Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
    China
    Home / China / National affairs

    Tackling graft is good for a nation's economic future

    China Daily | Updated: 2017-09-19 07:22
    Share
    Share - WeChat

    US free market absolutist ideologists pump out more irrelevant and confusing rhetoric than a giant squid pours out ink - the wave of criticism for China's anti-corruption policies being a case in point.

    Critics claim China's economic slowdown is primarily due to President Xi Jinping's anti-corruption campaign, which has been carried out nationwide over the past five years, and that the country needs a drastic reduction in free private sector regulation to restore the sky-high annual growth rates it enjoyed for so many years.

    Nothing could be further from the truth. These critics are mistaking a positive process of economic transformation and the maturing of China's economy and society as signs of terminal structural weakness. This is similar to a doctor looking at the hormonal change and other physical changes of growing teenagers and diagnosing them as dying of terminal cancer or old age.

    While it is certainly true that China's export-driven growth has slowed in relative terms in recent years, it continues to enjoy massive surpluses, and China's economic growth and dynamism continue to dwarf those of other major Asian nations.

    Japan especially has still to shake off the dire effects of more than 25 years of economic stagnation. The simplistic pump-priming infusions of cash favored by Prime Minister Shinzo Abe have failed to remedy the situation.

    Were it not for massive spending on high-tech defense industries using know-how bought from the United States that is driving Japan's public sector even further into the red, the state of the Japanese economy would be even worse.

    The massive scale and achievements of China's anti-corruption program are willfully misunderstood in much of the Western media. Far from slowing growth, the anti-corruption campaign is preventing or at least greatly reducing the incidences of corruption that if left unattended would divert the benefits of growth to a handful of people at the top of the national pyramid.

    Correctly interpreted, the anti-corruption campaign should be seen not as the enemy of growth or as disrupting the benefits of growth, but rather as being essential to the growth process.

    It is a universal truth that as societies generate more wealth, a handful of oligarchs at the top, if left to their own devices, will seize for themselves all the economic and political power and administer it narrowly and selfishly.

    This was the pattern in the US during the half century of gigantic industrialization that followed the Civil War. The first two-thirds of the 20th century then saw long, slow and usually far too delayed efforts to slow down and eventually reverse this process.

    However, in the four decades since the election of president Ronald Reagan, the US government has increasingly abandoned its crucial role as a moderator of economic concentrations of power in the country.

    The result has been the devastating destruction of well-paying industrial jobs and the consequent growth of social pathologies across the US heartland, especially the current hard-drug pandemic.

    That is why in my book, Cycles of Change, which tracks the patterns in US politics from Thomas Jefferson to Barack Obama, I entitled the political era launched by Reagan in 1980-81 as "Evening in America" - since it heralded decline, not growth.

    The same US pundits who flatly refuse to acknowledge the corruption, unfair concentration of wealth and abdication by government of its responsibility to enforce economic and criminal justice have committed precisely the opposite error in the case of China. They look at policies that are both the consequence and necessary correction to economic success and industrial growth, and falsely mislabel them as signs of decline.

    The idea that any anti-corruption campaign, if energetically prosecuted, will make government departments inefficient, complacent and lazy is absurd fantasy. Observed experience and recorded history show that the opposite is invariably the case. Indeed, the biggest achievement of China's anti-corruption campaign in the past five years is the clean working style that it has instigated in the ruling Party and government.

    There are many reasons why China's growth in absolute terms has slowed, and Chinese leaders and economic planners have been coping with the impact of climate change patterns across Eurasia.

    China has been energetically investing in land and maritime communications networks across Asia and in cultivating vast quantities of land across sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America.

    These policies are proving immensely beneficial in raising the living standards and professional opportunities for hundreds of millions of people across China, and for billions more around the world.

    The economic history of all prosperous industrial nations shows that a society needs more anti-corruption monitoring and restraint as an economy grows, not less. It also shows that the central government must not abdicate its responsibilities to protect its own people from such forces, and must also be vigilant in ensuring the industrial base and economy as a whole do not suffer from unfair patterns of international trade.

    China's government has proven to be highly successful and responsible in carrying out these core obligations.

    On the contrary, it is US growth rates that have remained at miniscule levels for decades.

    According to Wall Street analyst Gerald Celente, median US income is now at 1999 levels; 51 percent of all people working full time in the US now earn only $30,000 or less and household ownership is at a 50-year low.

    China's economic policies have raised a larger number of people out of poverty in a shorter period of time than any other recorded period in history.

    The current slowing of overall growth rates and the success of the anti-corruption campaign therefore need to be recognized as inevitable and desirable outcomes of this remarkable success.

     

    Martin Sieff, senior fellow at the Global Policy Institute in Washington, US

    Top
    BACK TO THE TOP
    English
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
     
    亚洲国产精品无码久久九九 | 久久久久亚洲精品无码网址| 日韩中文字幕精品免费一区| 亚洲av中文无码乱人伦在线r▽| 无码毛片一区二区三区中文字幕| r级无码视频在线观看| 日韩精品无码一区二区三区AV| 区三区激情福利综合中文字幕在线一区亚洲视频1| 无码av最新无码av专区| 久久综合中文字幕| 亚洲AV中文无码乱人伦| 久久国产亚洲精品无码 | 无码人妻一区二区三区免费视频| 国产亚洲人成无码网在线观看| 国产爆乳无码视频在线观看| 中文字幕日本精品一区二区三区 | 精品多人p群无码| 色综合久久中文字幕无码| 青春草无码精品视频在线观| 无码人妻精品一区二区三区99仓本| 国产成人无码综合亚洲日韩 | 亚洲高清无码专区视频| 亚洲av中文无码乱人伦在线播放 | 播放亚洲男人永久无码天堂| 亚洲av永久无码精品表情包| 欧美日韩中文字幕在线| 99久久无色码中文字幕| 中文在线资源天堂WWW| 亚洲一区无码精品色| 亚洲国产av无码精品| 国产成人一区二区三中文 | 无码国产午夜福利片在线观看| 精品无码国产自产拍在线观看蜜| AV无码人妻中文字幕| 日韩AV无码中文无码不卡电影| 曰韩精品无码一区二区三区| 中文字幕av无码一区二区三区电影| 国模吧无码一区二区三区| 亚洲国产精品无码久久九九 | 无码专区AAAAAA免费视频| 精品无码免费专区毛片|