說假話的老師

    英語學習雜志 2015-06-30 11:17

     

    說假話的老師

    My Favorite Liar

    說假話的老師

    By Kai Peter Chang 安然 選 盧青亮譯

    Get Flash Player

    One of my favorite professors in college was a self-confessed liar.

    I guess that statement requires a bit of explanation.

    The topic of Corporate Finance/Capital Markets is, even within the world of the Dismal Science, (Economics) an exceptionally dry and boring subject matter, encumbered by complex mathematic models and obscure economic theory.[1]

    What made Dr. K memorable was a gimmick[2] he employed that began with his introduction at the beginning of his first class:

    "Now I know some of you have already heard of me, but for the benefit of those who are unfamiliar, let me explain how I teach. Between today until the class right before finals, it is my intention to work into each of my lectures…one lie. Your job, as students, among other things, is to try and catch me in the Lie of the Day."

    And thus began our ten-week course.

    This was an insidiously[3] brilliant technique to focus our attention—by offering an open invitation for students to challenge his statements, he transmitted lessons that lasted far beyond the immediate subject matter and taught us to constantly check new statements and claims with what we already accept as fact.

    Early in the quarter, the Lie of the Day was usually obvious—immediately triggering a forest of raised hands to challenge the falsehood. Dr. K would smile, draw a line through that section of the board, and utter his trademark phrase "Very good! In fact, the opposite is true. Moving on..."

    As the quarter progressed, the Lie of the Day became more subtle, and many ended up slipping past a majority of the students unnoticed until a particularly alert person stopped the lecture to flag the disinformation.

    Every once in a while, a lecture would end withnobody catching the lie which created its own unique classroom experience—in any other college lecture, end of the class hour prompts a swift rush of feet and zipping up of bookbags as students make a beeline for the door.

    On the days when nobody caught the lie, we all sat in silence, looking at each other as Dr. K, looking quite pleased with himself, said with a sly grin: "Ah ha! Each of you has one falsehood in your lecture notes. Discuss amongst yourselves what it might be, and I will tell you next Monday. That is all."

    Those lectures forced us to puzzle things out[4], work out various angles in study groups so we could approach him with our theories the following week.

    Brilliant...but what made Dr. K's technique most insidiously evil and genius was, during the most technically difficult lecture of the entire quarter, there was no lie. At the end of the lecture in which he was not called on any lie, he offered the same challenge to work through the notes; on the following Monday, he fielded[5] our theories for what the falsehood might be (and shooting them down "no, in fact that is true—look at [x]") for almost ten minutes before he finally revealed: "Do you remember the first lecture—how I said that 'every lecture has a lie?'"

    Exhausted from having our best theories shot down, we nodded.

    "Well—THAT was a lie. My previous lecture was completely on the level[6]. But I am glad you reviewed your notes rigorously this weekend—a lot of it will be on the final. Moving on…” Which prompted an arousing melange of exasperated groans and laughter from the classroom.[7]

    And while my knowledge of the Economics of Capital Markets has faded in time, the lessons that stayed with me were his real legacy:

    "Experts" can be wrong, and say things that sound right—so build a habit of evaluating new information and check it against things you already accept as fact.

    If you see something wrong, take the initiative to[8] flag it as misinformation.

    A sense of playfulness is the best defense against taking yourself too seriously.

    I've had many instructors before and since, but few that I remember with as much fondness—and why my favorite professor was a chronic[9] liar.

    Vocabulary
    1. the Dismal Science: “沉悶科學”,即經濟學,由19世紀歷史學家托馬斯·卡萊爾創造的一個貶義的替代名稱;encumber: 阻礙,拖累。
    2. gimmick: 花招,把戲。
    3. insidiously: 暗中為害地。
    4. puzzle out: 苦苦思索而弄清楚。
    5. field: v. 圓滿地答復,巧妙地回答。
    6. on the level: 誠實的,可靠的。
    7. melange: 混合物;exasperated: 惱怒的;groan: 呻吟。
    8. take the initiative to do: 積極主動地去做。
    9. chronic: 積習難改的,有癮的。

    上一頁 1 2 下一頁

    上一篇 : “希臘生活”席卷美國校園
    下一篇 :

     
    中國日報網英語點津版權說明:凡注明來源為“中國日報網英語點津:XXX(署名)”的原創作品,除與中國日報網簽署英語點津內容授權協議的網站外,其他任何網站或單位未經允許不得非法盜鏈、轉載和使用,違者必究。如需使用,請與010-84883561聯系;凡本網注明“來源:XXX(非英語點津)”的作品,均轉載自其它媒體,目的在于傳播更多信息,其他媒體如需轉載,請與稿件來源方聯系,如產生任何問題與本網無關;本網所發布的歌曲、電影片段,版權歸原作者所有,僅供學習與研究,如果侵權,請提供版權證明,以便盡快刪除。

    中國日報網雙語新聞

    掃描左側二維碼

    添加Chinadaily_Mobile
    你想看的我們這兒都有!

    中國日報雙語手機報

    點擊左側圖標查看訂閱方式

    中國首份雙語手機報
    學英語看資訊一個都不能少!

    關注和訂閱

    本文相關閱讀
    人氣排行
    熱搜詞
     
     
    精華欄目
     

    閱讀

    詞匯

    視聽

    翻譯

    口語

    合作

     

    關于我們 | 聯系方式 | 招聘信息

    Copyright by chinadaily.com.cn. All rights reserved. None of this material may be used for any commercial or public use. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. 版權聲明:本網站所刊登的中國日報網英語點津內容,版權屬中國日報網所有,未經協議授權,禁止下載使用。 歡迎愿意與本網站合作的單位或個人與我們聯系。

    電話:8610-84883645

    傳真:8610-84883500

    Email: languagetips@chinadaily.com.cn

    无码精品人妻一区二区三区人妻斩| 亚洲国产精品成人AV无码久久综合影院 | 日韩欧美中文亚洲高清在线| 无码AV中文字幕久久专区| 中文字幕一区二区三区在线观看| 18禁免费无码无遮挡不卡网站 | 亚洲av日韩av无码| 一级中文字幕免费乱码专区| 久久精品中文字幕一区| 2021国产毛片无码视频| 日韩人妻无码一区二区三区99| 无码八A片人妻少妇久久| 亚洲中文字幕无码不卡电影 | 中文文字幕文字幕亚洲色| 久久精品国产亚洲AV无码麻豆| 人妻无码精品久久亚瑟影视| 最近中文字幕完整版免费高清 | 少妇中文无码高清| а√在线中文网新版地址在线| 亚洲?V无码成人精品区日韩| 精品无码人妻一区二区三区品| 亚洲av中文无码乱人伦在线r▽| 精品亚洲成A人无码成A在线观看| 最近新中文字幕大全高清| 亚洲va中文字幕无码久久| 天堂√中文最新版在线| 亚洲gv天堂无码男同在线观看 | 亚洲AV无码一区二三区| 无码国模国产在线无码精品国产自在久国产| 亚洲av永久无码精品秋霞电影影院 | 亚洲av无码专区在线播放 | 亚洲精品无码久久久久sm| 中文字幕久久亚洲一区| 最近更新2019中文字幕| 最近中文字幕免费完整| 亚洲国产中文v高清在线观看| 人妻精品久久久久中文字幕| 久久无码AV中文出轨人妻| 中文字幕精品一区二区三区视频| 中文字幕无码不卡免费视频 | 亚洲AV中文无码乱人伦在线视色|