久久久无码人妻精品无码_6080YYY午夜理论片中无码_性无码专区_无码人妻品一区二区三区精99

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Chinese Perspectives

What use are the humanities in the age of AI?

By Chen Ming | China Daily | Updated: 2025-11-08 09:02
Share
Share - WeChat

Figurines with computers and smartphones are seen in front of the words "Artificial Intelligence AI" in this illustration. [Photo/Agencies]

What use are the humanities? That blunt question has ricocheted across social media in recent years, especially since ChatGPT and DeepSeek vaulted large language models into the popular imagination. Students are flocking to engineering — above all to the new, AI-adjacent disciplines — while mathematics enjoys renewed prestige for its links to finance. Medicine keeps its steady draw because lives are at stake. And the humanities? Literature drifts to the margins, history quietly recedes, philosophy keeps its ascetic posture, law's popularity slips, and even journalism — once a lively, public-facing craft — has been riven by controversy. If not for civil-service exams or the lure of a stable post, many humanities majors might never have attracted so many applicants in the first place.

This is not merely an anecdote. Institutional choices mirror the mood. In autumn 2024, Harvard's undergraduate college dropped at least 30 courses across more than 20 departments — most of them in the arts and humanities. And in 2025, Fudan University sharply reduced its humanities intake to around 20 percent; the university president cited shrinking applicant pools and perceived societal demand. From public attitudes to job listings to curricular planning, the humanities are sliding.

But disciplinary fashions wax and wane. Over the past two centuries, scientific modernity has steadily siphoned off the humanities' explanatory authority. Big language models now step on the accelerator: they can produce fluent prose, mimic styles and simulate argument with astonishing fluency. If the humanities are reduced to wordplay and stylistic flourishes, how can they possibly compete with machines that generate copy at near-zero marginal cost?

The answer begins by recognizing that different fields have different meta-tasks. Engineering is goal-directed: it shapes the physical world to achieve specified ends, and its virtue lies in efficiently realizing objectives. The natural sciences seek to translate the messy world into numbers, to map phenomena to mathematical laws so that complexity becomes tractable and predictable. The humanities have a distinct meta-task of their own: they produce meaning.

Meaning-production is not a luxury; for Homo sapiens it is structural. We do not live by calculations alone. Science can tell us how to travel to Mars; engineering can build the rocket. But only the humanities can help us decide where we should go, what kinds of futures are worth pursuing, and how to live while we are on the journey. Through concepts, critique, narrative and moral imagination, the humanities make sense of ends, not merely means.

Why, then, is the appetite for meaning so diminished? One reason is the triumph of quantification. Modern science has converted almost every measurable quality into numbers — color becomes wavelength, sound becomes frequency, smell becomes molecular concentration. When value is reduced to cash, and success to pay packets, the question "Why?" is too often eclipsed by "How much?" The relentless logic of the market and the compression of attention into ever-shorter digital moments have produced a culture of the immediate, the ephemeral and the transactional.

Contemporary life is dominated by pointillist time: a series of discrete, clickable instants. Short dramas, livestream commerce, viral clips — none of these invite retrospective reflection or patient continuity. In such a climate, long narratives — ethical, historical, philosophical — lose purchase. Young people, anxious about jobs and livelihoods, are understandably pragmatic. If a degree does not make the rent, what good is it? The result is a collective shrinkage of horizons: less appetite for big stories, fewer investments in the capacities that sustain them.

The social cost is not just aesthetic. When we stop supplying the memory, frameworks and vocabularies for interpreting experience, existential malaise follows. Depression, anxiety and a host of "time-disordered" maladies are part of our present landscape. People still yearn for things that outlast a payday: dignity, purpose, solidarity, transcendence. The humanities supply those things — or at least the tools to discover them.

