Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
    World
    Home / World / Americas

    3M to pay $850 million to settle disposal lawsuit

    China Daily | Updated: 2018-02-22 08:55
    Share
    Share - WeChat

    MINNEAPOLIS - 3M Co has agreed to pay the state of Minnesota $850 million to settle a major case alleging the manufacturer damaged natural resources and contaminated groundwater by disposing of chemicals over decades, Minnesota's attorney general announced on Tuesday.

    The state was seeking $5 billion from Maplewood, Minnesota-based 3M in a case that focused on the company's disposal of chemicals once used to make Scotchgard fabric protector and other products. The lawsuit, filed in 2010, alleged 3M damaged Minnesota's natural resources, including more than 100 miles of the Mississippi River. The state also said the chemicals contaminated drinking water, harmed wildlife and posed a threat to human health.

    The company denies it did anything wrong, insisting it was acting legally at the time. The settlement did not require an admission of liability, Attorney General Lori Swanson said.

    "We're pleased with the settlement. We think the settlement will help solve a problem in Minnesota. It's been a problem that has been a long time in the making for many decades," Swanson said. "These chemicals, as I mentioned, were put into the ground. And we are very hopeful the settlement can help fix that."

    The settlement was announced Tuesday after jury selection was halted as the trial was set to begin. Swanson said she believes it is the largest environmental case in state history.

    Swanson said 3M will pay the state in one lump sum within the next 15 days. It will go into a fund dedicated to projects that will clean up and safeguard drinking water in the eastern suburbs of St. Paul. Details on how the money will be used are still being worked out, but it could go to help homeowners with contaminated wells, or help municipalities with sustainable drinking water and treatment plans.

    Funding would also go toward habitat restoration and recreation such as fishing piers, trails or wetlands.

    The lawsuit was centered on 3M's disposal of perfluorochemicals, or PFCs, and their compounds. The company began producing PFCs in the 1950s and legally disposed of them in landfills for decades. Along with Scotchgard, the chemicals were used in fire retardants, paints, nonstick cookware and other products.

    The company stopped making PFCs in 2002 after negotiating with the Environmental Protection Agency. But in 2004, trace amounts of the chemicals were found in groundwater at 3M dumping sites east of St. Paul.

    The state and 3M reached a deal three years later requiring the company to spend millions to clean up landfills and provide clean drinking water to affected communities.

    But Minnesota sued in 2010, alleging 3M researched PFCs and knew the chemicals were getting into the environment and posing a threat to human health.

    In a statement Tuesday, 3M senior vice president of research and development John Banovetz said the company is proud of its record of environmental stewardship and does not believe there is a PFC-related health issue.

    Since the Minnesota lawsuit was filed in 2010, concerns over PFCs have grown. The Star Tribune reported that in 2016, the EPA drastically reduced the recommended maximum levels of PFC concentrations for drinking water. As a result, about 15 million people learned their drinking water wasn't considered safe for long-term consumption.

    The Star Tribune reported that the EPA's advisory sent communities nationwide scrambling to install technology to treat water. Some of those communities have sued, and some are investigating to determine who or what produced the PFCs in their water, and what, if any, long-term effects they might face due to continued exposure.

    Associated Press

    Most Viewed in 24 Hours
    Top
    BACK TO THE TOP
    English
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    久久久久成人精品无码中文字幕| 精品无码人妻一区二区三区不卡| 欧美一级一区二区中文字幕| 日韩成人无码中文字幕 | 最近免费字幕中文大全视频| 欧美日韩中文字幕2020| 欧美日韩亚洲中文字幕二区| 亚洲av无码成人精品国产| 日本免费在线中文字幕| 无码免费又爽又高潮喷水的视频| 无码人妻精品一区二区三区99仓本 | 国产亚洲精品a在线无码| 影院无码人妻精品一区二区| 精品久久久久久无码中文野结衣| 亚洲av无码国产精品色在线看不卡| 日韩免费人妻AV无码专区蜜桃| 无码欧精品亚洲日韩一区夜夜嗨| 人妻少妇偷人精品无码| 亚洲中文字幕无码久久2017| 毛片免费全部无码播放| 精品无码人妻一区二区免费蜜桃 | 日韩va中文字幕无码电影| 办公室丝袜激情无码播放| 无码毛片一区二区三区视频免费播放| 亚洲av成人无码久久精品| 亚洲精品无码AV人在线播放| 中文字幕在线亚洲精品| 一区二区三区人妻无码| 无码国产精品一区二区免费式影视| 一级片无码中文字幕乱伦| 无码少妇一区二区浪潮av| 黑人无码精品又粗又大又长| 无码高清不卡| 亚洲?V无码成人精品区日韩| 精品无码人妻久久久久久| 亚洲 无码 在线 专区| 最新中文字幕AV无码不卡| 中文字幕本一道先锋影音| 精品久久久无码中文字幕天天| 中文字幕在线观看亚洲| 亚洲中文字幕无码专区|