US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
    China / Government

    Top court upholds record penalty of $26m for water pollution

    By CAO YIN (China Daily) Updated: 2016-01-22 08:24

    Top court upholds record penalty of $26m for water pollution

    The Supreme People's Court holds a public hearing over the environmental public interest case on the afternoon of Jan 21, 2016.?[Photo provided by the Supreme People's Court]

    China's top court rejected on Thursday an application for a new hearing of an environmental public interest case, upholding the original ruling.

    The applicant, the Jinhui company in Taizhou, Jiangsu province, appealed the initial ruling that ordered the company and five others to pay more than 160 million yuan ($26 million) in compensation for discharging waste acids into two rivers.

    It was the biggest environmental penalty imposed in China arising from a public interest case concerning polluters. It was also the first time that the Supreme People's Court had heard such litigation.

    In August 2014, the Taizhou City Environmental Protection Association, a public interest group, sued the six companies in the local intermediate people's court.

    The association said the companies sold 25,000 metric tons of waste acids to a firm that did not have the authority to discharge the acids into the rivers. The discharge resulted in serious environmental pollution.

    A month later, the intermediate people's court ordered the six defendants to pay more than 160 million yuan to restore the environment.

    In December 2014, Jiangsu Provincial High People's Court upheld the verdict.

    The Jinhui company's lawyer, Zhao Bing, said during Thursday's application hearing that the rivers were able to purify the pollutants naturally, and that such a large amount of money was not needed to restore the environment.

    "My client just sold the acids under a contract signed with the Jiangzhong company that was in charge of dealing with the waste, and did not discharge the acids itself," Zhao said.

    But the association said that the Jiangzhong company was not qualified to handle the acids under national discharge regulations, adding that the acids were still dangerous to the environment.

    The top court said after hearing arguments from the two sides that the Jinhui company "should be obligated to pay attention to such a contract involving dangerous acids and also has responsibility for the discharge".

    Lin Wenxue, the judge responsible for the case, said, "Although the rivers can self-purify such a discharge, it still damaged the surrounding environment."

    Zhou Ke, a law professor at Renmin University of China, said, "The case heard by the top court will guide grassroots courts on how to deal with such litigation."

    Wang Shuyi, an environmental law professor at Wuhan University, said the public hearing also showed that Chinese judicial bodies have played their role in environmental protection.

    Highlights
    Hot Topics
    ...
    最好看更新中文字幕| 中文字字幕在线中文无码| 亚洲Av综合色区无码专区桃色| 亚洲AV无码资源在线观看| 亚洲AV无码乱码国产麻豆穿越 | 国产成人无码AⅤ片在线观看| 亚洲中文字幕伊人久久无码| 无码人妻一区二区三区免费看| 最近免费中文字幕大全免费| 中文文字幕文字幕亚洲色| 精品三级AV无码一区| 国产aⅴ无码专区亚洲av麻豆| 狠狠躁天天躁无码中文字幕| 四虎国产精品永久在线无码 | 精品无码国产自产拍在线观看蜜| 中文字幕无码日韩专区| 亚洲伊人久久综合中文成人网| 亚洲乳大丰满中文字幕| 亚洲AV无码不卡在线观看下载| 国产无遮挡无码视频免费软件| 未满十八18禁止免费无码网站| 国模无码人体一区二区 | 亚洲精品高清无码视频| 最近中文字幕免费大全| 天堂中文字幕在线| 人妻精品久久久久中文字幕| 最近最新中文字幕| 中文字幕视频在线| 最近2019免费中文字幕6| 日韩中文在线视频| 最新版天堂资源中文网| 亚洲va中文字幕无码| 最好看的电影2019中文字幕 | 无码国内精品久久综合88| 中文字幕精品久久| 最新中文字幕AV无码不卡| 亚洲av无码一区二区三区在线播放 | 狠狠噜天天噜日日噜无码| 狠狠躁夜夜躁无码中文字幕| 国产亚洲精品无码专区| 亚洲AV永久无码天堂影院|