English 中文網 漫畫網 愛新聞iNews 翻譯論壇
    中國網站品牌欄目(頻道)
    當前位置: Language Tips> Audio & Video> 電影精講

    《2012》精講之三

    [ 2010-01-15 17:26]     字號 [] [] []  
    免費訂閱30天China Daily雙語新聞手機報:移動用戶編輯短信CD至106580009009
    精彩對白: This is Charlie Frost reporting live from Yellowstone National Park, soon to become the worlds largest active volcano. I'll be right back, folks.

    在去年上映的《先知》和《2012》兩部有關世界末日的影片中,地球最終都是被太陽毀滅的。那么,太陽輻射或者大爆發真的能毀滅地球嗎?來看看天文學家的觀點吧。

    Why the sun didn't destroy earth: Astronomers' new theory

    When astronomers began spotting planets around distant stars in the mid-1990s, they were baffled. Many of these early discoveries involved worlds as big as Jupiter or even bigger - but they orbited their stars so tightly that their "years" were just days long. Nobody could imagine how a Jupiter or anything like it could form in such a hostile location, where the radiation of the parent star would have pushed the light gas - which makes up most of such a planet's mass - out to the farthest reaches of the solar system before it could ever coalesce.

    But a handful of theorists already had a better explanation at hand. The giant planets could have formed in a much more sensible location, like Jupiter did, and then migrated inward, establishing a stable orbit there. It all made sense, except for one tiny problem: this same model also suggested that a little world like Earth shouldn't exist at all; it (or more precisely, the moon-size proto-planets that eventually assembled into Earth) should have spiraled into the sun more than 4 billion years ago. A star might not gobble a Jupiter whole when it moves close enough, but it could surely swallow a canapé like proto-Earth.

    《2012》精講之三

    "It's a problem," admits Mordecai-Mark Mac Low, an astronomer at New York's American Museum of Natural History. Or, rather, it was a problem - but Mac Low and his collaborators may have solved it. In a paper recently submitted to the Astrophysical Journal, they say that the old, Earth-destroying theory was generally accurate but lacked some key details - ones that both reshape theories about how planets form and, oh yes, allow the planet we know best to exist.

    Here's the basic difference: when the planets in our solar system first formed, they were swimming through a disk-shaped cloud of gas. Their passage roiled and compressed the gas, and the gravity of the compressed gas in turn pulled on the proto-planets. The original models suggested that the net effect would have been to drag the proto-planets inward - and while the drag would have stopped as the gas eventually dissipated, it would have been too late. They would long since have fallen into the sun.

    But those early models didn't take into account the fact that compressed gas heats up, which limits how dense it can become, and in turn limits how hard its gravity can pull on the proto-planets. Beyond that, the planets' own gravity would fling gas around - the same sort of phenomenon NASA counts on, say, when a spacecraft en route to Saturn gets a slingshot velocity boost from Jupiter on the way. By adding in both effects, Mac Low's collaborator Sijme-Jan Paardekooper, now at Cambridge, found that there are places where the net force pushes a planet inward, but other places where it pushes outward. And in between those are places where the net force is pretty much zero. "Once planets move into these regions," he says, "they stay." And that includes small planets like ours.

    Eventually, the disk of gas dissipates, and the proto-planets are fixed in their permanent orbits. Exactly where those orbits lie depends on all sorts of factors peculiar to a given planetary system - how much material there is in the original proto-planetary disk, how much of that is dust and how much is gas, how big the dust grains are, how hot the star is and more. That's one reason we should expect each solar system to look a little bit different. Which, as it turns out, they do.

    The new theory is one that has deep appeal to planet geeks but perhaps not as much to folks who don't ordinarily contemplate these things. But consider this: if the theory weren't right, it's possible that none of us would be here to contemplate anything at all.

    考考你

    1.基督徒說是審判日,但是瑪雅人很早就預言了。

    2.這種事你一定要保密。

    3.總會有人泄露出來。

    4.他就是我的忠實聽眾之一。

    《2012》精講之二參考答案

    1.You usually go digging with machine guns?

    2.The very same.

    3.Do you think those people would behave so selflessly knowing that their own lives were at stake?

    4.Mayor, could you escort these good people to the camp grounds, please.

    精彩對白:This is Charlie Frost reporting live from Yellowstone National Park, soon to become the worlds largest active volcano. I'll be right back, folks.

    點擊查看更多精彩電影回顧

    (中國日報網英語點津  編輯:Julie)

    上一頁 1 2 下一頁

     
    中國日報網英語點津版權說明:凡注明來源為“中國日報網英語點津:XXX(署名)”的原創作品,除與中國日報網簽署英語點津內容授權協議的網站外,其他任何網站或單位未經允許不得非法盜鏈、轉載和使用,違者必究。如需使用,請與010-84883631聯系;凡本網注明“來源:XXX(非英語點津)”的作品,均轉載自其它媒體,目的在于傳播更多信息,其他媒體如需轉載,請與稿件來源方聯系,如產生任何問題與本網無關;本網所發布的歌曲、電影片段,版權歸原作者所有,僅供學習與研究,如果侵權,請提供版權證明,以便盡快刪除。
     

    關注和訂閱

    人氣排行

    翻譯服務

    中國日報網翻譯工作室

    我們提供:媒體、文化、財經法律等專業領域的中英互譯服務
    電話:010-84883468
    郵件:translate@chinadaily.com.cn
     
     
    无码毛片AAA在线| 久久精品中文騷妇女内射| 日韩中文字幕在线| 人妻丰满熟妞av无码区| 在线天堂中文新版www| 中文字幕无码久久精品青草| 色窝窝无码一区二区三区| 熟妇人妻系列aⅴ无码专区友真希 熟妇人妻系列av无码一区二区 | 中文日韩亚洲欧美字幕| 人妻丰满熟妇AV无码区乱| 无码精品尤物一区二区三区| 亚洲av中文无码乱人伦在线r▽| 久久久无码精品亚洲日韩按摩 | 免费看成人AA片无码视频吃奶| 无码人妻黑人中文字幕| 久久无码人妻精品一区二区三区| 色欲狠狠躁天天躁无码中文字幕| 中文字幕无码精品三级在线电影 | 日韩一本之道一区中文字幕| gogo少妇无码肉肉视频| 玖玖资源站无码专区| 亚洲国产精品无码专区影院| 亚洲欧洲中文日韩av乱码| 日韩中文字幕在线视频| 国产亚洲中文日本不卡二区| 亚洲gv天堂无码男同在线观看| 丰满熟妇人妻Av无码区| 无码AV波多野结衣久久| 亚洲色无码专区在线观看| 自慰无码一区二区三区| 免费一区二区无码东京热| 人妻少妇看A偷人无码电影| 最近中文字幕2019高清免费| 精品久久久久中文字幕一区| 国产高清中文手机在线观看| 日韩中文字幕在线| 中文字幕一区二区三区乱码| 中文字幕性| 中文字幕乱码人妻无码久久 | 国产成人无码免费看视频软件 | 免费无码国产在线观国内自拍中文字幕|