What about AI? Won't large language models simply manufacture meaning at scale? They can mimic sentiment, assemble convincing narratives and synthesize arguments. But their core architecture remains a probabilistic token predictor. It forecasts the next most likely word given prior context. That is extraordinary, but it is not the same as having a lived body, a history of embodied perception, or a moral imagination forged in communities over centuries. Machines do not experience redness, grief, shame or awe. They do not possess what philosophers call intentionality — the directedness of minds toward meanings. They simulate the surface features of meaning; they do not anchor them in the moral and sensory continua that make meanings endure.

This is not to romanticize the humanities as immune to change. Far from it. The humanities must be rigorous, public-minded and exacting: surgically attentive critique, panoramic perspective, crystalline logic, a keen ear for language and a capacity to produce new concepts that matter. In the age of algorithmic abundance, humanists must reassert the craft of meaning-making: translating complexity into intelligible narratives, defending the public sphere against the flattening of values, and constructing ethical frameworks that guide technological deployment.

We possess a rare, fragile gift: a species-wide capacity to ask why, to make sacrifices for ideals beyond selfish calculation, to preserve collective memory. Let us not squander it on the altar of novelty, nor outsource it to machinery that cannot shoulder our moral inheritance. Reinvest in the humanities not as an indulgence but as an urgent social technology: the only discipline equipped to remind us why certain futures are worth choosing.

So when the next student asks, "What use are the humanities?" we should answer plainly: they are the instruments by which we refuse to be reduced to mere processors of data and consumers of convenience. They give us reasons to remain human.

The author is a lecturer at the School of Journalism and Communication, Wuhan University, as well as a host and debater.

The views don't necessarily represent those of China Daily.

If you have a specific expertise, or would like to share your thought about our stories, then send us your writings at opinion@chinadaily.com.cn, and comment@chinadaily.com.cn.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
久久久无码人妻精品无码_6080YYY午夜理论片中无码_性无码专区_无码人妻品一区二区三区精99

