US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
    China / Government

    Top court upholds record penalty of $26m for water pollution

    By CAO YIN (China Daily) Updated: 2016-01-22 08:24

    Top court upholds record penalty of $26m for water pollution

    The Supreme People's Court holds a public hearing over the environmental public interest case on the afternoon of Jan 21, 2016.?[Photo provided by the Supreme People's Court]

    China's top court rejected on Thursday an application for a new hearing of an environmental public interest case, upholding the original ruling.

    The applicant, the Jinhui company in Taizhou, Jiangsu province, appealed the initial ruling that ordered the company and five others to pay more than 160 million yuan ($26 million) in compensation for discharging waste acids into two rivers.

    It was the biggest environmental penalty imposed in China arising from a public interest case concerning polluters. It was also the first time that the Supreme People's Court had heard such litigation.

    In August 2014, the Taizhou City Environmental Protection Association, a public interest group, sued the six companies in the local intermediate people's court.

    The association said the companies sold 25,000 metric tons of waste acids to a firm that did not have the authority to discharge the acids into the rivers. The discharge resulted in serious environmental pollution.

    A month later, the intermediate people's court ordered the six defendants to pay more than 160 million yuan to restore the environment.

    In December 2014, Jiangsu Provincial High People's Court upheld the verdict.

    The Jinhui company's lawyer, Zhao Bing, said during Thursday's application hearing that the rivers were able to purify the pollutants naturally, and that such a large amount of money was not needed to restore the environment.

    "My client just sold the acids under a contract signed with the Jiangzhong company that was in charge of dealing with the waste, and did not discharge the acids itself," Zhao said.

    But the association said that the Jiangzhong company was not qualified to handle the acids under national discharge regulations, adding that the acids were still dangerous to the environment.

    The top court said after hearing arguments from the two sides that the Jinhui company "should be obligated to pay attention to such a contract involving dangerous acids and also has responsibility for the discharge".

    Lin Wenxue, the judge responsible for the case, said, "Although the rivers can self-purify such a discharge, it still damaged the surrounding environment."

    Zhou Ke, a law professor at Renmin University of China, said, "The case heard by the top court will guide grassroots courts on how to deal with such litigation."

    Wang Shuyi, an environmental law professor at Wuhan University, said the public hearing also showed that Chinese judicial bodies have played their role in environmental protection.

    Highlights
    Hot Topics
    ...
    亚洲AV无码国产在丝袜线观看| 欧洲精品久久久av无码电影| 中文成人无码精品久久久不卡| 国模GOGO无码人体啪啪| 久久99精品久久久久久hb无码| 中文字幕一区二区精品区| 亚洲中文字幕久久精品无码喷水| 久久无码中文字幕东京热| 亚洲欧洲中文日韩久久AV乱码| 国产成人无码AV一区二区在线观看 | 制服丝袜日韩中文字幕在线| 欧美日韩中文国产一区发布 | 久久久无码精品午夜| 亚洲中文字幕久久精品无码喷水| 久久久久久无码Av成人影院| 国产成年无码久久久免费| 中文字幕亚洲精品| 久久精品中文字幕无码绿巨人| 久久人妻无码中文字幕| 欧美日韩中文字幕在线看| 无码国产乱人伦偷精品视频| 无码精品久久一区二区三区| 亚洲中文字幕无码爆乳av中文 | 欧美精品丝袜久久久中文字幕| 中文字幕人妻无码专区| 久久人妻少妇嫩草AV无码蜜桃| 国产av永久无码天堂影院| 人妻丰满熟妇岳AV无码区HD| 亚洲AV日韩AV永久无码绿巨人| 中文字幕人妻无码一区二区三区 | 最近高清中文字幕无吗免费看| 92午夜少妇极品福利无码电影| 中文字幕一区二区三区久久网站 | 亚洲精品无码专区在线播放| 亚洲AV无码乱码在线观看牲色| 黑人无码精品又粗又大又长 | 乱人伦中文视频在线| 中文无码久久精品| 日韩国产中文字幕| 成?∨人片在线观看无码 | 中文字幕人妻色偷偷久久 |