您現在的位置: Language Tips> Columnist> Liu Shinan  
     





     
    Hassle over defective cell phone
    [ 2007-08-22 14:42 ]

    I bought a Motorola mobile phone last week. A few days later I found the sound of the phone was odd, like that of a radio not tuned properly. I went back to the shop and asked for a replacement, backed with the "three warranties policy", which says that the customer can return a commodity if it is defective within seven days after purchase or ask for a replacement within 15 days.

    The salesgirl made a few calls with the phone and told me the sound was all right. I was not surprised by her answer but insisted I be given a new phone. Realizing that she had met a tenacious customer, the salesgirl said she could replace it provided I proved that the defect was "not the consequence of improper use".

    I was angered by the answer. How could one do anything to a mobile phone to cause sound distortion? A problem with the sound quality can only be caused by a malfunction of the audio-frequency magnifier in the machine. Obviously the defect could not have been caused by my "improper use". What's more, there was no sign of physical damage to the phone.

    But she insisted: "I'm sorry, sir, it's our rule. Look at these warranty terms on the back of the invoice where you signed your name." Yes, I signed under the terms which state that any request for a refund or replacement should be accompanied by a certificate from the producer's service center.

    I had no alternative but call at Motorola's service center. There were a dozen or so customers waiting there. About 15 minutes later, it was my turn. A service woman tried my phone and told me it needs to be tested. The phone was then taken to a backroom.

    After another 25 minutes, my phone was brought back. The service woman admitted that the defect was caused by a glitch inside the phone. She signed a certificate and told me to go back to the shop to get a new one.

    At the shop they gave me a new phone "just taken from the warehouse". I asked for more units to choose from but was told it was the only one they had in stock. Responding to my doubts, they swore they were telling the truth. "Or you can come a few days later when more phones arrive from the plant," they said.

    I knew I had to accept what I was given, because I could not afford to waste more time on the matter.

    Though no fault of mine, I had to spend so much time and energy to enforce my rights as a consumer. In other words, I paid for Motorola's mistake. Should the company compensate me for the time, energy and money (travel fare) I had spent? It should, but I doubt it, nor would any other manufacturer in a similar case.

    My wife said: "Be content with what you have attained. They've done their best to replace the substandard phone with a new one."

    She may be right. Manufacturers today provide a much better after-sale service than in previous years. Consumers should feel content with the progress. But I still find I was unjustly treated. In the final analysis I had paid the cost for a company to make good a defective product. The final price I paid had been raised in fact.

    To be honest, I would not go to Motorola asking for compensation. Most other consumers would not either, for they know the time and energy they spend would far exceed the compensation they may get.

    However, something should be done to counter this unfairness. It was due to some customers' fight for compensation years ago that led to today's "three warranties policy" and the law on protection of consumers' rights.

    Our legislature and government should take a fresh look at the warranties to make it more amenable to consumers.


    Email: liushinan@chinadaily.com.cn


                    

                                      (China Daily 08/22/2007 page10)

     

     

    About the author:
     

    劉式南 高級編輯。1968年畢業于武漢華中師范學院(現華中師范大學)英文系。1982年畢業于北京體育學院(現北京體育大學)研究生院體育情報專業。1982年進入中國日報社,先后擔任體育記者、時政記者、國際新聞編輯、要聞版責任編輯、發稿部主任、《上海英文星報》總編輯、《中國商業周刊》總編輯等職。現任《中國日報》總編輯助理及專欄作家。1997年獲國務院“特殊貢獻專家政府津貼”。2000年被中華全國新聞工作者協會授予“全國百佳新聞工作者”稱號。2006年獲中國新聞獎二等獎(編輯)。

     
     
    相關文章 Related Stories
     
             
     
     
     
     
     
             

     

     

     
     

    48小時內最熱門

         
      癡情的祈禱:My prayer
      Click《人生遙控器》(精講之八)
      《這個殺手不太冷》主題曲:Shape of my heart
      樣樣精通,樣樣稀松?
      “剩飯”怎么說

    本頻道最新推薦

         
      Cold turkey: Can you dig it?
      是故意“不顧”還是“顧不上”?
      Been there, seen that
      中文店招英譯絕非易事
      A definition of sorts

    論壇熱貼

         
      怎么翻譯“你冤枉我”?
      “不服” 怎么翻譯
      how to say “舉手之勞”
      參加BBC在線競賽 獲免費倫敦游機會!
      Penny for your thoughts?
      怎么翻譯‘公益廣告'






    无码AV大香线蕉| 无码精品国产一区二区三区免费 | 精品亚洲成α人无码成α在线观看 | 最近免费中文字幕高清大全| 国产成人无码专区| 午夜无码A级毛片免费视频 | 伊人久久精品无码av一区| 中文亚洲欧美日韩无线码| 国产亚洲AV无码AV男人的天堂| 日韩人妻无码精品系列| 欧美日韩国产中文字幕| 伊人久久大香线蕉无码麻豆| 国精品无码一区二区三区在线| 中文无码伦av中文字幕| 久久男人中文字幕资源站| 亚洲中文字幕无码一区| 亚洲AV无码一区二区大桥未久| 精品人妻系列无码天堂| 亚洲AV无码精品色午夜果冻不卡| 国产成人无码区免费内射一片色欲| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区 | 日韩成人无码中文字幕| 国产在线观看无码免费视频| 无码少妇一区二区| 无码专区狠狠躁躁天天躁| 亚洲大尺度无码无码专区| 国内精品无码一区二区三区| 合区精品久久久中文字幕一区| 最近中文字幕高清中文字幕无| 精品久久无码中文字幕| 色欲综合久久中文字幕网| 中文字幕人妻色偷偷久久| 中文字幕VA一区二区三区| 中文字幕无码播放免费| 中文无码喷潮在线播放| 中文字幕亚洲乱码熟女一区二区| 中文字幕在线观看有码| 熟妇人妻中文字幕无码老熟妇 | 最近高清中文在线国语字幕5| 免费无码中文字幕A级毛片| 亚欧成人中文字幕一区|