US 'house-for-visa' bill sparks discussion, criticism in China

    Updated: 2011-10-22 09:35

    By Wang Yan (China Daily)

      Comments() Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

    BEIJING - A bill unveiled by two US senators on Friday aiming to woo foreign homebuyers with residential visas drew mixed reactions in China, with some showing interest and others doubting its feasibility.

    The proposal, crafted by Democratic Senator Chuck Schumer and Republican Senator Mike Lee, would allow Chinese nationals, who are currently required to apply for a new US visa every year, to seek five-year, multiple-entry visitor visas, according to AFP.

    The average Chinese visitor to the United States spends $6,000, the lawmakers said in a statement.

    With the US housing market still in a slump four years after the subprime mortgage crisis, the bill would provide an unprecedented three-year residential visa for foreign nationals who invest $500,000 in a US home.

    At least $250,000 must go to a primary residence in which the buyer will live for at least 180 days out of the year "while paying taxes to the US", the statement said.

    With news of the bill appearing on some websites in China on Friday, the prospect of getting US visas for investing in a house worth $500,000 has sparked discussion among Chinese Internet users, partially due to surging house prices in China in recent years.

    The market price of an average apartment in central areas of major Chinese cities often exceeds the amount.

    A Chinese report on Netease, one of the portal sites in China, received more than 40,000 comments, with some of them eagerly discussing the prospect of residing in the United States at the cost of $500,000.

    But many pointed out that foreigners with residence visas cannot work in the US under current immigration rules.

    "The residence visa is not a green card," an Internet user named "Shirley_CPM" said on weibo.com, a popular micro-blogging site in China. "Since you cannot work, study, start a company, or have any social benefits, and have to stay in the US for a full six months, what is the use for that?"

    Other micro-bloggers said the likelihood of the bill being adopted is low, as the conditions are different in various states, and the bill will have a huge effect on immigrant investment regulations.

    A micro-blogger named "Shizifeiyang" said US politicians are "smart" for introducing the bill, as it will not cause an influx of labor to compete with US nationals for jobs, and in addition to stimulating the real estate sector, it will also boost consumption, as the people residing in the US will need to purchase daily necessities.

    Xiao Lian, a fellow of the US Economy Research Center under the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, said the bill is nothing new and will not become a major issue. The US already has laws that regulate how immigrants can invest, he said.

    "There are also difficulties in implementing it, since the issue involves a series of problems, such as homeland security in the US," he added.

    AFP contributed to this story.

    91中文字幕在线观看| 中文字幕无码精品三级在线电影| 中文字幕精品无码一区二区| 国产无码区| 最新国产精品无码| 亚洲中文字幕日产乱码高清app| 无码国产福利av私拍| 无码AV动漫精品一区二区免费 | 色综合中文字幕| 国产成人AV一区二区三区无码| 最近的2019免费中文字幕| 中文字幕亚洲男人的天堂网络| 人妻系列无码专区无码中出| 中文字幕无码毛片免费看| 波多野结衣在线aⅴ中文字幕不卡| 久久精品国产亚洲AV无码娇色 | 久久久久久久人妻无码中文字幕爆| 久草中文在线观看| 精品久久久无码人妻中文字幕豆芽 | 亚洲不卡无码av中文字幕| 无码GOGO大胆啪啪艺术| 在线精品无码字幕无码AV| 亚洲精品97久久中文字幕无码| 人妻无码αv中文字幕久久| 亚洲一级特黄无码片| av无码播放一级毛片免费野外| 日韩人妻无码中文字幕视频| 亚洲AV永久无码精品水牛影视 | 亚洲成AV人片在线播放无码| 国产品无码一区二区三区在线蜜桃 | 在线播放无码高潮的视频| 中文字幕在线无码一区二区三区| 欧美中文字幕一区二区三区| 爆操夜夜操天天操中文| 中文字幕乱妇无码AV在线| 亚洲欧美精品一中文字幕| 亚洲av无码不卡私人影院| 日韩亚洲国产中文字幕欧美| 小泽玛丽无码视频一区 | 天堂а√中文在线| 中文网丁香综合网|