English 中文網(wǎng) 漫畫網(wǎng) 愛新聞iNews 翻譯論壇
    中國網(wǎng)站品牌欄目(頻道)
    當前位置: Language Tips> 譯通四海> Columnist 專欄作家> Liu Shinan

    Three young lives rise above death

    [ 2009-10-28 10:28]     字號 [] [] []  
    免費訂閱30天China Daily雙語新聞手機報:移動用戶編輯短信CD至106580009009

    I have written several columns on today's high school and college students, expressing my worries over their being pampered by parents and their susceptibility to hedonism. Though I have never doubted the moral quality of the majority of the youths, the heroic deed of three university freshmen, who sacrificed their lives to save two young boys from drowning in the Yangtze River, still humbled me.

    Fourteen students from Changjiang University in Jingzhou, Hubei province, had assembled for a get-together on one of the banks of the Yangtze on Saturday morning when they saw two boys falling into the river. They, including several female students, immediately jumped into the water and joined hands to form a human chain, and tried to pull the two kids from the swift currents.

    After one of the boys was pulled to safety and the other was approaching the bank, a strong current broke the human chain. Three winter swimmers, all in their sixties, happened to be nearby and came to the students' rescue. They pulled out six of them, but could not save the other three. All the three were 19-years-old and had enrolled in the university only two months ago.

    Hundreds of thousands of people have posted comments on websites, paying their respects to the students and the three old men. Many have mourned the snuffing out of the three young lives.

    But some people have questioned the rationality of the students' action. They ask if it was worth saving two boys at the cost of three university students' lives.

    Such doubts stem from the thought developed over the past three decades of economic reform that the rationality of any move should be judged in terms of economic value and the efficiency it generates.

    For quite a number of people, money and other worldly benefits have become the only criterion of judging an action. It is this mindset that prompts the doubters to claim that the life of three university students is greater than that of two young kids. Therefore, they argue, the move of the students is respectable but should not be encouraged.

    This is ridiculous logic. It is tantamount to questioning the nobility of the heroes. We do feel sorry for the three students' families. We sympathize from the core of our hearts with all their loved ones. But we also share the pride of the parents for giving birth to and bringing up brave and selfless children.

    The three heroes' sacrifice is even more precious because it defies the current mindless trend of self-centeredness.

    When the students jumped into the cold water, they did not think about how the world would judge them. They did not have enough time to think about the potential dangers either. They acted only out of instinct, the human instinct of saving another human. This instinct is nurtured by our parents and teachers. It is the result of the culture rooted in our soil.

    It is reassuring to know that our tradition of valuing and admiring a sacrifice has passed on to the present generation. It is also reassuring to see that the concept of "protecting one's own life is far more important than fighting a crime or saving another life", which has developed in recent years, is not the motto of all our youths.

    We should be grateful, too, to the three students for carrying forward the spirit of humanity and the nation. And we should not forget the selfless act of the other students who, too, jumped into the river and were saved by the sexagenarians.

    The incident teaches us a vital lesson: We should be prepared for any eventuality in life. Unfortunately, most of the students did not know how to swim, and that may have made them vulnerable. I remember when I was in college in the 1960s, swimming was a compulsory part of our physical education course. That's why a netizen's remark deserves special attention: "Very few college students are interested in swimming nowadays. On the contrary, we see too many youths roller-skating on the streets."

    liushinan@chinadaily.com.cn

    About the author:

    劉式南 高級編輯。1968年畢業(yè)于武漢華中師范學院(現(xiàn)華中師范大學)英文系。1982年畢業(yè)于北京體育學院(現(xiàn)北京體育大學)研究生院體育情報專業(yè)。1982年進入中國日報社,先后擔任體育記者、時政記者、國際新聞編輯、要聞版責任編輯、發(fā)稿部主任、《上海英文星報》總編輯、《中國商業(yè)周刊》總編輯等職?,F(xiàn)任《中國日報》總編輯助理及專欄作家。1997年獲國務院“特殊貢獻專家政府津貼”。2000年被中華全國新聞工作者協(xié)會授予“全國百佳新聞工作者”稱號。2006年獲中國新聞獎二等獎(編輯)。

    相關(guān)閱讀:

    Why cry wolf over a fair traffic law

    Spare the rod and spoil the child?

    What are we making of our children?

    Climatic irony of an Arctic shipping lane

     

     
    中國日報網(wǎng)英語點津版權(quán)說明:凡注明來源為“中國日報網(wǎng)英語點津:XXX(署名)”的原創(chuàng)作品,除與中國日報網(wǎng)簽署英語點津內(nèi)容授權(quán)協(xié)議的網(wǎng)站外,其他任何網(wǎng)站或單位未經(jīng)允許不得非法盜鏈、轉(zhuǎn)載和使用,違者必究。如需使用,請與010-84883631聯(lián)系;凡本網(wǎng)注明“來源:XXX(非英語點津)”的作品,均轉(zhuǎn)載自其它媒體,目的在于傳播更多信息,其他媒體如需轉(zhuǎn)載,請與稿件來源方聯(lián)系,如產(chǎn)生任何問題與本網(wǎng)無關(guān);本網(wǎng)所發(fā)布的歌曲、電影片段,版權(quán)歸原作者所有,僅供學習與研究,如果侵權(quán),請?zhí)峁┌鏅?quán)證明,以便盡快刪除。
     

    關(guān)注和訂閱

    人氣排行

    翻譯服務

    中國日報網(wǎng)翻譯工作室

    我們提供:媒體、文化、財經(jīng)法律等專業(yè)領(lǐng)域的中英互譯服務
    電話:010-84883468
    郵件:translate@chinadaily.com.cn
     
     
    亚洲爆乳无码一区二区三区| 亚洲无码高清在线观看| 亚洲中文字幕日本无线码| 中文字幕av无码一区二区三区电影 | 中文字幕无码不卡在线| 亚洲av中文无码| 人妻丰满熟妇无码区免费| 中文字幕日韩理论在线| 人妻少妇久久中文字幕| 精品国产毛片一区二区无码| 亚洲V无码一区二区三区四区观看| 最近2022中文字幕免费视频| 久久人妻无码中文字幕| 国产精品无码永久免费888| 无码人妻精品一区二区三区久久 | 红桃AV一区二区三区在线无码AV| 亚洲一区无码中文字幕| 亚洲一区无码精品色| 国产亚洲精久久久久久无码AV| 亚洲av无码专区国产乱码在线观看| 性无码专区一色吊丝中文字幕| 亚洲中文字幕无码中文字在线| 久久精品无码专区免费 | 久久久久无码专区亚洲av| 无码精品国产一区二区三区免费 | 日韩AV无码精品人妻系列| 成人无码免费一区二区三区| 最近中文字幕大全2019| 国产中文在线亚洲精品官网| 色婷婷综合久久久久中文一区二区| 中文字幕在线观看亚洲视频| 亚洲精品国产日韩无码AV永久免费网| 精品无码国产自产拍在线观看蜜| 国产AV无码专区亚洲AV毛网站| 久久久久无码精品国产不卡 | 久久无码精品一区二区三区| 国产AV无码专区亚洲精品| 免费a级毛片无码免费视频| 日韩专区无码人妻| 久久中文字幕人妻丝袜| 最近2019年中文字幕6|