English 中文網(wǎng) 漫畫網(wǎng) 愛新聞iNews 翻譯論壇
    中國網(wǎng)站品牌欄目(頻道)
    當(dāng)前位置: Language Tips> 譯通四海> Columnist 專欄作家> Liu Shinan

    See-through mechanism for officials

    [ 2009-05-31 10:52]     字號 [] [] []  
    免費(fèi)訂閱30天China Daily雙語新聞手機(jī)報(bào):移動(dòng)用戶編輯短信CD至106580009009

    See-through mechanism for officialsIn an interview with China Daily published yesterday, a professor from the Party School of the Communist Party of China Central Committee said that government and Party officials found responsible for major accidents should never be promoted again "unless they make extraordinary contributions to society in their new positions."

    The "expert on government regulations" made the remark while responding to the recent revelation of a series of cases in which disciplined and sacked officials were moved to different places to continue in their posts or even be promoted. Media reports about the cases have aroused public outcry.

    The scholar's suggestion that the officials "should never be promoted again" sounds much too conclusive. One cannot rule out the possibility that the disgraced officials are of good nature, and that there was some element of fortuity in their role in the accidents.

    Take for example Meng Xuenong, the former governor of Shanxi province that is recurrently stricken by coalmine accidents. He was appointed to the post in January 2008 only to be discharged in September the same year after the collapse of a coalmine that killed 270 people. Internet citizens called him "the most unlucky official". Earlier, in 2003, he had been sacked as the mayor of Beijing for the failure to deal adequately with SARS immediately after its outbreak in the city. This was just two months after he was promoted to the position.

    See-through mechanism for officials

    I am not defending him against the decision of the central authorities to disqualify him. It is definitely a welcome practice to hold the highest official responsible for a major accident in his/her jurisdiction. At the same time, it should not be made absolute that an official would never be promoted once he made a mistake. It all depends on how much responsibility he/she actually had in the matter and if he/she is really bad or corrupt in a moral sense.

    In fact, the public was infuriated over cases of disciplined officials continuing their career in a different place because of two reasons: First, many of the officials involved in the cases were corrupt; second, re-appointment of the officials was done by keeping all concerned in the dark.

    Re-appointment by itself is not the problem. What deserves more attention is the process of these officials being moved and placed elsewhere. If the processes were open to public scrutiny, corrupt officials would never have the chance of being re-appointed; and, those sacked merely for dereliction of duty would be scrutinized by the public before being promoted. The point is that the authorities never publicize the process.

    The promotion of an official with an undesirable record, however, should be conducted in a more transparent way, because these officials have lost public trust. There should be convincing evidence that they have made up for their mistakes and are qualified for the new jobs. In other words, there must be a mechanism to guarantee that the officials to be promoted are subjected to public scrutiny. This is exactly what China lacks in the management of officials.

    "Administrative transparency," as has been advocated by the Chinese central government for many years, is a most effective way to curb officials' corruption. An opaque administration enables abuse of power to advance private interests. We should not rely on "education" alone for persuading officials to be honest and clean. There has to be a mechanism to compel them to act in the interests of the nation and the public.

    Transparent administration is such a mechanism.

    E-mail: liushinan@chinadaily.com.cn

    About the author:

    劉式南 高級編輯。1968年畢業(yè)于武漢華中師范學(xué)院(現(xiàn)華中師范大學(xué))英文系。1982年畢業(yè)于北京體育學(xué)院(現(xiàn)北京體育大學(xué))研究生院體育情報(bào)專業(yè)。1982年進(jìn)入中國日報(bào)社,先后擔(dān)任體育記者、時(shí)政記者、國際新聞編輯、要聞版責(zé)任編輯、發(fā)稿部主任、《上海英文星報(bào)》總編輯、《中國商業(yè)周刊》總編輯等職。現(xiàn)任《中國日報(bào)》總編輯助理及專欄作家。1997年獲國務(wù)院“特殊貢獻(xiàn)專家政府津貼”。2000年被中華全國新聞工作者協(xié)會(huì)授予“全國百佳新聞工作者”稱號。2006年獲中國新聞獎(jiǎng)二等獎(jiǎng)(編輯)。

    ?相關(guān)閱讀:

    Public mood is never to be ignored

    Removing red-carpet barriers

    Corruption as food for thought

    Officials should channel spirit of Bethune

     

     
    中國日報(bào)網(wǎng)英語點(diǎn)津版權(quán)說明:凡注明來源為“中國日報(bào)網(wǎng)英語點(diǎn)津:XXX(署名)”的原創(chuàng)作品,除與中國日報(bào)網(wǎng)簽署英語點(diǎn)津內(nèi)容授權(quán)協(xié)議的網(wǎng)站外,其他任何網(wǎng)站或單位未經(jīng)允許不得非法盜鏈、轉(zhuǎn)載和使用,違者必究。如需使用,請與010-84883631聯(lián)系;凡本網(wǎng)注明“來源:XXX(非英語點(diǎn)津)”的作品,均轉(zhuǎn)載自其它媒體,目的在于傳播更多信息,其他媒體如需轉(zhuǎn)載,請與稿件來源方聯(lián)系,如產(chǎn)生任何問題與本網(wǎng)無關(guān);本網(wǎng)所發(fā)布的歌曲、電影片段,版權(quán)歸原作者所有,僅供學(xué)習(xí)與研究,如果侵權(quán),請?zhí)峁┌鏅?quán)證明,以便盡快刪除。
     

    關(guān)注和訂閱

    人氣排行

    翻譯服務(wù)

    中國日報(bào)網(wǎng)翻譯工作室

    我們提供:媒體、文化、財(cái)經(jīng)法律等專業(yè)領(lǐng)域的中英互譯服務(wù)
    電話:010-84883468
    郵件:translate@chinadaily.com.cn
     
     
    日韩欧美中文字幕一字不卡| A∨变态另类天堂无码专区| 国产激情无码一区二区| 最好看的中文字幕最经典的中文字幕视频 | 日韩精品无码久久久久久 | 无码粉嫩小泬无套在线观看| 无码精品第一页| 欧洲人妻丰满av无码久久不卡| 亚洲欧美在线一区中文字幕| 精品久久久中文字幕人妻| 东京热无码av一区二区 | www无码乱伦| 日韩精品中文字幕无码一区| 免费无码国产欧美久久18| 最近中文字幕完整版资源 | 无码人妻精品中文字幕免费东京热 | 亚洲av无码潮喷在线观看| 无码乱码av天堂一区二区| 国产中文在线亚洲精品官网| 中文字幕精品无码一区二区三区| 成在线人AV免费无码高潮喷水| 色综合久久无码五十路人妻| 亚洲欧洲无码AV电影在线观看| 国产成人无码精品久久久性色| 亚洲欧美日韩中文字幕一区二区三区 | 人妻丰满熟妇aⅴ无码| √天堂中文www官网在线| 最近2019在线观看中文视频| 日韩欧美群交P片內射中文| 亚洲午夜福利精品无码| 日本妇人成熟免费中文字幕| 亚洲中文字幕无码爆乳av中文| 亚洲av无码成人精品区在线播放| 亚洲AV无码成人精品区狼人影院| 最近高清中文字幕无吗免费看 | 中文字幕一区图| 中文字幕一区视频| 东京热人妻无码一区二区av| 亚洲AV无码成人精品区蜜桃| 久久久久久人妻无码| 免费无码黄十八禁网站在线观看|