chinadaily.com.cn
    left corner left corner
    China Daily Website

    NY Times: The inconvenient truth behind Diaoyu Islands

    Updated: 2012-10-12 19:13
    ( cn.nytimes.com)

    BEIJING - The New York Times has published an article of Han-Yi Shaw, a scholar from China's Taiwan, titled "The Inconvenient Truth Behind the Diaoyu Islands." Follwoing is the main content:

    Japan's recent purchase of the Diaoyu Islands has predictably reignited tensions amongst Chinese mainland, Taiwan, and Japan. Three months ago, when Niwa Uichiro, the Japanese ambassador to China, warned that Japan's purchase of the islands could spark an "extremely grave crisis" between China and Japan, Tokyo Governor Ishihara Shintaro slammed Niwa as an unqualified ambassador, who "needs to learn more about the history of his own country".

    Ambassador Niwa was forced to apologize for his remarks and was recently replaced. But what is most alarming amid these developments is that despite Japan's democratic and pluralist society, rising nationalist sentiments are sidelining moderate views and preventing rational dialogue.

    The Japanese government maintains that the Diaoyu Islands are Japanese territory under international law and historical point of view and has repeatedly insisted that no dispute exists. Despite that the rest of the world sees a major dispute, the Japanese government continues to evade important historical facts behind its unlawful incorporation of the islands in 1895.

    Specifically, the Japanese government asserts, "From 1885 on, our government conducted on-site surveys time and again, which confirmed that the islands were uninhabited and there were no signs of control by the Qing Empire."

    My research of over 40 official Meiji period documents unearthed from the Japanese National Archives, Diplomatic Records Office, and National Institute for Defense Studies Library clearly demonstrates that the Meiji government acknowledged Chinese ownership of the islands back in 1885.

    Following the first on-site survey, in 1885, the Japanese foreign minister wrote, "Chinese newspapers have been reporting rumors of our intention of occupying islands belonging to China located next to Taiwan. At this time, if we were to publicly place national markers, this must necessarily invite China's suspicion. "

    In November 1885, the Okinawa governor confirmed "since this matter is not unrelated to China, if problems do arise I would be in grave repentance for my responsibility".

    "Surveys of the islands are incomplete" wrote the new Okinawa governor in January of 1892. He requested that a naval ship Kaimon be sent to survey the islands, but ultimately a combination of miscommunication and bad weather made it impossible for the survey to take place.

    "Ever since the islands were investigated by Okinawa police agencies back in 1885, there have been no subsequent field surveys conducted," the Okinawa governor wrote in 1894.

    After a number of Chinese defeats in the Sino-Japanese War, a report from Japan's Home Ministry said "this matter involved negotiations with China... but the situation today is greatly different from back then." The Meiji government, following a cabinet decision in early 1895, promptly incorporated the islands.

    Negotiations with China never took place and this decision was passed during the Sino-Japanese War. It was never made public.

    In his biography Koga Tatsushiro, the first Japanese citizen to lease the islands from the Meiji government, attributed Japan's possession of the islands to "the gallant military victory of our Imperial forces."

    Collectively, these official documents leave no doubt that the Meiji government did not base its occupation of the islands following "on-site surveys time and again," but instead annexed them as booty of war. This is the inconvenient truth that the Japanese government has conveniently evaded.

    Japan asserts that neither Chinese mainland nor Taiwan objected to U.S. administration after WWII. That's true, but what Japan does not mention is that neither Chinese mainland nor Taiwan were invited as signatories of the San Francisco Peace Treaty in 1951, from which the U.S. derived administrative rights.

    When Japan annexed the Diaoyu Islands in 1895, it detached them from Taiwan and placed them under Okinawa Prefecture. Moreover, the Japanese name "Senkaku Islands" itself was first introduced in 1900 by academic Kuroiwa Hisashi and adopted by the Japanese government thereafter. Half a century later when Japan returned Taiwan to Chinese mainland, both sides adopted the 1945 administrative arrangement of Taiwan, with the Chinese unaware that the uninhabited "Senkaku Islands" were in fact the former Diaoyu Islands. This explains the belated protest from Taiwan and Chinese mainland over U.S. administration of the islands after the war.

    The Japanese government frequently cites two documents as evidence that China did not consider the islands to be Chinese. The first is an official letter from a Chinese consul in Nagasaki dated May 20, 1920 that listed the islands as Japanese territory.

    Neither Chinese mainland nor Taiwan dispute that the Diaoyu Islands --- along with the entire island of Taiwan --- were formally under Japanese occupation at the time. However, per post-WW II arrangements, Japan was required to surrender territories obtained from aggression and revert them to their pre-1895 legal status.

    The second piece evidence is a Chinese map from 1958 that excludes the Diaoyu Islands from Chinese territory. But the Japanese government's partial unveiling leaves out important information from the map's colophon: "certain national boundaries are based on maps compiled prior to the Second Sino-Japanese War(1937-1945)."

    Qing period (1644-1911) records substantiate Chinese ownership of the Diaoyu Islands prior to 1895. Envoy documents indicate that the islands reside inside the "border that separates Chinese and foreign lands." And according to Taiwan gazetteers, "Diaoyu Island accommodates ten or more large ships" under the jurisdiction of Kavalan, Taiwan.

    The right to know is the bedrock of every democracy. The Japanese public deserves to know the other side of the story. It is the politicians who flame public sentiments under the name of national interests who pose the greatest risk, not the islands themselves.

    Han-Yi Shaw is a Research Fellow at the Research Center for International Legal Studies, National Chengchi University, in Taipei, Taiwan.

    8.03K
     
    ...
    ...
    ...
    无码精品人妻一区二区三区中| 精品人妻无码一区二区色欲产成人 | 天堂√中文最新版在线| 亚洲午夜福利AV一区二区无码| 亚洲精品无码专区在线播放| 国产成人无码区免费内射一片色欲| 制服丝袜中文字幕在线| 成人无码区免费A∨直播| 亚洲动漫精品无码av天堂| A狠狠久久蜜臀婷色中文网| 国产亚洲情侣一区二区无码AV| 亚洲AV永久无码精品网站在线观看| 久久精品中文字幕一区| 亚洲中文字幕无码久久2020| 东京热无码av一区二区| 日韩精品人妻系列无码专区 | 亚洲中文字幕伊人久久无码| 日韩人妻无码中文字幕视频| 无码精品人妻一区二区三区免费| 久久久久亚洲AV无码专区体验| 亚洲熟妇无码AV在线播放| 中文字幕在线观看一区二区| 欧美在线中文字幕| 精品人妻中文av一区二区三区| 亚洲人成国产精品无码| 无码日韩人妻AV一区免费l| 国产羞羞的视频在线观看 国产一级无码视频在线 | 精品国产a∨无码一区二区三区| 中文字幕日韩欧美一区二区| 青娱乐在线国产中文字幕免費資訊 | 国产久热精品无码激情| 久久国产亚洲精品无码| 国产精品99精品无码视亚| 50岁人妻丰满熟妇αv无码区| 亚洲中文字幕无码久久综合网| 亚洲啪啪AV无码片| 无码人妻黑人中文字幕| 亚洲av成人无码久久精品| 亚洲AV区无码字幕中文色| 久久久无码精品亚洲日韩按摩| 18禁无遮拦无码国产在线播放 |