Nest" in Chengdu.

    People can accept expensive building projects in public infrastructure and for commercial purposes. But they cannot tolerate a race, by officials from different cities which had barely lifted themselves out of poverty, to build luxury large houses for themselves. The success of the Beijing Olympics should not be allowed to be hijacked for this purpose.

    The real race, however, should take place in government spending on environmental protection. The largest, and costliest project to make the Beijing Olympics so successful is not the Bird's Nest, nor the Water Cube, but actually the relocation of the largest polluter of Beijing's air, the industrial Shougang Group. This is the true lesson that all local officials should learn.

    Now, after spending as much as 67.7 billion yuan ($10 billion), the steelmaker is moved to the seashore of Bohai Bay, with many of its old technologies replaced by the new ones.

    By contrast, the Bird's Nest cost only 3.2 billion yuan. Even the No 5 subway line in Beijing cost no more than 12 billion yuan, and the high-speed express rail to connect Beijing with Tianjin cost 14.3 billion yuan.

    E-mail: younuo@chinadaily.com.cn

    (China Daily 08/25/2008 page7)

     
      中國日報前方記者  
    中國日報總編輯助理黎星

    中國日報總編輯顧問張曉剛

    中國日報記者付敬
    創始時間:1999年9月25日
    創設宗旨:促國際金融穩定和經濟發展
    成員組成:美英中等19個國家以及歐盟

    [ 詳細 ]
      在線調查
    中國在向國際貨幣基金組織注資上,應持何種態度?
    A.要多少給多少

    B.量力而行
    C.一點不給
    D.其他
     
    本期策劃:中國日報網中國在線  編輯:孫恬  張峰  關曉萌  霍默靜  楊潔  肖亭  設計支持:凌雷  技術支持:沙益新
    | 關于中國日報網 | 關于中國在線 | 發布廣告 | 聯系我們 | 工作機會 |
    版權保護:本網站登載的內容(包括文字、圖片、多媒體資訊等)版權屬中國日報網站獨家所有,
    未經中國日報網站事先協議授權,禁止轉載使用。
    无码专区永久免费AV网站| 亚洲中文字幕无码久久精品1| 色婷婷综合久久久中文字幕| 亚洲国产精品无码久久久不卡| 亚洲色中文字幕无码AV| 潮喷无码正在播放| 亚洲中文字幕无码久久综合网| 欧美精品中文字幕亚洲专区| 91精品久久久久久无码 | 无码精品人妻一区二区三区漫画| 欧美日韩中文在线| 亚洲精品无码你懂的网站| 无码AV片在线观看免费| 成人无码a级毛片免费| 日韩中文字幕一区| 亚洲中文字幕日产乱码高清app| 毛片一区二区三区无码| 国产久热精品无码激情| 亚洲av永久无码精品网站| 日本无码小泬粉嫩精品图| 久久久久亚洲精品中文字幕| 中文字幕有码无码AV| 无码国产亚洲日韩国精品视频一区二区三区 | 中文有码vs无码人妻| 久久无码人妻精品一区二区三区| 人妻丰满av无码中文字幕| 无码人妻精品一区二区三区66 | 日木av无码专区亚洲av毛片| 亚洲中文久久精品无码ww16| 自拍中文精品无码| 日本在线中文字幕第一视频| 中文字幕日韩欧美一区二区三区| 中文午夜乱理片无码| 久本草在线中文字幕亚洲欧美| 日韩少妇无码喷潮系列一二三| 精品无码一级毛片免费视频观看| 99久久精品无码一区二区毛片| 播放亚洲男人永久无码天堂| 无码精品蜜桃一区二区三区WW| 亚洲?V无码乱码国产精品| 99久久精品无码一区二区毛片|