chinadaily.com.cn
    left corner left corner
    China Daily Website

    Sany seeks wind-farm hearing

    Updated: 2012-11-30 02:27
    By WEI TIAN in Beijing, ZHANG YUWEI in New York and CAI CHUNYING in Washington ( China Daily)

    Decision to bar deals violated firm's rights, lawyers argue

    Ralls Corp, owned by executives of Chinese industrial giant Sany Group Co Ltd, has asked a federal judge in Washington to hear its case against US President Barack Obama's decision to scrap the purchase of four wind-farm projects near a US navy facility in Oregon.

    But some experts say the chances of Sany winning the case against Obama are slim.

    Lawyers for Delaware-based Ralls told US District Judge Amy Berman Jackson at a two-hour hearing on Wednesday that the company's rights were violated by the Sept 28 decision to bar the wind-farm deals due to an unspecified national security risk. The company also argues that it has not been given a chance to address the Obama administration's concerns.

    Ralls argued that Obama's move could cost the company at least the $20 million it has spent on design and construction since acquiring the Oregon sites.

    "Bringing this to the court is really the last thing we want to do, as we all know going to court is a big deal in any country, either in China or the United States," Wu Jialiang, a Sany deputy general manager and co-owner of Ralls, told China Daily after the hearing.

    "Had we been given fair treatment and the opportunity to discuss this decision, we wouldn't have come this far," he said.

    Tim Cullen, partner with US law firm Jones Day, who specializes in global trade disputes, said the case is "virtually unprecedented, because Sany and Ralls are challenging both the action of the CFIUS (Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States) and discretion of the president".

    He said the government may argue that the judge should not become involved because it is a matter of national security.

    The case was "appealing" as it showed strong needs for a review, but the chances for it proceeding still hinged on presidential discretion, Cullen said.

    Many legal commentators and academics think the US government has a favorable chance in the case.

    Clif Burns, a lawyer with Washington firm Bryan Cave LLP who specializes in export controls and economic sanctions, said: "The Exon-Florio amendment specifically exempts presidential decisions such as this from judicial review, so Ralls' lawsuit has virtually no chance of being successful."

    He was referring to a federal law enacted in 1988 that provides for scrutiny of foreign investments.

    Burns said: "I don't think that Obama's decision to block (the wind-farm deals) will have much effect on future Chinese investment in the US because of the unique security concerns posed by this investment."

    But Cullen said the case could have various consequences, one being that the committee on foreign investment may have to adopt more regular procedures and more transparency in dealing with such cases.

    Cullen also said China has been a promising source of capital for investment worldwide. Although there have been incidences where investment has stopped, this was only on a small scale, and the US market would eventually get used to Chinese investment.

    He compared the trend to the expansion of Japanese investors from the 1980s onwards. "There was a lot of concern over the dramatically increasing Japanese share of the car market, but over a period of time people just get used to the ideas that they would make Hondas and Toyotas and this is perfectly good for the country.

    "The aggressive adaptation by China and Chinese enterprises to the rule of law is one of the greatest legal stories of my career," Cullen said.

    Ann Lee, a New York University economics professor, said the case is not likely to have an impact on other Chinese investments, especially smaller transactions that do not involve technology or natural resources.

    "The case will be a near impossibility to win, since rarely do private interests have the resources or political capital to go against a government which makes all the rules," Lee said.

    "But it will be a good way for the Chinese to get experience in working the US legal system, even if they lose."

    Contact the writers at weitian@chinadaily.com.cn and yuweizhang@chinadailyusa.com

    8.03K
     
    ...
    ...
    ...
    在线观看免费无码专区| 亚洲AV无码专区日韩| 亚洲精品国产日韩无码AV永久免费网| 日韩三级中文字幕| 四虎成人精品国产永久免费无码| 中文有无人妻vs无码人妻激烈| 中文字幕一区二区人妻| 无码精品国产VA在线观看DVD| 中文字幕精品一区影音先锋| 天堂无码在线观看| 无码精品人妻一区二区三区人妻斩 | 亚洲AV无码久久精品成人 | 欧美日韩中文国产va另类电影| 国产免费无码一区二区| 97无码人妻福利免费公开在线视频| 久久精品中文无码资源站| 毛片一区二区三区无码| 国产精品无码av在线播放| 亚洲精品无码国产| 中文字幕在线无码一区| 曰韩中文字幕在线中文字幕三级有码 | 熟妇人妻无码中文字幕| 国产精品毛片无码| 久久久久亚洲精品无码蜜桃| 亚洲国产精品无码专区在线观看| 亚洲天堂2017无码中文| 亚洲va中文字幕无码| 日本中文字幕中出在线| 色综合中文综合网| 人妻少妇久久中文字幕一区二区 | 久久无码人妻一区二区三区| 亚洲爆乳无码专区| 亚洲无码在线播放| 影音先锋中文无码一区| 中文成人久久久久影院免费观看| 亚洲日韩AV一区二区三区中文| 中文字幕高清在线| 在线欧美天码中文字幕| 国产成人精品无码一区二区三区| 中文字幕人妻无码一区二区三区| 中国无码人妻丰满熟妇啪啪软件 |