left corner left corner
    China Daily Website

    US playing strategic arms game

    Updated: 2013-01-11 01:20
    By Hu Yumin ( China Daily)

    The US could cut its defense spending because of the fiscal cliff. But it would be wrong to assume that such a cut will weaken the US military.

    In fact, the US has allocated more funds for the development of Prompt Global Strike, a system that can deliver a precision non-nuclear weapon strike anywhere in the world within 1 hour. The number of such weapons in the US armory will continue to grow, with the Russian Defense Ministry estimating that Washington will have 1,500 to 1,800 sea- and air-based first-strike cruise missiles by 2015 and 2,500 to 3,000 by 2020.

    The US aims to combine PGS with its space and anti-missile technologies to form an integrated defense system, which could render other countries' strategic weapons, including nuclear arms, almost useless. It intends to break the global and regional strategic balance, minimize other countries' capability of strategic counterattack during emergencies and squeeze their strategic space.

    This could put other countries in a dilemma: they either lose the capability to launch a strategic nuclear counterattack or use nuclear weapons first to avoid devastation.

    Russia's army, navy as well as air force still have the capability to deal with any challenge. Moscow's Topol-M missiles are its major strategic nuclear deterrent and the project to deploy them is the most important part of its national armament planning. Russia has a reliable protection system, which also consists of multi-range anti-aircraft missiles to defend against air attacks from even high-precision non-nuclear weapons.

    The Russian army has a multi-level firepower system, comprising C-400 and C-400M anti-aircraft missiles, and Thor and Amor anti-aircraft missile launchers, which is regarded as the best anti-aircraft power combination targeting PGS.

    Since Russia's strategic weapon system is better than China's in terms of numbers, mobility and protection capabilities some experts believe that the US army's PGS poses a greater threat to China than Russia.

    To many defense experts' surprise, Chinese military experts seem to pay more attention to missile defense while ignoring the precision-guided prompt long-distance strike system. Some experts even say that China faces a difficult choice. On one hand, it is not sure of being able to build an effective protection system. On the other, even if it can build one, it will expose its limited and covert strategic missile launching bases.

    During talks on strategic arms reduction, Russia has opposed the US' use of nuclear weapons delivery vehicles for non-nuclear military objectives because it not only helps the US save huge amounts in defense spending, but also boosts its PGS project.

    It is highly likely that Russia will stick to its stance at future strategic weapons reduction talks. But the fact is Russia can hardly stop the US from going ahead with its plan. Apart from demanding restrictions on the deployment of the European Antimissile System and seeking other nuclear powers' support, Russia does not have the bargaining chips to force the US into accepting its demand.

    Major countries know that the advances made in military science and technology have made strategic stability in nuclear and non-nuclear fields highly correlated, especially during the strategic deployment process. And over-dependence on nuclear power, especially during an emergency, can undermine a country's national security.

    But since other countries, compared to the US, are at a disadvantage in terms of conventional weapon systems, they have to adopt asymmetric corresponding actions. Global strategic stability depends more on the stability in Europe and Northeast Asia. This is something that the international community should understand and tell the countries that are calling for a "nuclear-free world" not to develop conventional weapons to replace nuclear ones, because it will have serous consequences on international security.

    Some insightful people in the US have indeed emphasized the importance of maintaining global strategic stability. In 1967, Robert McNamara, then US secretary of defense, suggested that the former Soviet Union restrict the development of its anti-missile system to avoid escalating tensions. Initially, the Soviet Union opposed the idea but eventually it accepted it because it realized that developing the anti-missile system was destabilizing the world. This led to the 1972 Treaty on the Limitation of Anti-Ballistic Missile Systems between the Soviet Union and the US.

    In 1985, when the US began experiments on how to use missiles to destroy low earth orbit satellites, many American senators and scholars said a US-Soviet Union race in this field was dangerous. Since the Soviet Union had unilaterally stopped its anti-satellite experiments in 1983, the US also gave up its tests later.

    People who value peace hope that long-distance launching vehicles for precision-guided conventional warheads and missile defense systems will be part of the agenda at the strategic arms reduction talks.

    The author is a senior research fellow with China Arms Control and Disarmament Association.

     
    ...
    久久综合中文字幕| 国产成人麻豆亚洲综合无码精品| 日韩中文字幕一区| 91精品无码久久久久久五月天| 一级中文字幕免费乱码专区| 亚洲AV无码不卡在线观看下载| 亚洲午夜国产精品无码| 人妻少妇精品中文字幕av蜜桃| AV无码免费永久在线观看| 亚洲国产精品无码专区影院| 亚洲欧美中文字幕| 欧日韩国产无码专区| 无码囯产精品一区二区免费 | 中出人妻中文字幕无码| 亚洲中文字幕在线第六区| 国产精品无码一区二区在线| 亚洲AV无码专区在线播放中文| 日韩三级中文字幕| 波多野结衣中文在线| 亚洲天堂2017无码中文| 国产亚洲精品无码拍拍拍色欲| 无码AV岛国片在线播放| 亚洲av无码片vr一区二区三区| 国产成人无码区免费网站| 日韩欧美成人免费中文字幕| 最近中文字幕完整免费视频ww| 中文字幕无码人妻AAA片| 亚洲免费无码在线| 亚洲av无码成人精品区| 免费无码AV一区二区| 久久99久久无码毛片一区二区 | 一本一道av中文字幕无码| 精品深夜AV无码一区二区老年| 娇小性色xxxxx中文| 亚洲中文字幕无码久久2017| 成人性生交大片免费看中文| 忘忧草在线社区WWW中国中文| 亚洲成av人片在线观看天堂无码| 亚洲午夜AV无码专区在线播放| 亚洲AV无码成人精品区大在线| 亚洲成在人线在线播放无码|