French experts question GMO cancer study

    VOA 2012-10-24 13:23

     

    Get Flash Player

    Get Flash Player

    Download

    French officials and experts have added their voices to the chorus of criticism over a recent study linking genetically modified corn to tumors in experimental rats.

    The French national food safety agency joined six scientific academies in concluding the study was too badly done to support its conclusions.

    The debate comes as voters in the US state of California consider whether to require labels on all foods with ingredients from genetically modified organisms, or GMOs.

    Disturbing images

    The study in the journal Food and Chemical Toxicology included shocking photos of rats which researchers say grew giant tumors after eating GMO corn for two years.

    Study author Gilles-Eric Seralini at the University of Caen says his findings show regulations on the crop are not good enough.

    "GM foods have been evaluated in an extremely poor and lax way with much less analysis than we have done," Seralini says.

    Eighty percent of the packaged foods on US supermarket shelves contain GMO ingredients, according to the Grocery Manufacturers Association.

    California advocates of a law requiring those ingredients to be identified on food labels have used the French study to bolster their argument.

    The “Yes on 37” campaign, backing mandatory GMO labeling in this November’s statewide voter referendum, held a press conference with Seralini to announce the results of his research.

    'Numerous problems'

    However, other scientists immediately found problems with the study, including geneticist Alan McHughen at the University of California at Riverside, an expert with the prestigious U.S. National Academy of Sciences.

    “First of all, the authors of the study used a line of rats that was genetically predisposed to form tumors in the first place," McHughen says. "So right off the bat the whole study was suspect.”

    The European Food Safety Authority also found numerous problems with the French study, from not enough control rats to substandard analytical methods. And the French science academies said the release of the study, which coincided with the release of a book and a film highlighting the work, raised ethical problems.

    At the University of California at Davis, toxicologist Alison van Eenennaam questioned the researchers’ motives.

    “I think it was a cynical ploy to exploit the scientific process to create fear in the minds of consumers,” she says.

    Long-term tests?

    Even opponents of genetic engineering agree the study was flawed. But they believe more long-term studies should be done.

    “There should be required safety assessments before these crops are put on the market," says Michael Hansen, with the advocacy group Consumers Union. "That is not what happens in the United States.”

    The French food safety authority called for more publicly funded research covering the entire life span of experimental animals.

    US tests

    The US Food and Drug Administration normally reviews voluntary safety assessments that companies submit for new GM crops. They typically include a 90-day rat-feeding test for toxicity.

    That is the international standard. And the longer studies that have been done have not shown major problems, says UC Davis’s Alison van Eenennaam.

    “The science doesn’t show there’s any additional data that wouldn’t already be caught at these 90-day studies,” she says.

    Regulators OK GMOs

    Regulators in the U.S. and Europe, as well as the U.N.’s World Health Organization and Food and Agriculture Organization, have concluded that genetically modified products on the shelves today are no more dangerous than products made the usual way, according to UC Riverside’s Alan McHughen.

    “All of those, I think, give us the body of scientific evidence to state with a certain degree of confidence that yes, these products are as safe as other products on the market,” McHughen says.

    Public confidence in this reassurance will be put to the test in the California referendum November 6, when state voters decide if GM foods should carry a special label.

    相關閱讀

    Pirate attacks are down in 2012

    Serving farm-fresh meals at the farm

    Maryland shop cooks up chocolate vote

    Interfaith worshipers celebrate sea, surf

    (來源:VOA 編輯:Julie)

     
    中國日報網英語點津版權說明:凡注明來源為“中國日報網英語點津:XXX(署名)”的原創作品,除與中國日報網簽署英語點津內容授權協議的網站外,其他任何網站或單位未經允許不得非法盜鏈、轉載和使用,違者必究。如需使用,請與010-84883561聯系;凡本網注明“來源:XXX(非英語點津)”的作品,均轉載自其它媒體,目的在于傳播更多信息,其他媒體如需轉載,請與稿件來源方聯系,如產生任何問題與本網無關;本網所發布的歌曲、電影片段,版權歸原作者所有,僅供學習與研究,如果侵權,請提供版權證明,以便盡快刪除。

    中國日報網雙語新聞

    掃描左側二維碼

    添加Chinadaily_Mobile
    你想看的我們這兒都有!

    中國日報雙語手機報

    點擊左側圖標查看訂閱方式

    中國首份雙語手機報
    學英語看資訊一個都不能少!

    關注和訂閱

    本文相關閱讀
    人氣排行
    熱搜詞
     
     
    精華欄目
     

    閱讀

    詞匯

    視聽

    翻譯

    口語

    合作

     

    關于我們 | 聯系方式 | 招聘信息

    Copyright by chinadaily.com.cn. All rights reserved. None of this material may be used for any commercial or public use. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. 版權聲明:本網站所刊登的中國日報網英語點津內容,版權屬中國日報網所有,未經協議授權,禁止下載使用。 歡迎愿意與本網站合作的單位或個人與我們聯系。

    電話:8610-84883645

    傳真:8610-84883500

    Email: languagetips@chinadaily.com.cn

    亚洲av中文无码乱人伦在线播放| 国产精品无码v在线观看| 国产白丝无码免费视频| 最近中文字幕2019视频1| 黑人无码精品又粗又大又长 | 精品久久久久久无码中文野结衣| 欧美日韩中文国产va另类| 亚洲av麻豆aⅴ无码电影| 亚洲AV无码成人专区片在线观看| 日韩精品久久无码人妻中文字幕| 熟妇人妻系列aⅴ无码专区友真希| 成年无码av片在线| 午夜无码A级毛片免费视频 | 日韩综合无码一区二区| 亚洲中文字幕无码一久久区| 50岁人妻丰满熟妇αv无码区| 亚洲午夜国产精品无码老牛影视| 中文字幕免费在线| 中文字幕Av一区乱码| 毛片一区二区三区无码| 精品无码国产自产拍在线观看| 中文字幕AV中文字无码亚| 最近中文字幕视频在线资源| 乱人伦中文无码视频在线观看| 91久久精品无码一区二区毛片 | 亚洲国产精品无码久久一线| 亚洲国产午夜中文字幕精品黄网站| 亚洲中文字幕在线第六区| 亚洲成a人无码av波多野按摩 | 久久精品中文字幕大胸| 精品人体无码一区二区三区 | 18禁网站免费无遮挡无码中文| 亚洲AV日韩AV永久无码免下载| 99精品人妻无码专区在线视频区| 色婷婷综合久久久久中文字幕 | 亚洲午夜国产精品无码老牛影视 | 人妻无码久久一区二区三区免费| 亚洲AV无码一区二区三区系列| 亚洲VA成无码人在线观看天堂| 无码一区二区三区在线观看| 人妻少妇乱子伦无码视频专区|