Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
    Opinion
    Home / Opinion / From the Readers

    Myanmar earthquake rescue: China's swift response and America's lackluster performance

    By Lin Zi | chinadaily.com.cn | Updated: 2025-04-16 14:20
    Share
    Share - WeChat
    Children are seen at a temporary shelter for quake-affected people in Mandalay, Myanmar, April 3, 2025. [Photo/Xinhua]

    On March 28, Myanmar was struck by a magnitude 7.9 earthquake, causing significant damage and loss of life. The disaster prompted countries and international organizations to provide aid, including supplies and rescue teams to support local relief efforts.

    "Benevolence and good neighborliness are the treasures of a nation." As a friendly neighbor connected by shared mountains and rivers, China closely monitored the situation in Myanmar and immediately provided assistance tailored to the country's needs.

    The Chinese government promptly allocated 100 million yuan in emergency humanitarian aid. U Tin Maung Swe, Myanmar's ambassador to China, expressed that China's rapid response and the leaders' heartfelt sympathy "made the people of Myanmar truly feel the profound 'Paukphaw' (fraternal) friendship between our two nations, which we will forever cherish."

    Rescue operations are a race against time, with the "golden 72 hours" critical for saving lives. Just 18 hours after the quake, at 7 am on March 29, a rescue team from Yunnan province arrived in Myanmar — this was the first international team to reach the country. Equipped with life-detection equipment and other advanced tools, the 37-member team rushed to the hard-hit city of Naypyidaw and successfully rescued the first survivor in the early hours of March 30.

    By the evening of March 30, just 60 hours after the earthquake, the Chinese government had deployed four official rescue teams consisting of 288 personnel to Myanmar, including teams from the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Beyond government efforts, over 10 civilian rescue teams from Zhejiang, Shenzhen, Shanghai, Hunan, and other regions in China arrived, showcasing the strong bond between the two nations.

    Over the next few days, Chinese rescue teams saved nine survivors. Relief supplies, including mosquito nets, tents, blankets, drinking water, instant food, and first aid kits, were delivered in multiple batches by April 11, addressing the immediate needs of affected communities. Donations from the Chinese Red Cross, enterprises, and the public further demonstrated the warm people-to-people bond between China and Myanmar. Myanmar's State Administration Council Chairman Min Aung Hlaing visited Chinese rescue teams' camp twice, expressing gratitude and emphasizing that their arrival embodied the deep "Paukphaw" friendship.

    In contrast, the US response has been notably slow. Prior to the earthquake, the US Agency for International Development's (USAID) Bureau of Humanitarian Assistance had been downsized, and only 78 staff members were available for disaster relief. Two days after the quake, USAID terminated the contracts of 900 employees. Reports revealed that 14 of the 15 USAID officials in Myanmar tasked with overseeing relief funds had been placed on indefinite leave in February, and three temporary workers were abruptly fired while on duty, leaving the situation in disarray. Ten days after the disaster, the US Disaster Assistance Response Team (DART) remained conspicuously absent from the disaster zone. The BBC criticized the US for its "inability to deliver a meaningful response."

    The US Embassy in Myanmar announced a meager $2 million in aid on March 30 — two days after the quake-claiming a "USAID emergency response team is deploying to Myanmar." This belated and insufficient aid disappointed those who expected more from America's vaunted humanitarian efforts. On April 3, the US, alongside Japan, India and Australia, issued a joint statement under the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (Quad), "pledging" over $20 million in supplies. Yet the Quad, established in 2004 to address the Indian Ocean tsunami, has since devolved into a US-led bloc aimed at containing China, with international observers doubting its ability to focus on disaster relief. Adding insult to injury, amid Donald Trump's tariff war, Myanmar-already reeling from the earthquake — was hit with a 44 percent tariff hike, further exacerbating the country's plight.

    Facing reporters on April 4, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio defended the slow response, stating "Our resources are not unlimited," while urging China to "take the lead." The New York University School of Law's Just Security called America's absence in Myanmar's early response a "moral and strategic failure," while The New York Times blamed Washington's dysfunction for the delay, noting the US, "once a foreign aid leader, has been sluggish to act."

    As a long-time observer of US affairs, I might offer a reluctant defense: America's passivity likely stems from systemic indifference, not malice toward Myanmar. This mirrors its lackluster responses to Hurricane Helene in Florida and Georgia, and the January 2025 wildfires in Malibu and Los Angeles. When even its own citizens receive tepid support, is anyone surprised by its dismissive attitude toward foreign crises?

    Reflecting on the Myanmar earthquake, we are reminded of humanity's fragility in the face of nature. No country, nation, or individual is immune to disasters; we are all intertwined in a shared destiny. China's selfless aid embodies respect for life, a tradition of unity, and a great power's commitment to aligning its future with humanity's. In contrast, the US has prioritized "America First", withdrawing from international bodies, shirking responsibilities, and pursuing "decoupling" and "small yards with high walls" in economic-actions that betray the role of a true global leader.

    China's rapid, effective response and America's slow, inadequate effort highlight stark contrasts between the two nations and their visions for humanity's future. As all walks of life in Myanmar have noted, "China's efficient rescue demonstrates its national strength and its responsibility as a great power." The US, mired in chaos, can only disappoint other countries. Perhaps this will become the "new normal."

    The author is a PhD student at Peking University's Institute of Area Studies.

    The views don't necessarily reflect those of China Daily.

    If you have a specific expertise, or would like to share your thought about our stories, then send us your writings at opinion@chinadaily.com.cn, and comment@chinadaily.com.cn.

    Most Viewed in 24 Hours
    Top
    BACK TO THE TOP
    English
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    亚洲无码在线播放| 乱人伦中文视频高清视频| 中文字幕无码毛片免费看| 在线精品无码字幕无码AV| 亚洲精品无码专区久久同性男| 无码中文字幕日韩专区| 精品久久久久久无码专区| 中文字幕久久亚洲一区| 欧美日韩中文国产一区发布| 亚洲A∨无码无在线观看| 色综合久久综合中文综合网| 国产成人AV无码精品| 亚洲av永久无码精品国产精品| 中文字幕在线视频网| 中文无码一区二区不卡αv| 麻豆亚洲AV永久无码精品久久| 一区二区三区在线观看中文字幕 | 亚洲欧美日韩中文字幕一区二区三区| 久久久久久无码国产精品中文字幕| 一本本月无码-| 人妻丰满av无码中文字幕| 无码AV一区二区三区无码| 日韩精品无码熟人妻视频| 最近2018中文字幕在线高清下载| 中文字幕无码成人免费视频| 精品无码人妻久久久久久| 亚洲A∨无码无在线观看| 亚洲av日韩av无码| 无码人妻黑人中文字幕| 亚洲VA中文字幕不卡无码| 亚洲人成无码网站在线观看 | 中文字幕在线看视频一区二区三区| 中文字幕无码精品亚洲资源网久久| 无码人妻丰满熟妇区五十路| 国产羞羞的视频在线观看 国产一级无码视频在线| 亚洲av福利无码无一区二区| 国产麻豆天美果冻无码视频| 人妻中文无码久热丝袜| 国产台湾无码AV片在线观看| 久久男人Av资源网站无码软件| 亚洲自偷自偷偷色无码中文|