Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
    Opinion
    Home / Opinion / Global Lens

    A tale of two intellectual paradigms

    By Tariq H. Malik | CHINA DAILY | Updated: 2025-07-01 07:25
    Share
    Share - WeChat
    A guest shakes hands with a humanoid robot at the ongoing fourth China-CEEC Expo in Ningbo, East China's Zhejiang province. ZHANG WEI/CHINA DAILY

    People of Indian origin have excelled in the role of executives, while those of Chinese origin have outshone others as visionaries. In recent decades, Indian professionals have reached the pinnacle of leadership in multinational corporations. From Microsoft to Google and IBM, these "administrators" symbolize India's rising profile in global corporations' boardrooms.

    Chinese visionaries, on the other hand, have created Alibaba, Huawei, BYD, Byte-Dance (TikTok), and Tencent (WeChat). From high-speed railway and other technological infrastructure, and from quark to quantum physics, Chinese visionaries have reached many a milestone at home.

    This raises a puzzling question: Why have the Indian managers flourished abroad, but not at home, and why do visionaries achieve far greater success at home than abroad?

    This contrast is not just about where success is achieved but the form it takes. That India excels in producing global managers could be traced back to its colonial past where "viceroys" served the sovereigns of Great Britain. Visionaries foster institutional entrepreneurs and build structures from the ground up.

    The rise of Indian executives in multinational corporations is often attributed to their talent and education. But underlying this is a civilizational script shaped by colonial governance. India's administrative class, once trained to serve imperial institutions, passed on a legacy of institutional conformity, managerial competence and comfort with hierarchical structures. Many Indian professionals today mirror these qualities, excelling in environments that reward precision, discipline and alignment with shareholder interests.

    This heritage is reinforced by India's elite educational institutions, which emphasize problem-solving, data analysis and technical rigor. These institutions offer a meritocratic but narrow pipeline into global corporate and academic ecosystems, particularly in the science and engineering fields.

    Academics have their own trajectories. Scholars of Indian origin dominate in Western universities, taking up managerial and academic roles.

    Yet hardly can we pinpoint a dominant theoretical framework proposed by Indian executives at home or abroad, except for a few dots here and there. This mirrors their corporate acumen both as managers of companies and managers of journals: capable stewards of institutional performance, but not necessarily institutional vision.

    The trajectory of the Chinese visionaries offers a striking contrast. While fewer Chinese professionals have reached the top of Western institutions or corporations, many have achieved prominence at home by building institutions from within. This is particularly evident in the technology, education, and infrastructure sectors, where the visionaries have developed competitive alternatives to Western models. Visionaries have begun to globalize institutions such as the Belt and Road Initiative.

    This success stems from an ethos of institutional entrepreneurship. Visionary professionals are often embedded in long-term planning ecosystems, public-private partnerships, and government-supported innovation clusters. Their influence is not always individually visible, but collectively transformative.

    This domestically focused model relies less on individual charisma and more on systemic coordination. It also reflects a different relationship to narratives and communication. Chinese professionals tend to operate "below the narrative line", embracing modesty, indirect persuasion, and institutional continuity over personal acclaim. Their narratives are often embedded in State-driven or organizational scripts rather than personal branding.

    In line with its cultural traditions, rooted in rhetorical diversity, debate and negotiation, India has produced professionals who are adept at storytelling, framing and strategic persuasion about things that do not exist. These narrative skills are essential in executive leadership, academia, and diplomacy, where success often hinges on how ideas are presented, not just their content and material value.

    For Chinese visionaries, the narrative has a different scope of stakeholders — inclusivity, social well-being, and people above capital. The visionaries' rhetorical fluency reflects their subtler communication style. Where a viceroy often presents expansive visions and can sell a future that does not exist, the visionary presents the achievements of the past.

    The scope of a visionary's audience is the domestic institutional strength, minimization of the overextended gap between narratives and material realities. These visionaries have helped build world-class infrastructure and promoted equitable education, meaning the visionaries' narrative advantage has translated into domestic transformation at scale, which is missing among the Indian executives.

    The contrast between India's global executives and China's domestic visionaries is not about cultural superiority or developmental speed, but about cultivational versus foundational skills; transformational versus institutional acumen; structural versus generational wisdom. It is about the disposition of hidden persuaders — the habits of thought. One excels in operating within the principal or shareholders' system; the other operates in building a homegrown framework of systems.

    This divergence raises a larger question for emerging economies: should the goal be to master existing institutions in distant lands or to author new ones in the proximity of one's home? Can a nation create leaders who are both effective stewards and generative builders?

    As the world confronts institutional voids in climate governance, healthcare equity, and digital regulation, success will require more than operational competence. It will demand imagination, risk-taking, and the ability to build institutions that do not yet exist. That is the work of visionaries.

    The author is a professor of innovation studies at Liaoning University.

    The views don't necessarily reflect those of China Daily.

    If you have a specific expertise, or would like to share your thought about our stories, then send us your writings at opinion@chinadaily.com.cn, and comment@chinadaily.com.cn.

    Most Viewed in 24 Hours
    Top
    BACK TO THE TOP
    English
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    中文字幕人妻无码系列第三区| 无码av最新无码av专区| 午夜不卡久久精品无码免费| 亚洲VA中文字幕无码毛片| 日韩精品无码久久久久久| 久久中文字幕无码专区| 久久中文精品无码中文字幕| 亚洲va无码手机在线电影| 欧美日韩不卡一区二区三区中文字| 午夜无码一区二区三区在线观看| 日韩国产成人无码av毛片| 中文人妻无码一区二区三区| 日韩精品一区二三区中文| 无码人妻黑人中文字幕| 亚洲中文字幕无码爆乳av中文| 久久AV高清无码| 久久久久久亚洲AV无码专区| 无码人妻一区二区三区免费看| 日韩AV高清无码| 人妻丰满熟妇AV无码区HD| 中文字幕精品一区| 亚洲日韩在线中文字幕综合 | 国产精品无码无卡在线播放| 亚洲国产综合无码一区| 久久久久av无码免费网| 寂寞少妇做spa按摩无码| 精选观看中文字幕高清无码| 精品久久久久久久久久中文字幕| 亚洲A∨无码无在线观看| 日本乱人伦中文字幕网站| 最近中文字幕免费mv在线视频| 日韩电影免费在线观看中文字幕| 美丽姑娘免费观看在线观看中文版| 中文字幕Av一区乱码| 国产日韩精品中文字无码| 欧美日本中文字幕| 中文字幕精品视频在线| 亚洲V无码一区二区三区四区观看 亚洲爆乳精品无码一区二区三区 亚洲爆乳无码一区二区三区 | 日韩欧国产精品一区综合无码| 潮喷无码正在播放| 天天看高清无码一区二区三区|