    制服丝袜综合网| 99热亚洲精品| av天堂永久资源网| 三级黄色片播放| 日本女优爱爱视频| 久久久性生活视频| 91社在线播放| 日韩一区二区三区久久| 无码专区aaaaaa免费视频| 亚洲综合伊人久久| 久草综合在线观看| 131美女爱做视频| 在线观看av的网址| 五月天激情播播| 亚洲中文字幕久久精品无码喷水| 今天免费高清在线观看国语| 亚洲欧美日韩三级| 国产三级日本三级在线播放| 免费国产a级片| 日韩一区二区高清视频| 免费看av软件| www.cao超碰| 一区二区三区网址| 国产自偷自偷免费一区| av动漫在线观看| 国产v片免费观看| 一本久道高清无码视频| 成人黄色片免费| 91视频成人免费| 91免费视频黄| 大地资源第二页在线观看高清版| 五月婷婷之婷婷| 伊人国产在线视频| 日日噜噜夜夜狠狠| 午夜免费高清视频| 欧美三级理论片| 午夜激情福利在线| 日本人视频jizz页码69| 宅男噜噜噜66国产免费观看| 男女视频一区二区三区| 久久九九国产视频| 日本www.色| 向日葵污视频在线观看| www.这里只有精品| 天天操狠狠操夜夜操| 亚洲制服中文字幕| 天天干天天色天天爽| 三级在线免费观看| 蜜臀精品一区二区| 黄色一级在线视频| 日本三级免费观看| 久草综合在线观看| xxww在线观看| 熟妇熟女乱妇乱女网站| 97久久国产亚洲精品超碰热| 日韩日韩日韩日韩日韩| 无码播放一区二区三区| 国产又黄又大又粗视频| 国产成人无码一二三区视频| 污视频免费在线观看网站| 天天操狠狠操夜夜操| 欧美一级免费在线观看| 97免费视频观看| 免费日韩视频在线观看| 日本xxxx黄色| dy888午夜| 毛片在线播放视频| 日本成人在线免费视频| 九色porny自拍| 视频一区二区视频| 国产二区视频在线| 婷婷激情四射五月天| 欧美精品色视频| 丁香六月激情婷婷| 成人免费无码av| 强伦女教师2:伦理在线观看| 免费av手机在线观看| 久草福利视频在线| 国产美女视频免费看| japanese在线播放| 成年人视频在线免费| 麻豆中文字幕在线观看| 国产免费黄色小视频| 天堂网在线免费观看| 少妇一晚三次一区二区三区| www.亚洲天堂网| 老司机av福利| 欧美污视频网站| 精品日韩在线播放| 国产美女三级视频| 只有这里有精品| 日韩无套无码精品| 狠狠精品干练久久久无码中文字幕 | 韩国无码av片在线观看网站| 啊啊啊一区二区| www.亚洲自拍| 日韩av资源在线| 裸体裸乳免费看| 一本久道综合色婷婷五月| 永久免费在线看片视频| 无码人妻丰满熟妇区五十路百度| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃| 日韩激情免费视频| 熟女视频一区二区三区| aaaaaa亚洲| 国产尤物av一区二区三区| 国产视频手机在线播放| 国产九色porny| 午夜啪啪免费视频| 欧美性猛交久久久乱大交小说 | 一本久道综合色婷婷五月| 性做爰过程免费播放| 激情婷婷综合网| 精品久久久无码人妻字幂| www.夜夜爽| aaaaaa亚洲| 成人一区二区免费视频| 中国老女人av| 久国产精品视频| 992kp快乐看片永久免费网址| 日韩av在线播放不卡| 超碰91在线播放| 一本色道久久亚洲综合精品蜜桃| 欧美二区在线视频| 91成人综合网| 日本成人性视频| 一起操在线视频| 天天碰免费视频| 37pao成人国产永久免费视频| 大荫蒂性生交片| 狠狠精品干练久久久无码中文字幕| 中文字幕中文在线| 15—17女人毛片| 香蕉视频网站入口| 亚洲国产精品毛片av不卡在线| 日韩国产欧美亚洲| 欧美一级片免费播放| 国产一区二区三区在线免费| 青少年xxxxx性开放hg| 激情在线观看视频| 中日韩av在线播放| 九九热精品在线播放| 亚洲老女人av| xxx国产在线观看| 成年网站在线播放| 日韩一区二区三区不卡视频| 少妇一级淫免费放| 超碰超碰在线观看| 欧美日韩一区二区三区69堂| 一区二区成人网| 欧美第一页浮力影院| 日本人视频jizz页码69| 少妇一级淫免费放| 精品久久久99| 欧洲美女亚洲激情| 视频一区二区视频| 69精品丰满人妻无码视频a片| 91看片淫黄大片91| 国产小视频免费| 人妻无码久久一区二区三区免费| 国产二区视频在线| 91黄色小网站| 亚洲 欧美 另类人妖| 成人日韩在线视频| 三年中文高清在线观看第6集| 国产一区一区三区| 日韩一级片免费视频| 久久久999免费视频| 日韩一级免费在线观看| 欧美wwwwwww| www亚洲国产| 97在线国产视频| 丰满爆乳一区二区三区| 久久久久久久少妇| 亚洲18在线看污www麻豆 | aa在线免费观看| 国产超碰在线播放| 人人爽人人爽av| 国产乱子伦精品视频| 日韩a∨精品日韩在线观看| 国产精品人人妻人人爽人人牛| 91小视频网站| 亚洲啊啊啊啊啊| 国产日韩一区二区在线| 五月激情五月婷婷| 黄色成人在线免费观看| 爱福利视频一区二区| 色噜噜狠狠一区二区三区狼国成人| 9l视频自拍9l视频自拍| 男人操女人逼免费视频| 最新天堂在线视频| 国产成人永久免费视频| 少妇性l交大片| 国产精品久久成人免费观看| www.日本在线播放| 中文字幕亚洲乱码| 欧美午夜小视频| 欧美成年人视频在线观看| 女同性恋一区二区| 日韩欧美xxxx|