Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
    HongKong Comment(1)

    A few wrongs make a right

    HK Edition | Updated: 2017-09-26 08:02
    Share
    Share - WeChat

    The rule of law, supposedly dead because Joshua Wong Chi-fung and other activists were jailed, was given a new lease of life as former University of Hong Kong student union president Billy Fung Jing-en and his then vice-president Colman Li Fung-kei were given a lenient sentence for their roles in the HKU Council siege.

    But our rule of law is still in a critical condition. The latest concern is whether comments by lawmaker Junius Ho Kwan-yiu who called for pro-independence activists to be "killed mercilessly" would be investigated "fairly."

    Ho was busy lately with his campaign to pressure the HKU to sack "Occupy" co-founder and associate law professor Benny Tai Yiu-ting. He was quite successful in building up a momentum and a following. Then, three words tripped him up: "Kill without mercy."

    The occasion was a rally attended by thousands against Tai and those advocating "Hong Kong independence" on university campuses. Afterward, Ho was in an agitated state and surrounded by reporters. He then launched a tirade against them saying they were ignorant, stupid and biased.

    "If 'Hong Kong independence' advocates are subverting the fate of a country ... why not kill them?" Ho asked. "To 'kill them without mercy' means we deplore wrongdoers like our enemies."

    The dissidents exploited Ho's slip of the tongue immediately and issued a statement. In the statement, 22 dissident lawmakers said Ho, as a legislator and lawyer, had "gone beyond the bottom line of freedom of speech and morals".

    "We strongly reprimand his cold-blooded speech, as it advocated direct violence and allegedly broke the law," the statement read.

    They then added that according to the Public Order Ordinance, it is a criminal offense for any person to "use threatening, abusive or insulting words" in public and with intent to provoke a breach of the peace. It is also a criminal offense for anyone to make any public statement "which is likely to incite or induce any person to kill or do physical injury to anyone else".

    "The police have arrested people who use hate speech in the past. Ho has broken the law and the police and the Department of Justice should take action," the statement added.

    What the dissidents' statement was aiming at is quite childish. They obviously have the "democracy wall controversy" in mind when they say Ho has "gone beyond the bottom line of freedom of speech and morals".

    Similarly, they invoked the Public Order Ordinance because Joshua Wong, Alex Chow Yong-kang and Nathan Law Kwun-chung went on trial and was convicted for this crime. Needless to say, the prosecution had successfully sought a heavier sentence against the three on the grounds that the word "retake" in their rallying cry to "retake Civic Square" indicated the use of violence.

    Our dissidents are now smiling smugly. They suggest that law enforcers now apparently are fine with people openly using the word "kill" at a public rally. This smacks of double standards.

    But I must say, the joke is on the dissidents. What kind of "democrats" who claim they themselves are being oppressed would tell the authorities to oppress others so as not to appear inconsistent? What is more important for them, consistency or freedom and rights?

    If Junius Ho is also convicted by the Public Order Ordinance, will our dissidents respect it from now on and not utter a word when in future the same law is used to prosecute other public order disrupters? In other words, will our dissidents also be consistent? I don't think so.

    This brings us back to Chris Patten, who was in town again recently. It was unfortunate that he needs excuses to visit our city, and a book takes a long time to finish. If I were him, I would have blogged instead so that every time a blog post is published I could then comment on Hong Kong's current affairs.

    All self-respecting retired politicians know that it is not prudent to comment on the job they have left behind. This is especially true with a former colonial governor and a former colony. I really cannot imagine why this kind of "the former white master knows best" mentality is even acceptable in today's politically correct world.

    Our city's politics is ridiculous, and therefore may be a few wrongs will make one right. I would start with jailing Junius Ho. I am just kidding!

    (HK Edition 09/26/2017 page8)

    Today's Top News

    Editor's picks

    Most Viewed

    Top
    BACK TO THE TOP
    English
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    中文字幕欧美在线| 无码任你躁久久久久久| 最新中文字幕av无码专区| 国内精品无码一区二区三区| 日本中文字幕一区二区有码在线| 亚洲VA中文字幕无码毛片| 中文字幕免费在线观看| 亚洲AV永久无码天堂影院| 人妻丰满熟妇av无码区不卡| 亚洲乱码中文字幕手机在线| 亚洲中文字幕无码久久综合网| 国产午夜无码视频在线观看| 亚洲精品无码久久久久sm| 最近2019中文字幕免费直播| 亚洲中文字幕无码中文字在线| 国产日韩精品中文字无码| 亚洲av中文无码乱人伦在线播放| 最好看最新的中文字幕免费| 中文字幕AV影片在线手机播放| 国产精品久久久久无码av| 无码成人一区二区| 亚洲AV综合色区无码一区爱AV | 人妻少妇伦在线无码专区视频| 国精品无码一区二区三区在线蜜臀| 亚洲欧美日韩中文字幕在线不卡 | 亚洲高清无码在线观看| 大学生无码视频在线观看| 国产精品无码成人午夜电影| 亚洲av日韩av无码| 无码人妻精品中文字幕| 无码无遮挡又大又爽又黄的视频| 在人线AV无码免费高潮喷水| 国产AⅤ无码专区亚洲AV| 伊人久久综合精品无码AV专区| 八戒理论片午影院无码爱恋| 亚洲中文字幕无码久久2017| av无码人妻一区二区三区牛牛| 无码人妻一区二区三区在线| 人禽无码视频在线观看| 国产精品无码久久久久久| 久久久久亚洲AV无码专区桃色 |