English 中文網 漫畫網 愛新聞iNews 翻譯論壇
    中國網站品牌欄目(頻道)
    當前位置: Language Tips> 譯通四海> Columnist 專欄作家> Liu Shinan

    Accident law leaves a lot to be desired

    [ 2009-07-01 15:57]     字號 [] [] []  
    免費訂閱30天China Daily雙語新聞手機報:移動用戶編輯短信CD至106580009009

    Accident law leaves a lot to be desiredIf a man riding a tricycle bumps into your car parked legally on the roadside and dies of the injury sustained, and police tell you that you should pay part compensation to the man's family, what would you think?

    Don't be quick to scream "unfair!" Read Article 76 of the Road Traffic Safety Law and you will know you are legally liable to pay the compensation.

    According to the law, "when an accident occurs involving a motor vehicle and a non-motor vehicle or a pedestrian and there is evidence proving that the non-motor vehicle or the pedestrian is fully responsible for the accident, the motor vehicle party shall bear a no more than 10 percent responsibility for the compensation".

    But even that amount of penalty can be painful for a motorist questioning the fairness of the law.

    The Beijing Evening News reported on Monday that a woman who had parked her car in a legal roadside parking lot was ordered to pay compensation for the death of a man who bumped his tricycle into the car. He died of his injuries in a hospital later. The woman posted her doubts over the law on an Internet forum to seek help from netizens. "I was not in the car and I didn't do anything wrong. Why should I pay for somebody else's fault?" she said.

    I would have asked the same question if I were the owner of the car. But a judge interviewed by the Beijing Evening News reporter said the woman should pay the compensation, "because the Road Traffic Safety Law does not exempt the motor vehicle party from liability in (the event of) an accident involving a motor vehicle and a pedestrian unless the pedestrian causes the accident deliberately".

    Ever since its enactment in May 2004, the Road Traffic Safety Law has been mired in controversy. Before being revised in December 2007, the original version of the 76th article of the law appeared even more "unreasonable". It ruled: "If an accident occurs between a motor vehicle and a non-motorized vehicle or a pedestrian, the motor vehicle party shall bear the responsibility; but the party's responsibility shall decrease if there is evidence to prove that the non-motorized vehicle or pedestrian has violated the Road Traffic Safety Law and the driver of the motor vehicle has taken necessary measures during the accident."

    Many people questioned the rationality of the law. They argued that the 76th article of the law amounted to a statement that a car owner is destined to be the offender from the moment he/she buys the car.

    The aforementioned judge explained that the law was based on the General Rules of Civil Law, which states that a motor vehicle is a high-speed moving object and its operation is highly hazardous, and therefore its driver should bear a non-fault liability when the vehicle causes damage to other people.

    Here comes a question. In the woman's case, her car was parked on the roadside. It was not a "high-speed moving object" and therefore not "hazardous" at all. Isn't it ridiculous to blame the car owner when the accident was caused by the tricycle rider? The problem lies with the 76th article of the law, both in its original version and revision, which does not specify the difference between a moving vehicle and one that is parked when an accident involving it occurs.

    It was believed that the new Road Traffic Safety Law was the result of China's progress toward "human-oriented governance by law" introduced by "legal experts" from Western countries. Of course, we should salute these experts for their contribution to our country's progress.

    But I also hope they are more meticulous in drafting laws, and do not leave loopholes. They should be more careful while learning from Western statutes. For example, they could learn from their American colleagues who would explain the Colorado state law on traffic accidents: "A traffic accident is defined as unintentional damage or injury caused by the movement of a vehicle or its load."

    Note the word "movement".

    E-mail: liushinan@chinadaily.com.cn

    About the author:

    劉式南 高級編輯。1968年畢業于武漢華中師范學院(現華中師范大學)英文系。1982年畢業于北京體育學院(現北京體育大學)研究生院體育情報專業。1982年進入中國日報社,先后擔任體育記者、時政記者、國際新聞編輯、要聞版責任編輯、發稿部主任、《上海英文星報》總編輯、《中國商業周刊》總編輯等職。現任《中國日報》總編輯助理及專欄作家。1997年獲國務院“特殊貢獻專家政府津貼”。2000年被中華全國新聞工作者協會授予“全國百佳新聞工作者”稱號。2006年獲中國新聞獎二等獎(編輯)。

    ?相關閱讀:

    Blocking Net info all about saving youth

    Hard to help the elderly now

    Kids should study less, play more

    Where do officials do their jobs?

     

     

     
    中國日報網英語點津版權說明:凡注明來源為“中國日報網英語點津:XXX(署名)”的原創作品,除與中國日報網簽署英語點津內容授權協議的網站外,其他任何網站或單位未經允許不得非法盜鏈、轉載和使用,違者必究。如需使用,請與010-84883631聯系;凡本網注明“來源:XXX(非英語點津)”的作品,均轉載自其它媒體,目的在于傳播更多信息,其他媒體如需轉載,請與稿件來源方聯系,如產生任何問題與本網無關;本網所發布的歌曲、電影片段,版權歸原作者所有,僅供學習與研究,如果侵權,請提供版權證明,以便盡快刪除。
     

    關注和訂閱

    人氣排行

    翻譯服務

    中國日報網翻譯工作室

    我們提供:媒體、文化、財經法律等專業領域的中英互譯服務
    電話:010-84883468
    郵件:translate@chinadaily.com.cn
     
     
    无码永久免费AV网站| 亚洲人成无码www久久久| 中文字幕av无码专区第一页| 无码AV波多野结衣久久| 中文字幕一区二区三区在线观看 | 国产高清无码视频| 内射人妻少妇无码一本一道| 中文成人无字幕乱码精品区| 激情无码人妻又粗又大中国人| 中文字幕九七精品乱码 | 亚洲毛片网址在线观看中文字幕 | 涩涩色中文综合亚洲| 国产精品VA在线观看无码不卡| 国产aⅴ无码专区亚洲av麻豆| 中文字幕在线视频网| 中文字幕国产精品| 国产又爽又黄无码无遮挡在线观看 | yy111111电影院少妇影院无码| AV无码久久久久不卡蜜桃| 日本一区二区三区中文字幕| 婷婷中文娱乐网开心| 亚洲AV区无码字幕中文色| 无码国内精品久久人妻麻豆按摩| 色偷偷一区二区无码视频| 亚洲精品无码永久在线观看你懂的| 久久无码专区国产精品发布| 中文字幕精品一区二区三区视频| 最近最新高清免费中文字幕| 人妻少妇久久中文字幕| 在线天堂中文WWW官网| 日韩成人无码中文字幕| 精品久久久无码中文字幕天天| 国产真人无码作爱视频免费| 久久久久久久久无码精品亚洲日韩 | 中文字幕aⅴ人妻一区二区| 亚洲一区无码精品色| 亚洲无码日韩精品第一页| 中文字幕7777| 日韩中文字幕视频| 狠狠综合久久综合中文88| 精品深夜AV无码一区二区老年|